Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Morgan, Purvis & Wade to Work on Bond 23!


625 replies to this topic

#361 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:30 AM

Neil Purvis and Robert Wade are writing the script with Peter Morgan. The latter is not - as Paul Haggis was not - some mythical "script doctor" who comes in and cleans up the project at the end. And as the film will not emerge for a while, that seems plenty of time to iron out and chisle the script into something all are happy with.


Well, dear Zorin, I hope you´re right. But a director will try to put his stamp on the material. Maybe EON will choose a more workman-like director this time or they will control him more so that the script does not have to be re-written totally.

As to the process of collaboration, I understand that Haggis indeed was not "just" a script doctor but he was the second writer on CR and QOS (counting Purvis/Wade as one, since they do write together). Morgan seems to do just that as well - going in after Purvis/Wade have written a first draft. Or do you have intel that says otherwise?

#362 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 03 October 2009 - 08:50 PM

i have one extremly simple question


Are they currently writing bond 23 right now as we type or will they begin duties soon?

#363 double o ego

double o ego

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1261 posts
  • Location:London, England

Posted 04 October 2009 - 12:51 PM

Work on the script began months ago.

#364 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 03:37 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

#365 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 04 October 2009 - 03:54 PM

Because we don't need to be aware of every aspect of the production...


Michael G Wilson: Oh yeah, is it done? Right the first draft is completed people! Well done. Oh, we should just go and tell quantumofsolace007, you know, just to keep HIM updated.

#366 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 04 October 2009 - 04:03 PM

Because we don't need to be aware of every aspect of the production...


Sadly. B)

#367 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 04:12 PM

Because we don't need to be aware of every aspect of the production...


Absolutely. We don't need to be, nor should we be, in the loop in terms of every aspect surrounding the production. I'd say that we should just leave the writers alone so that they can get their work done rather than demanding constant status updates from them in terms of how many pages they've completed.

#368 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 04:40 PM

Because we don't need to be aware of every aspect of the production...


Michael G Wilson: Oh yeah, is it done? Right the first draft is completed people! Well done. Oh, we should just go and tell quantumofsolace007, you know, just to keep HIM updated.

I wish the world worked liked that ... maybe it does B)

#369 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 04 October 2009 - 04:42 PM

Anyway, I thought you of all people should be updated. You know, since you have a contact in MGM. Apparently.

#370 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 05:40 PM

Anyway, I thought you of all people should be updated. You know, since you have a contact in MGM. Apparently.



And if i bug him every time i weant to know bond stuff I think our friendship will end rather fast don't you.

#371 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 06:40 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

Because it's no-one's business. And these things take time. There is no story, no hook for the public - not even the fans I'm afraid.

#372 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 06:52 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

Because it's no-one's business. And these things take time. There is no story, no hook for the public - not even the fans I'm afraid.

I suppose your right. Like with the bond video game people don't want to see the test designs etc they want to see the full game.

#373 Orion

Orion

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1579 posts
  • Location:Great Britain (rule Britania)

Posted 04 October 2009 - 06:52 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

Because it's no-one's business. And these things take time. There is no story, no hook for the public - not even the fans I'm afraid.

Exactly, the next update on production probably won't be until a director is hired.

#374 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 06:55 PM

There are some hurdles to iron out first though.

#375 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 04 October 2009 - 06:58 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

Because it's no-one's business. And these things take time. There is no story, no hook for the public - not even the fans I'm afraid.

Exactly, the next update on production probably won't be until a director is hired.

it is interesting how i'm really the new kid on the block with these things for bond 22 we had a title rumour extremly early We found out when the first draft was done and we had a list of possible directors for bond 23 we have none of that and it's interesting you all are acting as if this is the norm (hearing nothing) Yet I'm just going on past experience.

#376 double o ego

double o ego

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1261 posts
  • Location:London, England

Posted 04 October 2009 - 08:00 PM

But it is normal though. Just because we may have had updates come early for QoS, it doesn't mean it'll be exactly the same for Bond 23. Hell, QoS was riding on the back of the highly popular CR so the momentum to keep Bond in full swing was on rapid fire and there was also the fact that the writer's strike was happening so things were kind of rushed.

