Owen Versus Jackman
#91
Posted 28 April 2004 - 08:41 AM
#92
Posted 28 April 2004 - 09:32 AM
One could argue that the relative riskiness over one actor is important if one cares, or wants to consider the business aspect of the franchise (and ultimately, its survival).
But then, one could also ditch any of that altogether and go solely on personal preference, instinct and gut reaction.
Or both.
#93
Posted 28 April 2004 - 10:19 AM
#94
Posted 28 April 2004 - 11:55 AM
Not just that, Hugh Jackmen is a great actor who could bring Bond's harder edge if and when required, he has range to play it dark and light when possible, so if they want those Tim Dalton dark moments, Jackmen as the capabilities to bring it to the role, in his style.we learned that the public doesnt really like the "Fleming/ Dalton " bond.so if they are smart Jackman is the better choice.
The big difference between Dalton and Jackmen is obviously Jackmen is already well known world wide, definately a bigger star then Dalton was when he got Bond, so the public has a liking to him already, which helps in whatever approaches they use for him in Bond if he becomes bond, and the public will go along with it more smoothy
Edited by SeanValen00V, 28 April 2004 - 11:57 AM.
#95
Posted 28 April 2004 - 12:16 PM
#96
Posted 28 April 2004 - 02:59 PM
#97 Civilian_007 Samurai_*
Posted 28 April 2004 - 03:14 PM
The source of all this (Flemings Bond) has a scar down his face - yet he is still attractive to women. It is the power of Bond that gets the girls - the confidence, and machoism. Not pretty boy model looks. Owen is good looking enough, but he does not look like somebody who in a fight would cry out 'not the face, not the face'. This I believe is what has made Connery attractive to generations of women - being a true man if you like - a mans man and a ladies man all at the same time. Gals (bless them) have an ability to see the inner man (so they say) and I reckon Owen's innerself probably just looks a little bit more rugged than Jackman's - and this is what makes him more like Bond.
Perhaps these days pretty little girlie-boys are increasingly in favour with women the world over, Beckham and has had more influence than I care to imagine. But it will be a cold day in heck before I wear my girlfriend's knickers, a dress and a hairband [individually each is perfectly OK - but together?]. And I hope an equally long time before Hugh Jackman becomes James Bond.
OWEN!
#98
Posted 28 April 2004 - 04:01 PM
I'll say what I've always said, he's got the intensity to be a great Bond as he's a great versatile actor. Don't get me wrong, he is eye candy but when people suggest actors it's not just for their looks, it's for their ACTING ability. And I have to say, he shines in each role he's given.
#99
Posted 28 April 2004 - 04:21 PM
This is something that's easier to portray in a book but much harder on screen as we bring our own values and judgement. I always cringed in the Connery and Moore Bond movies because I couldn't understand why the beautiful young women would find him attractive. If someone is goodlooking it's just easier to go with it.The source of all this (Flemings Bond) has a scar down his face - yet he is still attractive to women. It is the power of Bond that gets the girls - the confidence, and machoism. Not pretty boy model looks.
That said, I think Owen could be attractive enough so long as he has to do more than raise an eyebrow to win the girl. Of course, with Jackman, raising an eyebrow is all it would take! It's not just a matter of a pretty face; he has a strong physical presence that is quite alluring and very expressive eyebrows.
#100
Posted 28 April 2004 - 08:42 PM
1 he's british
2 better actor than Jackmans perma-confused look
3 he can do comedy (An evenin with Gary Lineker w/ Martin Clunes any1)
4 can do serious
5 he's cheaper than Jackman
6 wont mind committing long term
7 Jackman's too famous
#101
Posted 28 April 2004 - 09:15 PM
Owen Wilson!!!
#102
Posted 28 April 2004 - 10:46 PM
#103
Posted 28 April 2004 - 11:28 PM
Do you know this for sure? The only things I've ever heard from him are that the producers have never contacted him.Owen
6 wont mind committing long term
#104
Posted 29 April 2004 - 10:08 PM
Quite. Let the moneymen make suggestions appropriate to moneymen, and the fans make suggestions appropriate to fans.Is "safe choice" really a reason for wanting a particular person as Bond?
There's a big difference between saying "Jackman is likely to land the role because he's a safe choice" and saying "I'd like Jackman to land the role because he's a safe choice". I don't know why a fan would ever come out with the latter, unless he was only interested in seeing the Bond series make money and continue (and not interested in seeing the Bond series produce good films), and/or had a personal financial interest in Hugh Jackman IS James Bond.
Anyhow, here's a nice little pro-Owen bit in a review of the film I'LL SLEEP WHEN I'M DEAD in today's Evening Standard (a London daily paper):
"Incidentally, if Owen isn't cast as James Bond after his turn in this, those responsible are crackpots. However droll and sophisticated Bond might be, his moral temperature is absolutely zero, and Owen has the requisite unknowableness and cruelty in his face for the part."
#105
Posted 30 April 2004 - 03:18 AM
#106
Posted 30 April 2004 - 03:57 AM
Edited by 00-FAN008, 30 April 2004 - 03:58 AM.
#107
Posted 01 May 2004 - 11:00 PM
Owen sucks, Owen sucks, Owen sucks
Hugh Jackman will be selected as Bond and he will rule as James Bond 007 after Pierce Brosnan. I pray for you Hugh Jackman.
#108
Posted 02 May 2004 - 12:18 AM
I've tried to like him for Bond, but I keep picturing, Dalton made you believe more with his looks, Owen looks too average and not important enough, he's got to stand out, Connery, Moore, Dalton, Brosnan carry more presense easily, only Jackman can rival the past Bonds better then Owen.
