
Is Goldfinger overrated as a Bond movie
#1
Posted 08 January 2003 - 10:22 PM
#2
Posted 08 January 2003 - 10:59 PM
Funnily enough, I got the book "Bond Films" for x-mas and am up to Goldfinger. The book highlights that Bond, in this adventure does not directly foil Goldfingers plans. A quote from the book include:
"Having said this, the character is peripheral at best, and plays no real part in the plots resolutions. He is however so cool that this largly goes by unnoticed by audiences".
This may be what is missing (for me anyway).
#3
Posted 08 January 2003 - 11:04 PM
#4
Posted 08 January 2003 - 11:51 PM
And that thread showed me no one believes me! So you're right: it is overrated. Not bad though.
#5
Posted 09 January 2003 - 04:43 AM
#6
Posted 09 January 2003 - 09:46 AM
I love it
#7
Posted 09 January 2003 - 01:55 PM
#8
Posted 09 January 2003 - 07:43 PM
#9
Posted 10 January 2003 - 11:25 AM
Dont get me wrong, its a great movie, but I find it to be very overrated, it is often named as the best Bond of them all, I just dont get it. It has some really great scenes, love the beginning with Goldfinger cheating at cards. Bond is at his coolest. But nothing really seems to happen, and the locations are fairly ordinary throughout. And the sceene with the planes flying over and all the soldiers falling over looked kind of silly.
I agree with kevrichardson, Bond just doesnt seem to do anything.
Jim
#10
Posted 13 March 2003 - 02:26 AM
#11
Posted 13 March 2003 - 05:07 PM
What do we know about them, apart from they are good?
Goldfinger over-rated? Sure, in the same way as the Mona Lisa is over-rated as a painting or Hamlet as a play...
It's one of the best.

#12
Posted 13 March 2003 - 06:30 PM
#13
Posted 13 March 2003 - 06:39 PM
Originally posted by ChandlerBing
Goldfinger was good, but not the best Bond film to ever walk on the water. It gets a little annoying when people kep piping up screaming how much they love Goldfinger. C'mon, guys, be original, there are 19 other ones you can pick. It's allowed.
That's why I say The Spy Who Loved Me is the best...but Goldfinger's still untouchable, especially by today's standards...I just saw Die Another Day again last weekend and comparing that to Goldfinger is like comparing Natural Light to Guinness--they both get the job done, but one does it with so much more class & taste.
#14
Posted 13 March 2003 - 06:44 PM
I never thought of it that way before. "Goldfinger" must be the Guinness to the Natural light of DAD .Originally posted by Adam
saw Die Another Day again last weekend and comparing that to Goldfinger is like comparing Natural Light to Guinness--they both get the job done, but one does it with so much more class & taste.
#15
Posted 13 March 2003 - 07:08 PM
#16
Posted 13 March 2003 - 07:13 PM
#17
Posted 14 March 2003 - 08:50 PM
place here and it was THE film that seemed to usher in the '60's spy craze. Including those ridiculous "Dr. Goldfoot" movies with Vincent Price.
Overrated? Perhaps, but I would certainly call it the most influential Bond
film.
#18
Posted 14 March 2003 - 08:56 PM
#19
Posted 14 March 2003 - 09:06 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
The Most Definitive Bond Movie is "OHMSS". Or "ThunderBall" if you have to pick a Connery film. "Goldfinger" is just good bondian fun . Plus Cubby Broccoli's Definitive Bond film was "FRWL" .
I say GF only because while FRWL had a pre-title sequence
and Q scene and DR. NO had a gambling scene ALL the conventions we've grown accustomed to first appeared together in GF and continued in subsequent films including both TB & OHMSS. FRWL May be the BEST
pure Bond film, (there's a good case for OHMSS too!) BUT I still think
GF is the "watershed" Bond film.
#20
Posted 14 March 2003 - 09:15 PM
Okay brother have it your way . We all are entitled to are opinions .Originally posted by Mr. Kidd
ALL the conventions we've grown accustomed to first appeared together in GF and continued in subsequent films including both TB & OHMSS. FRWL May be the BEST
pure Bond film, (there's a good case for OHMSS too!) BUT I still think
GF is the "watershed" Bond film.
#21
Posted 15 March 2003 - 05:11 PM
#22
Posted 15 March 2003 - 05:25 PM
Originally posted by flares
Bond is so good in GF, real style and class. Anyone who can get away with the blue velour number he wears in Miami, can carry off any issues with the plot.
I love it
That wasn't velour, it was terrycloth- yikes!
Mr. Kidd has it right. GF was the watershed film in terms of the series' style, gadgets, sexuality and relative suspense as well as "Hitchcockian" elements.
Opinions may differ in terms of what is the "best" bond film but GF is usually seen as the zenith of Connery's tenure and the series as a whole.
#23
Posted 15 March 2003 - 09:11 PM
#24
Posted 15 March 2003 - 09:29 PM
blonde with motive for duplicity and revenge. Certain shots had a feel of
Hitchcock too. Specifically the shots of Bond tailing Goldfinger in the
countryside and Bond & Tillie separately and voyeuristically watching
goldfinger from afar as he pulls over and buys from a roadside stand.
Oh, and in the shots at the gas station as well when the Bond and
Tillie first eye each other. Just had a Hitchcock "feel".
#25
Posted 15 March 2003 - 11:40 PM
Originally posted by Mr. Kidd
Can't put my (gold)finger on it, but there were definately shades of Hitchcock particularly in the scenes with Tilly Masterton. A mysterious
blonde with motive for duplicity and revenge. Certain shots had a feel of
Hitchcock too. Specifically the shots of Bond tailing Goldfinger in the
countryside and Bond & Tillie separately and voyeuristically watching
goldfinger from afar as he pulls over and buys from a roadside stand.
Oh, and in the shots at the gas station as well when the Bond and
Tillie first eye each other. Just had a Hitchcock "feel".
I was thinking in terms of Tilly Masterson. You think that she's "the" Bond Girl that 007'll end up with by picture's end. however, she's killed less than ten minutes after he on-screen appearance. That's what threw people watching "Psycho." you thought Janet Leigh was going to be around for the remainder of the pic but she's killed halfway through.
Also, Pussy's transformation from bad girl to good. She's dressed in black when we first see her and she's decked out in white for the climax and the finale- after Bond "appealed to her maternal instincts." This was done in Psycho as well but in reverse w/Leigh.
We're not talking DePalma style "homages" here, just little things that you see after watching the Bond series and Hitchcock's films.
#26
Posted 16 March 2003 - 12:57 AM
#27
Posted 17 March 2003 - 03:36 AM
Originally posted by Robinson
I was thinking in terms of Tilly Masterson. You think that she's "the" Bond Girl that 007'll end up with by picture's end. however, she's killed less than ten minutes after he on-screen appearance. That's what threw people watching "Psycho." you thought Janet Leigh was going to be around for the remainder of the pic but she's killed halfway through.
Also, Pussy's transformation from bad girl to good. She's dressed in black when we first see her and she's decked out in white for the climax and the finale- after Bond "appealed to her maternal instincts." This was done in Psycho as well but in reverse w/Leigh.
We're not talking DePalma style "homages" here, just little things that you see after watching the Bond series and Hitchcock's films.
Oh no, I didn't think Hamilton was doing an "homage" to hitchcock. Just that some scenes had a look and mood that reminded me of Hitchcock. Thought someone else felt the same way.
#28
Posted 19 March 2003 - 03:08 PM