With QoS being a financial success but leaving audiences polarised and with no writer's strike to contend with, Eon can now take the time to come back fresh from the busy and hectic schedules of both CR and QoS and also prepare a much better and sharper script. Sometimes absense makes the ehart grow fonder. I'm sure we'll get more info on the film's production soon enough but as it is, MGM are going through some hard times but with the time available, completing a sharp and compelling script is priority without the stress of rushing things for an early deadline.

#377 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 04 October 2009 - 09:26 PM

Work on the script began months ago.


then why haven't we gotten any reportts on drafts being completed?

Because it's no-one's business. And these things take time. There is no story, no hook for the public - not even the fans I'm afraid.

Exactly, the next update on production probably won't be until a director is hired.

it is interesting how i'm really the new kid on the block with these things for bond 22 we had a title rumour extremly early We found out when the first draft was done and we had a list of possible directors for bond 23 we have none of that and it's interesting you all are acting as if this is the norm (hearing nothing) Yet I'm just going on past experience.


Yeah but you're past experience is QoS. A movie that came out two years after the last film. This time they're not going with the 2 year turn around, so it's going to take a bit longer to start hearing solid news. To be honest I don't expect to hear anything for another year, which is why I don't hang around these forums that much in the "off time."

#378 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 12:14 AM

it's interesting you all are acting as if this is the norm (hearing nothing)


That's because it has always been this way with EON. Very little comes out of their offices regarding the new film until within a few months of filming. We're currently well over a year away from that point, so I doubt that we'll hear anything until at least sometime next summer. The only possible thing that we could hear before then would potentially be the hiring of a director, but outside of that, I'm not expecting any news until sometime in the summer of 2010, if we even get news then. Until then, Purvis, Wade, and Morgan will be spending their time writing a script, of which we'll get no updates as to its progress (until, possibly, a final draft is turned in, which we may or may not hear about).

#379 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 05 October 2009 - 05:10 AM

Well said tdalton.

Indeed it is the norm. Imagine if this website were around back during the 6 year hiatus between 89 and 95. Quantumofsolace007 would be B)ting himself at the lack of updates on the film :tdown:

#380 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 05:34 AM

Bond forums can go without a new film for quite a lengthy period, we do have an extensive back catalogue to discuss. Not many franchises can boast that. We are blessed in that regard. But even then, the hype and excitement a new film generates cannot be denied.

#381 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 12:40 PM

Well said tdalton.

Indeed it is the norm. Imagine if this website were around back during the 6 year hiatus between 89 and 95. Quantumofsolace007 would be B)ting himself at the lack of updates on the film :tdown:

uhm in 1989 i was 2 turning 3 in 95 i was 8 turning 9 I was just watching batman and power rangers so even if there were websites around then i wouldn't of cared or said much.

#382 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 12:45 PM

Well said tdalton.

Indeed it is the norm. Imagine if this website were around back during the 6 year hiatus between 89 and 95. Quantumofsolace007 would be B)ting himself at the lack of updates on the film :tdown:

uhm in 1989 i was 2 turning 3 in 95 i was 8 turning 9 I was just watching batman and power rangers so even if there were websites around then i wouldn't of cared or said much.

"Order of irony, table three!"

#383 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 05 October 2009 - 02:43 PM

Bond forums can go without a new film for quite a lengthy period, we do have an extensive back catalogue to discuss. Not many franchises can boast that.


Quite true.
Now where is that "what color jumpsuits should the villains in Bond 23 wear" thread? B)

#384 Panavision

Panavision

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 137 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 07:25 PM

I still find it odd that three writers were announced to write Bond 23. What's Peter Morgan bringing to the table that Purvis and Wade are not able to?

#385 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 05 October 2009 - 07:44 PM

I still find it odd that three writers were announced to write Bond 23. What's Peter Morgan bringing to the table that Purvis and Wade are not able to?


