Morgan, Purvis & Wade to Work on Bond 23!
#241
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:21 PM
#242
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:24 PM
Kind of the definition of writing really...I'm skeptical that there was any story arc sketched out from Cr to QOS and 23. The whole thing seemed to be made up as they went along.
I think they loosely planned to have the same oraganisation backing the villains in each of Craig's films, but apart from that i think you're right.
#243
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:27 PM
Fine. Be sceptical. There's no harm in that. Though there was a story arc set out LONG before SOLACE. And I say that with a certain confidence.I'm skeptical that there was any story arc sketched out from Cr to QOS and 23. The whole thing seemed to be made up as they went along.
#244
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:31 PM
#245
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:53 PM
#246
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:59 PM
Agreed.not forget P&W did write Let Him Have It one of the finest British films ever made.
Though they have yet to better that nearly twenty years on. I'm not quite sure JOHNNY ENGLISH reaches the heights of LET HIM HAVE IT... but horses for courses...
#247
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:03 PM
Though they have yet to better that nearly twenty years on. I'm not quite sure JOHNNY ENGLISH reaches the heights of LET HIM HAVE IT... but horses for courses...
Apparantly their draft of Johnny English is nothing like the final film and the only reason they have a credit is because the intial story idea was theirs. I can't quite remember where i read that, possible an Empire article.
What i find interesting is that of the four Bond films P&W have done so far, the one that seemed to have had the least interference officially was Casino Royale, you know, the critically acclaimed one. With TWINE there where quite a few writers had a crack at it after them. Tamahori GLOATS in a few interviews at the time on the amount of stuff he changed and added to Die Another Day's script(most importatnly he added THAT tsunami scene against the judgement of MGW according to his interview in i think it was Total Film). Accoriding to Haggis and the producers, PH just did a dialogue polish for CR, but then for QOS he was given alot more input as he was suggesting story ideas and wrote several drafts, before it was further re-written during the shoot.
Basically what i'm saying is, i dont get all the hate towards them, when the problems with the films they've written hasnt been done by them, and the film where most of their draft survived is the one which has proven to be the most popular.
Edited by Orion, 19 June 2009 - 05:06 PM.
#248
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:23 PM
Though they have yet to better that nearly twenty years on. I'm not quite sure JOHNNY ENGLISH reaches the heights of LET HIM HAVE IT... but horses for courses...
Apparantly their draft of Johnny English is nothing like the final film and the only reason they have a credit is because the intial story idea was theirs. I can't quite remember where i read that, possible an Empire article.
What i find interesting is that of the four Bond films P&W have done so far, the one that seemed to have had the least interference officially was Casino Royale, you know, the critically acclaimed one. With TWINE there where quite a few writers had a crack at it after them. Tamahori GLOATS in a few interviews at the time on the amount of stuff he changed and added to Die Another Day's script(most importatnly he added THAT tsunami scene against the judgement of MGW according to his interview in i think it was Total Film). Accoriding to Haggis and the producers, PH just did a dialogue polish for CR, but then for QOS he was given alot more input as he was suggesting stryo ideas and wrote several drafts, before it was further re-written during the shoot.
Basically what i'm saying is, i dont get all the hate towards them, when the problems with the films they've written hasnt been done by them, and the film where most of their draft survived is the one which has proven to be the most popular.
Surprised about the Johnny English not being all theirs, as there are similar elements in that film to DAD.
A quote from Empire magazine I posted earlier on this thread suggests it was P&W that actually came up with the ideas for DAD's ending after Tamahori originated the change in script.
I don't hate P&W, but I find it very difficult to forgive them for some of the awful schoolboy dialogue in DAD. I think that is their biggest downfall, and as far as I am aware that script was all theirs (inasmuch as a film script can be fully written by the screen credited writers).
I would really love to know who wrote what from TWINE onwards so I can make a fully informed judgement on P&W writing skills.
#249
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:27 PM
Though they have yet to better that nearly twenty years on. I'm not quite sure JOHNNY ENGLISH reaches the heights of LET HIM HAVE IT... but horses for courses...
