
Kronsteen - unlucky to die?
#1
Posted 06 July 2009 - 12:51 AM
His plan almost worked. In fact, if Grant hadn't been so greedy and full of himself, it would have worked. Yet, he pays the ultimate price. Surely Blofeld should have given him a second chance?
It's not often you get a great chess master to work for you, and I always assume he had enough plusses against his name than minuses.
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:03 AM
Some of the SPECTRE operatives who died as a result of failures were more deserving - I think of Count Lippe in particular. Sadly, we didn't get one of these in OHMSS, although they were played out by then. There was a great one in the book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the alergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
But Krosteen seems like he would have been a valuable ally with his cunning as opposed to a Lippe or a Quist or Ms. Brandt.
And it also makes you think, Blofeld was the one who put all this together to begin with, shouldn't he off himself at some point?

#3
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:03 AM
I agree completely;
gotta admit that was a damn fine plan he came up with..
unlucky bastard.
#4
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:13 AM
Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.

Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...

#5
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:26 AM
Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
#6
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:29 AM
Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...

Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.
#7
Posted 06 July 2009 - 01:58 AM
Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.
Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.
#8
Posted 06 July 2009 - 02:13 AM
I know, but even then, it was only Grant and Klebb who got the boot.Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.
#9
Posted 06 July 2009 - 02:40 AM
I know, but even then, it was only Grant and Klebb who got the boot.Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.
Aren't we forgetting someone else?
#10
Posted 06 July 2009 - 02:49 AM
Oh... you mean Benz, right? In the book, I was confused as to whether or not Benz and Kerim had actually murdered each other, or whether Grant (or someone else) had killed them both, like in the movie.Aren't we forgetting someone else?I know, but even then, it was only Grant and Klebb who got the boot.Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.