While I think that Morgan will certainly do much more than a polish of P&W's work on the script, I do think that his involvement was brought about because of the success that EON has had with outside writers teaming up with P&W on the last two scripts. Although I'm not a fan of all of the things that Haggis added and deleted from the Casino Royale script, his involvement did help bring instant credibility to the project. Since he's no longer on board, they've turned to Peter Morgan to help P&W craft a good storyline and a good script. More simply, he's there because he's a critically acclaimed screenwriter, and it definitely is a good thing to have someone of that quality working on the script.

#386 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 06 October 2009 - 01:19 AM

I still find it odd that three writers were announced to write Bond 23. What's Peter Morgan bringing to the table that Purvis and Wade are not able to?


While I think that Morgan will certainly do much more than a polish of P&W's work on the script, I do think that his involvement was brought about because of the success that EON has had with outside writers teaming up with P&W on the last two scripts. Although I'm not a fan of all of the things that Haggis added and deleted from the Casino Royale script, his involvement did help bring instant credibility to the project. Since he's no longer on board, they've turned to Peter Morgan to help P&W craft a good storyline and a good script. More simply, he's there because he's a critically acclaimed screenwriter, and it definitely is a good thing to have someone of that quality working on the script.


I'm curious if he was brought on for more than just that he tend to write politcal drama and one of Quantum's operatives is one of the prime ministers closest advisors.

#387 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 06 October 2009 - 02:11 AM

I agree that we don't really know how good or bad Purvis & Wade are, but I do know that they have poncy hair.

#388 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:49 AM

I'm curious if he was brought on for more than just that he tend to write politcal drama and one of Quantum's operatives is one of the prime ministers closest advisors.



Hmm, maybe M. Night will be brought in cause he wrote a movie with Jeffrey Wright in it. Why not? That follows your line of reasoning.

#389 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:58 AM

I'm curious if he was brought on for more than just that he tend to write politcal drama and one of Quantum's operatives is one of the prime ministers closest advisors.



Hmm, maybe M. Night will be brought in cause he wrote a movie with Jeffrey Wright in it. Why not? That follows your line of reasoning.


Agreed, although I wouldn't be surprised if the film went down that road with Morgan as the screenwriter. I do think, however, that the sole reason that Morgan was brought in was because EON was looking for a well-respected screenwriter who could replace Paul Haggis and still bring a similar quality of work to the proceedings.

#390 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 06 October 2009 - 09:44 AM

I still find it odd that three writers were announced to write Bond 23. What's Peter Morgan bringing to the table that Purvis and Wade are not able to?


While I think that Morgan will certainly do much more than a polish of P&W's work on the script, I do think that his involvement was brought about because of the success that EON has had with outside writers teaming up with P&W on the last two scripts. Although I'm not a fan of all of the things that Haggis added and deleted from the Casino Royale script, his involvement did help bring instant credibility to the project. Since he's no longer on board, they've turned to Peter Morgan to help P&W craft a good storyline and a good script. More simply, he's there because he's a critically acclaimed screenwriter, and it definitely is a good thing to have someone of that quality working on the script.


I'm curious if he was brought on for more than just that he tend to write politcal drama and one of Quantum's operatives is one of the prime ministers closest advisors.

Well I will divulge something here...

Peter Morgan is co-writing a Bond film where the villain is a 1960's Governmental lawyer struggling with his conscience who starts to manage a Northern football team before reluctantly becoming Henry VIII's doomed lover. THAT is why Peter Morgan came on board.

I still find it odd that three writers were announced to write Bond 23. What's Peter Morgan bringing to the table that Purvis and Wade are not able to?


While I think that Morgan will certainly do much more than a polish of P&W's work on the script, I do think that his involvement was brought about because of the success that EON has had with outside writers teaming up with P&W on the last two scripts. Although I'm not a fan of all of the things that Haggis added and deleted from the Casino Royale script, his involvement did help bring instant credibility to the project. Since he's no longer on board, they've turned to Peter Morgan to help P&W craft a good storyline and a good script. More simply, he's there because he's a critically acclaimed screenwriter, and it definitely is a good thing to have someone of that quality working on the script.

Peter Morgan is NOT working as a script doctor or polisher. He is co-writing a script with Neil Purvis and Robert Wade. It is a collaborative process all the way and has been since they started work together on the piece.