
Bond in the Middle East
#1
Posted 17 December 2002 - 02:02 AM
#2
Posted 17 December 2002 - 02:58 AM
I'd like to see Bond in the Middle East, but maybe it would be best left to a book. I agree, a middle eastern villian would be great and long overdue.
#3
Posted 17 December 2002 - 05:59 PM
and if turkey is a middle eastern country then bond went to the middle east in both FRWL and TWINE.
#4
Posted 18 December 2002 - 12:50 AM
Anyway, now that I've confused everyone, I'd like to point out that there is certainly no 'political' reason Bond shouldn't fight an Arab or Israeli since the media daemonises those people anyway, I think that MGM would love to help with the 'war on terror' and have Bond on 'our' side.
And Tamil Rahini was a lame villain, in my opinion.
#5
Posted 18 December 2002 - 01:38 AM
Originally posted by General Koskov
And Tamil Rahini was a lame villain, in my opinion.
Welcome to Gardner-land.
I wouldn't be opposed to a Middle Eastern villain, as long as they do it tactfully...and not have him fly planes into buildings or anything...like...that...
...I'll stop talking now.
#6
Posted 18 December 2002 - 06:14 AM
#7
Posted 28 December 2002 - 10:57 PM
Unless a plot was devised that actively worked to present moderate Muslims in a positive light, say Bond working with his old Mujahadin mates to prevent Zao, who has mutated into George Dubya Bush, from triggering an apocalyptic war.
Can't see that approach being adopted though.
#8
Posted 30 December 2002 - 09:37 PM
#9
Posted 30 December 2002 - 10:01 PM
And also a brief mention of a General Chang, who proceeds to disappear from the film entirely.
#10
Posted 30 December 2002 - 10:12 PM
A backlash from any organised ethnic or cultural group can adversely affect a film's box office. We've already seen examples of protests about middle eastern baddies in films causing a stink, and that was before tensions escalated.
This frightens studios with an eye on the bottom line.
Also, we've already seen with DAD that a lot of overseas location shooting was abandoned for fear that a high profile icon of all that's sinful in the west like poor old 007 might attract violent protests.
I don't think that MGM would consider shooting Bond 21 even in a friendly location like Morocco, doubling for Iraq or wherever, in the current climate (of course in two years time things might change).
My comment about Dubya as a villain was, of course, completely facetious.
#11
Posted 02 January 2003 - 11:01 PM
And as for Dubya...I'd make him a villian. Sure, why not?

#12
Posted 03 January 2003 - 12:11 AM
#13
Posted 03 January 2003 - 12:28 AM
Bond
#14
Posted 03 January 2003 - 12:33 AM
#15
Posted 03 January 2003 - 12:50 AM
In any case, the western nations will no longer require oil from there, or anywhere else, from that matter. As a result, the West will no longer support those corrupt Middle Eastern governments. Those governments will fall, and the Middle East will turn into a cesspool of violence and hatred. Wait a minute. It already is.
Anyways, from those collapsing governments, we could get some interesting characters to meet Bond. After all, Xenia Onnatop came from the former Soviet Union
#16
Posted 03 January 2003 - 09:05 AM
#17
Posted 03 January 2003 - 08:08 PM
But i think cinemagoers would be thinking too much of True Lies and the middle eastern villain in that if Bond met a middle eastern.
But still i think that it is a cracking idea, i posted an idea not too long ago about middle eastern terrorists attacking British and American oil interests. But maybe that area will be too touchy for a while yet
#18
Posted 06 January 2003 - 03:26 AM
In that case, we have already had a Middle Eastern villain, threatening the oil supply to the West. The villain was the beautiful Electra King, and not some stinking bearded Arab, hiding in a cave...
#19
Posted 09 January 2003 - 02:42 AM
#20
Posted 09 January 2003 - 03:36 AM
And we desparately need the President of the US to be a villain, though I suspect there would be some additions to the CIA's assassination list if that happened. Damned conspiracies screwing us out of a good film!
#21
Posted 09 January 2003 - 03:49 AM
#22
Posted 09 January 2003 - 04:40 AM
#23
Posted 09 January 2003 - 04:46 AM
Originally posted by General Koskov
Right, because there is no drug problem anymore and drug lords are a thing of the past...
I wasn't saying the problem was gone, just that the media isn't covering it extensively and you don't hear much anymore about drug lords being busted. On the other hand, middle eastern terrorists are all the media talks about lately.
#24
Posted 09 January 2003 - 01:39 PM
A few painted buildings to look white or sandstone, remove the sheep, add the chanting and there you go - Saudi.
Yeah, I guess it could be done.
#25
Posted 10 January 2003 - 08:37 AM
It's time for a non-specific loony who hates everyone - qv Stromberg and Drax. Actually, that'd be more entertaining than the crass attempts to be "contemporary".
#26
Posted 10 January 2003 - 08:39 AM
#27
Posted 10 January 2003 - 08:46 AM
Originally posted by Jim
Multiple orgasm - sorry.
(double post)
Oh God, all fingers and thumbs today.
Wife looks strangely pleased, but I apologise for wasting everyone's time
#28
Posted 10 January 2003 - 02:18 PM
#29
Posted 17 January 2003 - 01:23 AM
I did want to comment though on that Asians have all been villianized. I do concede that Fleming/the films have had a high share of asian villians, but there have been many heros as well. Dr. No and GF are pretty one sided, but we have the great Tiger, Kissy and Aki in YOLT (and really only on Japanese baddie, Mr. Osato). In TMWTGG, Hai Fat is bad, but not evil, and a very impressive character. I always liked Lt. Hip in that film, and although the Siamese fighting school is made to look sort of foolish (although Chu-la is tough), again, the villian is not actually Thai or Chinese.
In TLD, Kamran SHah appears foolish, but is actually a suave resistance fighter, who leads his fighters to aid Bond, who later aides them!
In TND, again other than minor Chang, the only asian baddies are the henchmen in Saigon. Their butts are clearly kicked by Chinese Wai Lin.
Despite the hoopla in Korea about DAD, the older N.Korean general is quite sympathetic, although I would be offended about Bond and the girl having sex in a church if it was in the Western countries. Clearly Graves/whatever is a renegade, crazy general, just as Orlov was in Octopussy, not meant to tarnish the entire country of the USSR, even in the cold war!
My point is, yes there have been some villians from these countries, but it's more balance than some suggest. I can't think of one good German character in these films (Helga Brandt, Stamper, Stromberg, Goldfinger, Ilse Bundt,etc), yet Germans haven't boycotted the films.
Sorry for all my off-topic, but as far as the middle east goes, I think it's just too touchy of a political area for the films to touch. THey go for topical, but not political.
#30
Posted 17 January 2003 - 02:18 AM
Originally posted by templer1972
Bond versus middle eastern villian is a big mistake and if it really happen this going to be the first bond film which will be banned in most islamic country because of it subject matter.Look at film such as True Lies,Executive Decision and The Seige all three was banned is every muslim country and few asian islamic country ,and it really affected the overseas box office gross for this film.I strongly against the above ideas and dont want Brosnan final bond film becoming his lowest box office collection .
Who's to say that American, Austrailian and British box office sales wouldn't go through the roof though and make up for it?