Telly Savalas Is Not Blofeld
#1
Posted 11 January 2004 - 10:45 PM
Donald Pleasance's Blofeld was too one-dimensional and cartoonish
Charles Gray's Blofeld(s) were too suave, and not threatening enough.
For me, Telly Savales' Blofeld didn't seem like he would be the head of a world-wide organization like SPECTRE. He appealed to be more of a gangster, mafia type. For me, Blofeld at his best, was when he was hidden, like in FRWL or TB. Also, in OHMSS, Blofeld seemed too "hands-on." All of his other incarnations showed their power by pressing buttons, or issuing one of the many SPECTRE assassins to kill 007. He didn't seem that threatening when he involved himself in the Ski-chase, or started to panic when James chased him down the Bob-sled run. What do you think?
#2
Posted 11 January 2004 - 10:48 PM
The power and authority he shows in those two films is very quivering.
#3
Posted 11 January 2004 - 10:53 PM
So given the fact that SPECTRE is just about gone by OHMSS, it makes sense for Blofeld to be more hands on a simpler gangster type etc. And Telly Savalas gives a great perfomance accordingly.
Edited by brendan007, 11 January 2004 - 10:54 PM.
#4
Posted 11 January 2004 - 10:59 PM
#5
Posted 11 January 2004 - 11:00 PM
#6
Posted 11 January 2004 - 11:19 PM
#7
Posted 11 January 2004 - 11:23 PM
For me, Telly Savales' Blofeld didn't seem like he would be the head of a world-wide organization like SPECTRE. He appealed to be more of a gangster, mafia type. For me, Blofeld at his best, was when he was hidden, like in FRWL or TB. Also, in OHMSS, Blofeld seemed too "hands-on."
I agree. I like the sinister, mysterious Blofeld, who gives the orders from the shadows, and doesn't tolerate failure. Pleasance was a good image for Blofeld, if a little cartoonish and a tad too short (watching Connery tower over him doesn't really make Blofeld look a formidable foe). Not sure what has happened to SPECTRE come OHMSS, as I recall they're not mentioned by name in the film, but I didn't really go for Savalas as Blofeld either. Too dull, nothing special really.
#8
Posted 12 January 2004 - 12:38 AM
#9
Posted 12 January 2004 - 12:43 AM
The distinctive voice of Ernst Stavro Blofeld in From Russia with Love and Thunderball was provided by Austrian born actor named Eric Pohlmann. The body of the character was played by Anthony Dawson who played Professor Dent in Dr. No.
The character also doesn't seem English when he was portrayed by Donald Pleasence in You Only Live Twice. He seemed more European to me.
The literary Ernst Stavro Blofeld character was born in Gdynia, Poland on May 28th, 1908. His father is Polish, his mother, Greek.
Even though Fleming gave the character Polish/Greek ancestry, his name seems German.
I would have less of an issue with Telly Savalas as Blofeld if the James Bond movie series hadn't already established that the character was a continental European in previous films.
#10
Posted 12 January 2004 - 01:55 AM
It's so good to read someone who shares that sentiment. That was one of the highlights of NSNA.Best Blofeld is Max Von Sydow in NSNA. Somehow they managed to get it right there. He reflects those "unseen" Blofelds from the early films and Fleming's Blofeld at the same time. Excellent, understated performance in a flawed film. (I'd take Telly after that, though!)
With Savalas, I think he was a good match for Lazenby in a physical sense as Blofeld. Sure, I often couldn't put out of mind that the man was Kojak. He was a decent Blofeld. Now it would have been a different story, if Vincent Price was cast as Blofeld in OHMSS. It would have been perfect, not to imply that Savalas did an awful performance. It's just with Price menacing knack for playing villains would probably make Blofeld a very sinister villain.
#11
Posted 12 January 2004 - 03:01 AM
I think Blofeld HAS to be hands-on at this point. Bond has weeded his way through most of the SPECTRE organization, so there is no death squad to send after 007 when he is making an escape down the mountain, so Blofeld has to go himself. The only naff thing about Telly as Blofeld is, as Triton said, he is an American and Blofeld was already established as a 'Europey' kind of guy.
#12
Posted 12 January 2004 - 03:05 AM
It is a very interesting take on that, but I don't know if they simply got a new Blofeld because there was a new Bond. I've never read much about the real reason that Savalas got the part.Does anyone think it's possible that Telly being cast as Blofeld was Cubby and Harry's way of changing not only Bond, but his main nemesis? They knew there was going to be a 'different' Bond, so they cast a 'different' kind of villian that would work well with George. I think it was a conscious way of saying 'look, the Connery era is over'. Obviously that didn't happen, but I started thinking this when we see Blofeld pick up the phone when Bond escapes, he just kind of chucks his beloved cat down.
I think Blofeld HAS to be hands-on at this point. Bond has weeded his way through most of the SPECTRE organization, so there is no death squad to send after 007 when he is making an escape down the mountain, so Blofeld has to go himself. The only naff thing about Telly as Blofeld is, as Triton said, he is an American and Blofeld was already established as a 'Europey' kind of guy.
I too am glad that Blofeld was more hands on in this one, but I still slightly prefer the FRWL & TB incarnations.
#13
Posted 13 January 2004 - 12:22 AM
I too think that Vincent Price would have made a formidable Blofeld. A classic villain. I also agree with the comment about making Blofeld more hands-on because SPECTRE was pretty much disbanded. This makes since, but the quality that made SPECTRE so threatening was the whole "octopus" theory:It's so good to read someone who shares that sentiment. That was one of the highlights of NSNA.Best Blofeld is Max Von Sydow in NSNA. Somehow they managed to get it right there. He reflects those "unseen" Blofelds from the early films and Fleming's Blofeld at the same time. Excellent, understated performance in a flawed film. (I'd take Telly after that, though!)
With Savalas, I think he was a good match for Lazenby in a physical sense as Blofeld. Sure, I often couldn't put out of mind that the man was Kojak. He was a decent Blofeld. Now it would have been a different story, if Vincent Price was cast as Blofeld in OHMSS. It would have been perfect, not to imply that Savalas did an awful performance. It's just with Price menacing knack for playing villains would probably make Blofeld a very sinister villain.
-Blofeld was the enormous head of the octopus, and he had tentacles spread all around the world, ready to crush and suffocate his prey when necessary. I understand that SPECTRE was like a mafia, bit the thing that appealed about them was that it's members weren't gangsters, they were businessmen, royalty even. It had a certain level of class, which just wasn't seen in OHMSS. The lack of SPECTRE made Blofeld dull, and rather pointless.
Also, the villains plan wasn't really that formidable either. It was just to spread biological agents throughout the world unless he's paid a sum of money. Compared to some of the Blofeld plots in YOLT and DAF, this seemed pretty bleak.
#14
Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:37 PM
Telly was good in his own way, I like his character and his scenes with Bond. But I don't see him as Blofeld (maybe a wanna-be Blofeld). Telly comes across more as a mafioso--and does a great job of that.
Forget Pleasance and Gray. I love Charles Gray as an actor, and his brief scene in YOLT has far more impact than his work in DAF.
#15
Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:54 PM
#16
Posted 17 January 2004 - 03:33 PM
Salvalas just never hit it right for me. He seemed to have the look okay, but was just a mafioso in the end. Not much dangerous power there.
Sure, it's the unseen Blofelds that got the award. However, if YOLT had a allowed Pleasance to remain unseen, he would've been the golden Blofeld for me.