10 replies to this topic

[JReber007]

Oh my God, I think I found the missing link to recent news stories. I'm not sure where to post this, but it's worth the look. Take a look at this (and don't let the link fool you) :

http://imagehost.auc.../goldmember.gif

[JReber007]

Nope, I'm afraid Blue Eyes did hit it right. That is a photo of Goldmember of "Austin Powers: License To Shag." (That is apparently the new title too - gee, I hope MGM doesn't want that one not to be used either.) I think Goldmember is a reject from a Richard Simmons dance video...

[White Knight]

Daredevil830 (21 Feb, 2002 03:00 p.m.):
Nope, I'm afraid Blue Eyes did hit it right. That is a photo of Goldmember of "Austin Powers: License To Shag." (That is apparently the new title too - gee, I hope MGM doesn't want that one not to be used either.) I think Goldmember is a reject from a Richard Simmons dance video...

License to shag sounds like a good title. I never would have thought of that one :-D

[Icephoenix]

I dont think the title is that original. Licence to Shag? Phuh! There using the Word Shag to much as well. (lol, same with JB Gold!)

[Blue Eyes]

Well no, the title won't be License To Shag. Newline Cinema have already confirmed that. Honestly think about it, if they can't use Goldmember they're not going to be stupid enough to test the waters by using License To Shag.

[Icephoenix]

Have to say, I agree. Where did u get this 'title' from Devil?

[Evil Doctor Cheese]

I've heard that title in a report on Ananova... they also said that New Line hated the title! And so do I. Personally I think that they will eventually give in and let them use Goldmember but that's just my opinion... why let them keep the character of Goldmember and not the title... it's a little feutile.

[White Knight]

Blue Eyes (20 Feb, 2002 02:10 a.m.):
That's the character Goldmember in Austin Powers III.

DR. EVIL!!!!!!

[Blue Eyes]

That's the character Goldmember in Austin Powers III.

[JReber007]

D'oh, I didn't want to post this yet. I want to see if anyone else catches on.

[Tanger]

???????? That sure is interesting (and a little freaky). But what significance does it hold???? Forgive my ignorance.