Apparantly their draft of Johnny English is nothing like the final film and the only reason they have a credit is because the intial story idea was theirs. I can't quite remember where i read that, possible an Empire article.
What i find interesting is that of the four Bond films P&W have done so far, the one that seemed to have had the least interference officially was Casino Royale, you know, the critically acclaimed one. With TWINE there where quite a few writers had a crack at it after them. Tamahori GLOATS in a few interviews at the time on the amount of stuff he changed and added to Die Another Day's script(most importatnly he added THAT tsunami scene against the judgement of MGW according to his interview in i think it was Total Film). Accoriding to Haggis and the producers, PH just did a dialogue polish for CR, but then for QOS he was given alot more input as he was suggesting stryo ideas and wrote several drafts, before it was further re-written during the shoot.
Basically what i'm saying is, i dont get all the hate towards them, when the problems with the films they've written hasnt been done by them, and the film where most of their draft survived is the one which has proven to be the most popular.
Surprised about the Johnny English not being all theirs, as there are similar elements in that film to DAD.
A quote from Empire magazine I posted earlier on this thread suggests it was P&W that actually came up with the ideas for DAD's ending after Tamahori originated the change in script.
I don't hate P&W, but I find it very difficult to forgive them for some of the awful schoolboy dialogue in DAD. I think that is their biggest downfall, and as far as I am aware that script was all theirs (inasmuch as a film script can be fully written by the screen credited writers).
I would really love to know who wrote what from TWINE onwards so I can make a fully informed judgement on P&W writing skills.
Well i know that Apted's wife wrote some of TWINE uncredited, it would be fascinating to know how much was changed from P&W's intial draft.
#250
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:34 PM
#251
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:35 PM
Yeah, she did the dialogue polish/writing scenes with some of the female characters in TWINE as far as I know.Well i know that Apted's wife wrote some of TWINE uncredited, it would be fascinating to know how much was changed from P&W's intial draft.
#252
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:38 PM
No really, i was reading an aritcle about TWINE and it said "Michael Apted's wife" contributed.What! Apted's wife? If your referring to Dana Stevens, then she isn't Apted's wife and she did an uncredited polish on the TWINE.
#253
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:38 PM
Sorry - but she is Apted's wife and did tidy up / enhance the female perspective of THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH...What! Apted's wife? If your referring to Dana Stevens, then she isn't Apted's wife and she did an uncredited polish on the TWINE.
http://www.dga.org/m...6/pages/021.htm
#254
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:51 PM
Sorry - but she is Apted's wife and did tidy up / enhance the female perspective of THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH...What! Apted's wife? If your referring to Dana Stevens, then she isn't Apted's wife and she did an uncredited polish on the TWINE.
http://www.dga.org/m...6/pages/021.htm
Urghhh. How many more bloody ghost writers are going to pop out the woodwork?
Anyone heard the expression:
#255
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:51 PM
Sorry - but she is Apted's wife and did tidy up / enhance the female perspective of THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH...What! Apted's wife? If your referring to Dana Stevens, then she isn't Apted's wife and she did an uncredited polish on the TWINE.
http://www.dga.org/m...6/pages/021.htm
Well that's a new one on me.
#256
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:53 PM
"Apted still wanted more work on the character of Elektra. He felt the film would only work if her relationship with Bond worked. The studio suggested that the director's wife, Dana Stevens, who had written City of Angels and more recently The Love Game [....] would be the ideal person to do this.
Its almost the norm in pictures of this size to customise the writers for certain elements. There seemed to be no hard feelings as Purvis and Wade handed over to Dana Stevens. They had laid down the bedrock plot and it was indicated to them that they would be welcome aboard the next Bond film".
Edited by sthgilyadgnivileht, 19 June 2009 - 05:55 PM.
#257
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:55 PM
The World Is Not Enough Companion Guide by Iain Johnson reads
"Apted still wanted more work on the character of Elektra. He felt the film would only work if her relationship with Bond worked..."
Shame he never got round to it then.