Owen might be the right age, but Roger and Brosnan spoiled us in their youthful looks in their 40s and late 40s.
#109 Civilian_007 Samurai_*
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:46 PM
I'm pushing 30 [only - and frankly can't wait to shed the whole 'in my 20s' stigma] and I support Owen.
#110
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:55 PM
http://image.pathfin...01/img/owen.jpg
My mum saw Owen on Jonathan Ross' UK chat show and thought he was too unattractive play Bond. Honest. And she doesn't even like Bond films!!!
Do most women find Owen sexually attractive? Seriously, do they? Bond
has to appeal to women. My mum doesn't think he has the right stuff to
be Bond. I don't think Owen cuts it as a leading man. Sorry if that
sounds harsh but the new Bond has to have some 'movie star' quality.
Hugh Jackman would appear to be the only realistic choice and that's
why MGM signed him.
You got more chance of Elvis Presley singing the theme to Bond 21 than
Owen ever playing Bond. That's the harsh truth, folks.
Moomoo
#111
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:39 PM
I don't accept that. Granted, Owen isn't nearly as "commercial", "audience-friendly", etc. a candidate as Jackman, and I'm sure he's some way behind Jackman on the wishlist of The Powers That Be.You got more chance of Elvis Presley singing the theme to Bond 21 than
Owen ever playing Bond. That's the harsh truth, folks.
However, that doesn't mean that Owen isn't a viable candidate. He has a large following, not just among hardcore Bond fans but also in the media. A number of my friends are convinced that Owen will be the next Bond (re: Jackman, they exclaim "He can't be Bond! He's an Aussie!", or "He's too Hollywood"), and they're fine with that, although they're the sort of people who watch Bond films only when they're playing on TV on Bank Holidays. Yet Owen's popularity among fans seems to be growing - he's currently only eight votes behind Jackman in this poll here.
I'm certain that Owen is at number two on MGM/Eon's list, and that he'll end up playing Bond if (but only if) Jackman passes on the role or for some reason can't do it. Let's face it, there aren't exactly many good, realistic candidates to choose from. Even Brosnan has admitted that TPTB have been talking to Owen.
A lot of it may hinge on the kind of Bond film TPTB want to do. I can't picture Owen carrying a multimillion dollar fantasy epic like DIE ANOTHER DAY (for which Jackman would be the ideal, almost seamless, replacement for Brosnan), but if they wanted to make another LIVING DAYLIGHTS/LICENCE TO KILL, Owen's definitely the man. Of course, it's debatable that TPTB are either willing or able to do another TLD/LTK, but I wouldn't count Owen out of the race.
#112 Civilian_007 Samurai_*
Posted 04 May 2004 - 01:38 PM
1) He doesn't have a natural British accent - so would not sound like Bond when being interviewed, and therefore would not add value to the part when promoting every single film he is in - or even worse would sound like Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins.
2) He is in competing franchises - Money spent by Eon in raising his profile could act against them, if Bond DVDs and X-Men DVDs are sold side by side.
3) He is associated with other roles. When you look at any of the other guys you think - James Bond - when you look at this guy you think 'Wolverine'. How long before he sheds that stigma?
4) When you have a fan-base there is almost always a backlash. Only when somebody is very popular do people start hating them. I think most everybody would be willing to give Owen a go (even Jackman fans), in order to see what he had. However, many people have grown to dislike Jackman and would therefore stay away. Furthermore, Jackman fans expect CGI and fantasy elements, and may be put of by Bond.
5) He is very much like Brosnan - usually the Bond people try for a bit of change when they get a new Bond.
6) He is in competing franchises - If he starts making mega money from these films he could leave Bond when he pleases, or start demanding extraordinary amounts of cash to stay.
Owen on the other hand is British, is not in any competing franchises, is only associated with other roles akin to James Bond, his fans expect Bond style spy drama, he is a step away from Brosnan - therefore breathing new life into the series, and he is likely to be significantly cheaper than Jackman.
This is what Eon are looking for (or should be anyway).
#113
Posted 06 August 2004 - 12:12 AM
#114
Posted 06 August 2004 - 12:18 AM
VAN HELSING SUCKED DONKEY EGGS!
#115
Posted 06 August 2004 - 01:30 AM
Charming.I can't stand Jackman anymore. He's not the greatest actor in the world, you know, but people think he is. I go for Owen. He could totally do Bond! And he looks very good in his latest movie. What about Jackman?
VAN HELSING SUCKED DONKEY EGGS!
Regarding the question, these two seem to be the best contenders, Crashdrive IMO.
#116
Posted 06 August 2004 - 01:46 AM
I want Adrian Paul bringing a more athletic, tougher Connery style Bond back. The "I can kill in a minute if I have to" style, yet still managing to look good in a tux, charming a lady.
I suppose Owen doesn't say Bond to me because he could probably do the dark look of Bond okay enough, but I really don't see the sexy charming style at all in him. He doesn't carry the look of a man who can just look at a woman and have her falling for him.
#117
Posted 06 August 2004 - 01:47 AM
Truth be told, did anyone actually think he ever even was, seriously?Now with Bana out of the race, I guess we're still looking at the two most popular candidates for the part of Bond, Owen & Jackman. You think there is another actor who has as much as a shot as these two do?
#118
Posted 06 August 2004 - 01:52 AM
#119
Posted 06 August 2004 - 01:54 AM
More like "Bad, not even deserving to be a rumor", Pussycat.Not me, Qwerty! All I could think was "bad rumor" or "the producers have lost it completely and need therapy."
#120
Posted 06 August 2004 - 03:25 AM
Thumbs down on Clive Owen as Bond.
Thumbs up on Hugh Jackman as Bond.