
Roger Moore physically and athletically the worst Bond? Why.....
#1
Posted 20 October 2002 - 03:17 PM
In my opinion of all Bonds I feel Roger Moore was the "weakest" Bond.
When he ran it felt like he had a huge weight on his shoulder.
Lets look at Sean Connery in YOLT when he is chasing Aki.
Lets look at George Lazenby overall throughout OHMSS.
Lets look at Timothy Dalton in the pre-title sequence in LTK whan he is running for the helicopter.
Lets look at Pierce Brosnan when he is being chased in the Carver news factory.
Roger Moore looks unfit in all the action sequences. Maybe I am being unfair because I didn't mind him as Bond but just felt he was not physically demanding enough as Bond.
Sorry to all the Roger Moore fans out there...............
#2
Posted 20 October 2002 - 03:52 PM
I know that all the Bond actors - for obvious reasons - had stunt doubles, but it also didn't help us swallow the illusion of Moore's physical prowess that his stand-ins tended to stick out like sore thumbs. Especially when he got far too old for it to be even remotely credible that his Bond was doing all this leaping and fighting (OCTOPUSSY and AVTAK).
All of which said, I'm by no means a Moore hater (I like all the actors who have played Bond equally), just agreeing with you on this particular point.
#3
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:01 PM

#4
Posted 20 October 2002 - 09:03 PM
He's the funniest Bond!
#5
Posted 20 October 2002 - 09:12 PM

I agree with pretty much everyone here. He just didn't not seem ver athletic at all. Did he do any of his own stunts? Even if he really is a strong guy he doesn't show it much.
#6
Posted 20 October 2002 - 10:32 PM
No muscles... OK! but a lot of charm and humour. And the best Bond ever and a witty and generous man.
#7
Posted 20 October 2002 - 11:26 PM
Rog was not as muscular as Van Damme, Hulk Hogan and Arnie (I can't remember how to spell his surname), but I don't think anyone could seriously argue that he is/was a skinny man.
Or maybe people think he was a tad overweight (he doesn't seem overweight to me, though I'm not a doctor. Yes I know it's odd I call my self Dr Tynan, though maybe not cause he was a dentist).
#8
Posted 21 October 2002 - 12:13 PM
So you could also say he didn't have jet black hair - but who cares?
I was reading a Money paper that said his era of Bond films was the most profitable ever with the best returns to expenditure. They'd done all the number crunching and there it was, Moore on top, Lazenby at the bottom and everyone else in between.
#9
Posted 21 October 2002 - 01:45 PM
This is also an interesting topic for the people who complain Brosnan is too slight, and Dalton to some degree.
#10
Posted 26 October 2002 - 03:12 AM
After all, it was that *other* guy who bent steel in his bare hands and tossed hats to break statues. Fleming never wrote Bond as a superhuman muscleman -- the only superpower he seemed to have was the ability to survive getting the **** kicked out of him in every book despite a "fitness regimen".
Roger may not be a Hercules, but he is definitely "cool." No threat seems to ruffle him, no danger makes him sweat. In fact, his usual reaction when threatened with a horrible death is to infuriate his tormentor even further with some smart-*** remark. Now that is what makes Bond, Bond. Any action hero can beat someone up, but only one can do it while holding a smoking gun in one hand, and a beautiful women with a dry martini in the other...
#11
Posted 26 October 2002 - 12:54 PM
#12
Posted 26 October 2002 - 01:54 PM
#13
Posted 27 October 2002 - 01:24 AM
That being said, yes Bond has to be physical, but even Fleming's Bond wasn't doing the insane stunts that the cinematic ones are doing. His Bond was one of quiet action, and I think RM wanted to go in that direction, but again, the scripts did not support that.
What Moore tried to do, was show Bond using his head by being witty. Occasionally the one liners got to be too much, and this was another problem with his canon. So what is the take home message here? It's the writing that killed Moore's Bond, not his lack of physical prowness.
-- Xenobia
#14
Posted 27 October 2002 - 01:37 AM
I know Rog's Bond had a heap of one-liners, mostly bad.
But I'll issue a challange because im curious. Can anyone come up with a film with more genuine one liners the Connery in Thunderball? If you watch it, the whole films full of them. And there actually some of the best in the series in my opinion.
#15
Posted 27 October 2002 - 01:58 AM
#16
Posted 27 October 2002 - 02:22 AM
No, I've got a better idea, lets look at him in YOLT in his grey ninja suit, with him tummy buldging out.Lets look at Sean Connery in YOLT when he is chasing Aki.
Lazenby's too thin, IMO, I really can't see what his appeal is.Lets look at George Lazenby overall throughout OHMSS.
It's the writing that killed Moore's Bond, not his lack of physical prowness.
Nobody killed Moore's Bond, Moore's Bond rocked, represents the old fashioned good time at it's peak, who wouldn't want to be Moore's Bond, all the cool one liners, getting the girls, giving the villians elaborate deaths. I know allot of people prefer to have Bond get betrayed, get personally involved in every mission and be all emotional, but I consider Moore and Bond to be what the cinema Bond is all about.
#17
Posted 27 October 2002 - 03:22 AM
#18
Posted 27 October 2002 - 03:23 AM
You are absolutely right...Moore was the ultimate in Bond...catch the bad guys, bed the girls, have fun, call it day. I do prefer a tad more edge to my Bond...but for fifteen years Roger Moore was my man, and no one is going to top his record of making movies and bedding the girls.
-- Xenobia
#19
Posted 27 October 2002 - 04:56 AM
- Bonds reaction when Anya mentions Mrs Bond (TSWLM)
- Bond talks about "digging two graves" (FYEO)
- Bond kicks the car over the edge (FYEO)
- Bond gets revenge for 009 (OP)
- Bond / Octopussys father backstory (OP)
I wouldn't say Moore or the Moore Bond films are totally lacking in depth either, agents friends and enemies die, there are serious moments and whatnot, it's just that they play second fiddle to the main goings on, they are just little, but crucial moments.
#20
Posted 31 October 2002 - 11:30 PM
Oh well he's still awesome
#21
Posted 01 November 2002 - 03:52 PM
#22
Posted 03 November 2002 - 10:51 PM
#23
Posted 04 November 2002 - 01:11 AM
Even Russell Crowe would have handled the Bond contract thing better. He could have actually told the producers to **** themselves.
#24
Posted 04 November 2002 - 02:21 AM
Give Roger a break. Despite his incredible fear of heights, he sucked it up and scaled that rock face in FYEO. Connery was never required to do anything like that.
Having said that, Roger was very inconsistent in terms of his stage-fighting techniques. Some of the choreography in MR was simply terrible, and the fight in the horse stall in AVTAK is possibly the fakest-looking movie fistfight of all time. Strangely enough, however, he was in top form just one film before in Octopussy.
#25
Posted 04 November 2002 - 03:46 AM

#26
Posted 07 November 2002 - 03:22 AM
Just kidding.
#27
Posted 07 November 2002 - 03:39 AM
Originally posted by IrishCrown
Hey, let's start another thread everyone! Which James Bond actor fought the most like a girl?
Just kidding.
I think I know what your answer would be

#28
Posted 07 November 2002 - 03:51 AM
#29
Posted 08 November 2002 - 04:46 PM
Moore was my first Bond. The first Bond film I ever watched was Octopussy. Next was Live and Let Die.
#30
Posted 09 November 2002 - 01:09 PM