Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

From Sussex with Love? Budget rumours.


76 replies to this topic

#1 Luigi Ferrari

Luigi Ferrari

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 981 posts
  • Location:Cortina, ITA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:41 AM

http://www.mirror.co...15875-23705143/

His car’s an Aston Martin, his martini is shaken not stirred and his suit’s perfectly tailored – but perhaps not for much longer.
James Bond producers have had to slash their budget and are shooting in Bognor Regis after scrapping plans to head for six different exotic countries to make the next 007 film Skyfall.
Instead of distant locations such as India, China and Bali, they are using various UK beaches. Skyfall will also rely heavily on special effects and advanced sets at Pinewood Studios in Buckinghamshire.


A source said: “To say some of the cast and crew are a bit gutted is an understatement.
“Originally six different countries were selected to film certain scenes but after several technical and financial problems, it was decided to scale back and just use Turkey as the sole foreign location.
“As well as Pinewood’s incredible facilities, the UK has an array of amazing, untapped resources, and some stunning beaches particularly along the south coast and parts of Wales.
“While Bognor is hardly the most exotic of locations, it is important for the franchise that they support British industry, and give something back.
“Everyone is confident this will be one of the best Bonds ever.”
After repeated delays, filming began two months ago – with Daniel Craig, 43, as Bond for a third time – and it is due for release in November.

Scenes have also been shot at London’s Charing Cross and Canary Wharf.
Craig is the sixth actor to play the British spy on the big screen, taking over from Sean Connery, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan.
His first outing, in Casino Royale, was the most successful installment in the franchise’s 48-year history, taking £385mn at the global box office.



Side note for the moderators: feel free to modify the title.

Edited by Luigi Ferrari, 18 January 2012 - 01:38 AM.


#2 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:53 AM

interesting....but do we know if the budget has cut back? I wonder what scenes they plan to use Bognor Regis for

#3 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:55 AM

I remember I was thrown out of Bognor Regis's pier arcade when I was 12 on a school trip, for attacking one of the (rigged) grab machines.

#4 Luigi Ferrari

Luigi Ferrari

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 981 posts
  • Location:Cortina, ITA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:05 AM

I wonder what scenes they plan to use Bognor Regis for


A recent rumour was that they were searching for some Jet Ski stuntmen...

#5 MattofSteel

MattofSteel

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2482 posts
  • Location:Waterloo, ON

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:06 AM

This is utterly ridiculous. Should be in the tabloid garbage thread.

On a major film like Skyfall, a budget of that size would be locked, guaranteed, and insured multiple times over. Studio wouldn't simply come down one day and say, "Hey, we're going from $150 million down to $100. Deal with it." The whole point of extensive pre-production is to line everything up based on these costs.

Secondly, the article is rife with total inaccuracies. Six countries is total bollocks. Bali was never involved. So far, we've seen nothing but vague reports confirming Mendes' proclamation of Turkey, China, and Scotland being the countries external to England involved.

Thirdly, look at the supposed "quote." It goes from being doom-and-gloom about budget into a British tourist commercial. Why this person would have any stake in the producers' thinking re: 'giving something back to the British film industry' is beyond me.

I mentioned it another thread. This is nothing more than the 'Duntrune' location scrapping run amok as hack tabloid writers try to turn "Bond producers change their minds regarding one location" into "the entire production is being scaled down and will feature 40 minutes of James Bond cooking dinner for M to save costs."

It's the 50th anniversary of James [censored] Bond. I'm quite sure we'll get what we all want.

#6 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:08 AM

I think you are right....this is bogus and there is no evidence to support this...at the press conference the budget is still the same and the script has been adding not decreasing.....just some media trying to get attention

#7 Luigi Ferrari

Luigi Ferrari

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 981 posts
  • Location:Cortina, ITA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:10 AM

Note for the moderators: feel free to move this article to the tabloid garbage thread.