#11
Posted 06 July 2009 - 03:38 AM
Oh... you mean Benz, right? In the book, I was confused as to whether or not Benz and Kerim had actually murdered each other, or whether Grant (or someone else) had killed them both, like in the movie.Aren't we forgetting someone else?I know, but even then, it was only Grant and Klebb who got the boot.Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.
#12
Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:43 AM
Yeah, I agree. The whole point of his death is kind of the shock of Klebb getting the second chance and not Kronsteen.
Some of the SPECTRE operatives who died as a result of failures were more deserving - I think of Count Lippe in particular.
Exactly right.
Also the SPECTRE agent at the start of Thunderball deserved it too, but surely by then Blofeld was wishing he had spared Kronsteen?
#13
Posted 06 July 2009 - 07:17 AM
#14
Posted 06 July 2009 - 07:51 AM
#15
Posted 07 July 2009 - 12:00 AM
Tactically, Kronsteen's death was a bad move by Blofeld. But story-wise, it foreshadows the threat of Klebb's poisoned shoe as she attempts to kick the life out of Bond.
Yes, sums it up nicely.
#16
Posted 07 July 2009 - 12:03 AM
Oh... you mean Benz, right? In the book, I was confused as to whether or not Benz and Kerim had actually murdered each other, or whether Grant (or someone else) had killed them both, like in the movie.Aren't we forgetting someone else?I know, but even then, it was only Grant and Klebb who got the boot.Well in the book it was SMERSH not SPECTRE.Erm... now it's a bit of a run-on sentence, but who am I to judge?Didn't come out the way I'd hoped, but it's fixed now.Erm... that was OHMSS.The book where the traitorous guard who bothers one of the allergy patients going down the bobsled run would have been interesting.
Either way, I think YOLT took what was a pretty defining nasty streak in SPECTRE and turned it into self-parody. "KEEEL BOND! NAAHHH!" put it pretty far over the top...
Anywho, at least in the film it gave more than one member of the conspiracy behind Bond's death their just desserts; in the book, Kronsteen gets off scot-clean.Spoiler
#17
Posted 07 July 2009 - 12:57 AM
Bad move, but it leads to one of the better lines that doesn't get much love from fans:Tactically, Kronsteen's death was a bad move by Blofeld. But story-wise, it foreshadows the threat of Klebb's poisoned shoe as she attempts to kick the life out of Bond.
Blofeld: "One day we must invent a faster working venom."
#18
Posted 13 July 2009 - 12:03 PM
Bad move, but it leads to one of the better lines that doesn't get much love from fans:Tactically, Kronsteen's death was a bad move by Blofeld. But story-wise, it foreshadows the threat of Klebb's poisoned shoe as she attempts to kick the life out of Bond.
Blofeld: "One day we must invent a faster working venom."
Sure, but he could have used the same sentence if Klebb got killed.
Anyway, I agree Kronsteen's killing was a bad move, we saw too little of Vladek Sheybal's Kronsteen in the movie, I thought it was an interesting character that deserved more screentime.
#19
Posted 26 July 2009 - 11:43 PM
Edited by 007Bond007, 26 July 2009 - 11:51 PM.
#20
Posted 27 July 2009 - 04:23 PM
Blofeld is an intelligent man although crazy and with all intents and purposes, Kronsteen's plan was pretty damn good. The plan failing was a factor he couldn't control; surely Blofeld was sane enough to understand this? Anyway, with Bond foiling SPECTRE's plans yet again and with SPECTRE now losing credibility with its clients, the last thing Blofeld probably needed to hear was some smug, super know it all, getting all pompous in the midst of their failure.
Kronsteen should have kept his mouth shut.
#21
Posted 28 July 2009 - 06:35 AM
I personally feel that Kronsteen was killed at the last minute due to his innapropriate smug arrogance. When he asked who is Bond compared to Kronsteen, I think it's possible to assume that Blofeld may have signalled off screen for Morenzy to kill off Kronsteen for such a badly timed comment.
Blofeld is an intelligent man although crazy and with all intents and purposes, Kronsteen's plan was pretty damn good. The plan failing was a factor he couldn't control; surely Blofeld was sane enough to understand this? Anyway, with Bond foiling SPECTRE's plans yet again and with SPECTRE now losing credibility with its clients, the last thing Blofeld probably needed to hear was some smug, super know it all, getting all pompous in the midst of their failure.
Kronsteen should have kept his mouth shut.
Yes, that could have been the reason. I still think he deserved another go.
#22
Posted 28 July 2009 - 09:49 AM
The second reason why he was killed was to give the operative Klebb an extra incentive not to fail this time.
Granted, all this only makes sense if Kronsteen was more like a hired planner than a key member of Spectre (after all, he's "number 5" in the Spectre hierarchy).
Edited by the villain's architect, 28 July 2009 - 09:54 AM.
#23
Posted 28 July 2009 - 12:11 PM
Kronsteen is highly visible within SPECTRE as the architect of the Lektor scheme and it is well known he has the full support of Blofeld. When his plan fails -- regardless of the reasons -- it reflects on Blofeld as much as himself. If Blofeld is to maintain his iron grip on the organization, he can't afford to have the stink of failure on him. And so, by killing Kronsteen, he washes his hands of the whole affair and silences anyone who might have dared whispered, "Well you know, Blofeld picked that guy in the first place..."
Politicians throw their best underlings under the bus all the time to save their own skins, and the higher up the sacrificial lamb, the more "cleansing" an act it is for the top guy. This is true not only for banana republics and Arab strongmen, but also for residents of the Oval Office and I suspect other leading nations of the free world. It may not make sense from a business or military point of view, but politically it's straight out of the standard play book.
#24
Posted 28 July 2009 - 03:10 PM
Failing to take the enemy's capabilities into account is a pretty big failure, don't you think?
#25
Posted 28 July 2009 - 03:33 PM
You know, that just put an image in my head: Kronsteen sweatily trying to jab Bond with the poisoned shoe in the hotel room while disguised as a porter. Can you imagine what that would've been like?Sure, but he could have used the same sentence if Klebb got killed.Bad move, but it leads to one of the better lines that doesn't get much love from fans:Tactically, Kronsteen's death was a bad move by Blofeld. But story-wise, it foreshadows the threat of Klebb's poisoned shoe as she attempts to kick the life out of Bond.
Blofeld: "One day we must invent a faster working venom."

#26
Posted 28 July 2009 - 06:29 PM
I think it's a political move.
Kronsteen is highly visible within SPECTRE as the architect of the Lektor scheme and it is well known he has the full support of Blofeld. When his plan fails -- regardless of the reasons -- it reflects on Blofeld as much as himself. If Blofeld is to maintain his iron grip on the organization, he can't afford to have the stink of failure on him. And so, by killing Kronsteen, he washes his hands of the whole affair and silences anyone who might have dared whispered, "Well you know, Blofeld picked that guy in the first place..."
Politicians throw their best underlings under the bus all the time to save their own skins, and the higher up the sacrificial lamb, the more "cleansing" an act it is for the top guy. This is true not only for banana republics and Arab strongmen, but also for residents of the Oval Office and I suspect other leading nations of the free world. It may not make sense from a business or military point of view, but politically it's straight out of the standard play book.
As always, well said David_M