#258
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:07 PM
Yeah, the film certainly never 'worked' for me.....The World Is Not Enough Companion Guide by Iain Johnson reads
"Apted still wanted more work on the character of Elektra. He felt the film would only work if her relationship with Bond worked..."
Shame he never got round to it then.
#259
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:26 PM
But there you go. Too many cooks spoiling the broth, as usual.
#260
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:48 PM
Apparantly their draft of Johnny English is nothing like the final film and the only reason they have a credit is because the intial story idea was theirs. I can't quite remember where i read that, possible an Empire article.
Sounds like a common theme with P&W's carreer, shame.
#261
Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:29 AM
It wasn't as bad as what happened to their draft of The Italian Job (theres a reason they don't get a credit)Apparantly their draft of Johnny English is nothing like the final film and the only reason they have a credit is because the intial story idea was theirs. I can't quite remember where i read that, possible an Empire article.
Sounds like a common theme with P&W's carreer, shame.
#262
Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:51 PM
He is known for Political work as well as younger versus older. So perhaps this means Guy Haines will be the main villain of bond 23 or at the very least a more integral part of bond 23.
What do u think?
#263
Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:18 PM
And, according to Apted, Feirstein's draft gave him "Bond".The World Is Not Enough Companion Guide by Iain Johnson reads:
"Apted still wanted more work on the character of Elektra. He felt the film would only work if her relationship with Bond worked. The studio suggested that the director's wife, Dana Stevens, who had written City of Angels and more recently The Love Game [....] would be the ideal person to do this.
Its almost the norm in pictures of this size to customise the writers for certain elements. There seemed to be no hard feelings as Purvis and Wade handed over to Dana Stevens. They had laid down the bedrock plot and it was indicated to them that they would be welcome aboard the next Bond film".
I wouldn't mind if Bruce Feirstein did a polish on B23. These films needs some good humor.
#264
Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:24 PM
They do, but Feirstein doesn't know the first thing about good humor.I wouldn't mind if Bruce Feirstein did a polish on B23. These films needs some good humor.
#265
Posted 22 June 2009 - 12:13 AM
A quote from Empire magazine I posted earlier on this thread suggests it was P&W that actually came up with the ideas for DAD's ending after Tamahori originated the change in script.
Precisely. He also came up with the idea for Gustav Graves' robocop suit. Initially, it was always going to be a gadget, but Tamahori decided he wanted it to be an entire outfit.
#266
Posted 22 June 2009 - 12:49 AM
1. Purvis & Wade deliver first draft. In this version, the pre-credits sequence first takes place in Cuba (source: Michael Apted commentary on TWINE DVD).
2. Dana Stevens does second draft. Her version has pre-credits version first taking place in Geneva (so the Swiss banker stuff makes more sense).
3. Bruce Feirstein takes over. The pre-credits sequence is changed to Bilbao. Apted, in his DVD commentary, comments about the changing locale, mostly because the museum in Bilbao was so spectacular. The final version of the movie also contains a set piece that was in Feirstein's initial draft of Tomorrow Never Dies, where Bond stabs a knife through a thug's bowtie while simulatneously causing the thug to lose his footing. I also remember reading a Brosnan interview saying that Feirstein was the last writer to work on the script.
#267
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:12 PM
Producers Michael G. Wilson & Barbara Broccoli
Writers Peter Morgan & Neal Purvis & Robert Wade
Director Christopher Nolan
#268
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:17 PM
i wouldn't mind that not one bitI have it all palnned out in my mind:
Producers Michael G. Wilson & Barbara Broccoli
Writers Peter Morgan & Neal Purvis & Robert Wade
Director Christopher Nolan
Slap the hildebrand rarity on that film and i'm very happy
#269
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:21 PM
#270
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:28 AM
Who needs another tiresome, amateur script by Purvis and Wade just like their last four tiresome, amateur scripts.
Who needs them?
Peter Morgan is a brilliant playwrite and screenwriter.
He is also distinctly British, which is important.
He doesn't need help.
He can write a much better Bond script without Purvis and Wade.
If Eon has Morgan, they should dump Purvis and Wade.
Let some fresh air in for a change.
Richard