#8 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:15 AM

This is utterly ridiculous. Should be in the tabloid garbage thread.

I agree. I didn't realise it was by The Mirror to begin with, but the thing that convinced me that this was BS was the comment about relying on "advanced sets" at Pinewood. This is nothing new for a Bond film - the safehouse and art gallery sets in QUANTUM OF SOLACE were both filmed at Pinewood, mostly because the script calls for specific things that aren't necessarily available on demand in the actual locations. It was then that I double-checked the URL and found that it was printed by The Mirror.

#9 univex

univex

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2310 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 01:20 AM

Yes, quite. But even if they use alternate locations, it still doesn´t tell us the film will be crap. I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece, even if they filmed NY in a set or Vietnam in England. They´ll do just fine. It´s gonna be one helluva film.

Edited by univex, 18 January 2012 - 01:21 AM.


#10 Pierce - Daniel

Pierce - Daniel

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:02 AM

China scrapped? Bad move. Having said this Istanbul and London have a very Tinker, Tailor vibe, which i love.

#11 Matt_13

Matt_13

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5969 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:09 AM

This isn't true guys.

#12 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:19 AM

Stranger things have happened. It might be better to wait and see before deciding whether it's rubbish or not.

#13 Mr. Blofeld

Mr. Blofeld

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9173 posts
  • Location:North Smithfield, RI, USA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:23 AM

As King George V famously spoke as a fitting final epitaph: "Bugger Bognor!"

#14 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:26 AM

This isn't true guys.

Of course not - but that's beside the point. When dealing with tabloids, the "truth" doesn't come into it. All they care about is getting more readers, and so publish whatever they think will achieve that, regardless of how true it is. And by discussing it, we're only enabling them.

#15 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:28 AM

I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

#16 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:39 AM


This isn't true guys.

Of course not - but that's beside the point. When dealing with tabloids, the "truth" doesn't come into it. All they care about is getting more readers, and so publish whatever they think will achieve that, regardless of how true it is. And by discussing it, we're only enabling them.

You don't know that. It might be true, or it might not. Just because something's in tabloid newspaper doesn't automatically mean it's wrong.

#17 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:45 AM

You don't know that. It might be true, or it might not.

I'll believe what the evidence shows. And I can find no evidence that this is true.

Just because something's in tabloid newspaper doesn't automatically mean it's wrong.

Just because a tabloid is a newspaper, it doesn't automatically mean it can be trusted.

#18 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:49 AM

Just because something's in tabloid newspaper doesn't automatically mean it's wrong.


There's a great likelihood though.

#19 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:58 AM


You don't know that. It might be true, or it might not.

I'll believe what the evidence shows. And I can find no evidence that this is true.

Can you find any evidence that it isn't true yet, though?


Just because something's in tabloid newspaper doesn't automatically mean it's wrong.

Just because a tabloid is a newspaper, it doesn't automatically mean it can be trusted.

Which is why we should wait and see.


Just because something's in tabloid newspaper doesn't automatically mean it's wrong.


There's a great likelihood though.

True. But we don't know for certain yet.

Anyway, there's no shame in cheating on the locations. It's been a standard practice in Bond films since the beginning. The magic of the movies and all that.

#20 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:59 AM

Can you find any evidence that it isn't true yet, though?

Yes. Nobody from EON has commented on it.

Which is why we should wait and see.

We don't need to wait and see. There is no evidence that the budget has been cut, and if you're willing to take The Mirror's word for it, then you're a moron.

#21 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:01 AM


Can you find any evidence that it isn't true yet, though?

Yes. Nobody from EON has commented on it.

Which is why we should wait and see.

We don't need to wait and see. There is no evidence that the budget has been cut, and if you're willing to take The Mirror's word for it, then you're a moron.

I'm not taking anyone's word for it yet. Least of all yours.

#22 univex

univex

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2310 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:02 AM

I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

Didn´t frase that well did I. They weren´t short of being masterpieces, they WERE ALL masterpieces. There, fixed it ;)

About this rumour being bollocks, I like to think it is, no evidence to corroborate one side or the other, so I´ll go with my expectations once again.

Edited by univex, 18 January 2012 - 03:04 AM.


#23 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:05 AM


I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

Didn´t frase that well did I. They weren´t short of being masterpieces, they WERE ALL masterpieces. There, fixed it ;)

About this rumour being bollocks, I like to think it is, no evidence to corroborate one side or the other.


I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

Didn´t frase that well did I. They weren´t short of being masterpieces, they WERE ALL masterpieces. There, fixed it ;)


I'd say FEAR AND DESIRE, KILLER'S KISS, THE SHINING, FULL METAL JACKET and EYES WIDE SHUT were pretty far from the mark, if you ask me.

#24 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:05 AM

I think Royal Dalton works for the mirror.......

anyway this is getting way off topic

#25 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:09 AM

I'm not taking anyone's word for it yet. Least of all yours.

Then why are you willing to pay more attention to a tabloid - one with a documented history of making things up - than you are to EON, the people who are actually in a position to know what they're talking about?

#26 Matt_13

Matt_13

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5969 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:09 AM

...Yeah this isn't true. Mendes announced the shooting locations at the press conference ( "A large portion of the film will be shot in the UK"). The locations in Turkey and China have already been scouted, filming permissions have already been distributed, hotels have been booked, etc. There was never a plan for 6 locations. I trust Barbara and Michael's words at the conference over this.

#27 univex

univex

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2310 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:31 AM



I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

Didn´t frase that well did I. They weren´t short of being masterpieces, they WERE ALL masterpieces. There, fixed it ;)

About this rumour being bollocks, I like to think it is, no evidence to corroborate one side or the other.


I´ve mentioned Full Metal Jacket once before, as well as Eyes wide shut, and Kubrick never made anything short of being a masterpiece.


Yes he did, several times in fact.

Didn´t frase that well did I. They weren´t short of being masterpieces, they WERE ALL masterpieces. There, fixed it ;)


I'd say FEAR AND DESIRE, KILLER'S KISS, THE SHINING, FULL METAL JACKET and EYES WIDE SHUT were pretty far from the mark, if you ask me.

eh eh, love them all, but that´s for another thread my friend. I´m a huge Kubrick fan so there´s no cure for me.

#28 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:34 AM


I'm not taking anyone's word for it yet. Least of all yours.

Then why are you willing to pay more attention to a tabloid - one with a documented history of making things up - than you are to EON, the people who are actually in a position to know what they're talking about?

I'm not paying more attention to a tabloid. But things can change. When someone with actual links to the film, like Col. Sun, says it is or isn't true, then we'll know. Until then we can't say for certain.

#29 univex

univex

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2310 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:39 AM



I'm not taking anyone's word for it yet. Least of all yours.

Then why are you willing to pay more attention to a tabloid - one with a documented history of making things up - than you are to EON, the people who are actually in a position to know what they're talking about?

I'm not paying more attention to a tabloid. But things can change. When someone with actual links to the film, like Col. Sun, says it is or isn't true, then we'll know. Until then we can't say for certain.

I agree wholeheartdly RD. Besides, a couple of days ago I heard the same thing from someone who said he talked with the crew while they were filming, he was pretty specific on the intel, detailing some of the sets that were scrapped and stuff like that. Of course I don´t believe him quite yet because he hasn´t got the credentials of a, say, Col, but it makes you think, consider and, why not?, discuss such options. After all, these ARE forums.

Edited by univex, 18 January 2012 - 03:40 AM.


#30 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 18 January 2012 - 08:24 AM

This does appear to have some momentum of the "need to fill space / airtime" variety - radio five breakfast running something on it. The way rumours spread, eh?

Although it seems they dropped the item. How...very...odd. Or not. Or thing, whatever.