The excitment is just unbelievable. I have not seen the movie on DVD in a while. I can only imagine what an epic this movie will be on the BIG SCREEN.
'Review' to follow!

Posted 22 January 2009 - 03:56 PM
Posted 22 January 2009 - 04:01 PM
Posted 22 January 2009 - 04:01 PM
First BOnd movie I ever saw on The Big Screen was TSWLM in 77. Have seen everyone on opening weekend ever since.
Posted 22 January 2009 - 04:08 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen, tonight I will be seeing TSWLM at the cinema for the first time in my life.
The excitment is just unbelievable. I have not seen the movie on DVD in a while. I can only imagine what an epic this movie will be on the BIG SCREEN.
'Review' to follow!
Posted 22 January 2009 - 04:45 PM
Posted 22 January 2009 - 05:38 PM
First BOnd movie I ever saw on The Big Screen was TSWLM in 77. Have seen everyone on opening weekend ever since.
Care to share some of your reflections at the time?
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:15 PM
On the big screen it's something very special. EPIC is the right word!
I saw it 3 times as a kid, then again 2 years ago at the Empire - terrible old print though, but still great to see.
They showed it digitally at the Empire last year- it looked terrific.
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:18 PM
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:53 PM
Posted 23 January 2009 - 03:06 PM
'Review' to follow!
Posted 23 January 2009 - 05:14 PM
Posted 23 January 2009 - 05:33 PM
Posted 23 January 2009 - 06:01 PM
Why? He has a lot of great scenes and good dialouge. For instance: his introduction scene, meeting with "Robert Sterling", the speech at Liparus and the end scene with Bond. He doesn't belong in the subpar category because "Subpar" for me means something that is below a certain standard. And after 22 films, I can only think of 3-4 villains that are better than Curd Jürgen's Stromberg.Stromberg is a bit subpar,
Posted 23 January 2009 - 06:47 PM
I can only think of three or four villains who are worse. Stromberg is astonishingly forgettable.And after 22 films, I can only think of 3-4 villains that are better than Curd Jürgen's Stromberg.
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:42 PM
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:48 PM
The nagging "he is just pressing buttons"-attitude is still so widespread that many fans fails to see what an effective villain Curd Jürgens created in this film. He is not the charming type of villain á la Goldfinger (instead he is much closer to Dr No/Largo). Jürgens gave a wonderful mix between self-satisfaction and ruthlessness topped with perfect line delivery.I can only think of three or four villains who are worse. Stromberg is astonishingly forgettable.And after 22 films, I can only think of 3-4 villains that are better than Curd Jürgen's Stromberg.
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:22 PM
The art direction is visually superb.
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:26 PM
I can only think of three or four villains who are worse. Stromberg is astonishingly forgettable.And after 22 films, I can only think of 3-4 villains that are better than Curd Jürgen's Stromberg.
Then we must hope, Captain, that you will suffer no further... mishap!
Only Dr No, face-less Blofeld, Goldfinger and Hugo Drax are better, IMO.
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:28 PM
I saw the digital print in the Empire last year. The PTS was awesome (the base jump really looks hair-raising on a big screen). The rest was merely ok, and actually brought TSWLM down a couple of notches for me...
Posted 26 January 2009 - 12:48 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 01:09 PM
I saw TSWLM on the big screen in Pinewood Studios. I bet not many people have seen it in the same quality as me - I watched the digital master.
Posted 27 January 2009 - 12:49 PM
I saw TSWLM on the big screen in Pinewood Studios. I bet not many people have seen it in the same quality as me - I watched the digital master.
You lucky bastard!
So, what did you think? Please feel free to provide us with some of your recollections of the event...as well as what you thought the major differences were between it and watching it on a tv.
Edited by Daylights, 27 January 2009 - 12:54 PM.
Posted 27 January 2009 - 12:53 PM
TSWLM was my first introduction to Bond way back in 1977. It's probably the most representative movie of the Bond franchise, both the good and the bad. But it's pure movie Bond. I've seen it two more times on the big screen at bond festivals, and wore out the VHS tape during my teens. It's got everything--great PTS sequence, big climactic battle, gorgeous women, a good soundtrack (even if not John Barry), excellent henchman, awesome chase scenes, pretty good dialogue, and some truly inspired gadgets. As a remake of YOLT, it's superior. Stromberg is a bit subpar, and the Lawrence of Arabia bit is too much, but those are really its only weaknesses. The art direction is visually superb.
It is not be the best Bond movie, but it gave the franchise a much needed jolt that hurtled Bond into the eighties. A bit unoriginal perhaps, but it gave the people what they wanted.
Posted 01 August 2009 - 02:43 AM
Posted 01 August 2009 - 02:59 AM
That sort of explains why he shoots Stromberg so many times...As for Stromberg, I really quite enjoy him, but I think he should have been developed a little bit more. Curt Jurgens' menacing voice and cold eyes made him the quintessential Bond villain, so much so that I think he should have been Blofeld in every single use of that character. Such a pity they couldn't have SPECTRE in TSWLM the way they wanted to.
Posted 03 August 2009 - 12:52 AM
Posted 03 August 2009 - 06:38 AM
Posted 05 August 2009 - 11:20 PM
I've seen TSWLM twice in the cinema; once nine years ago- an actual print of the film with the old Transamerica logo(very clean BTW)- and a digital copy two years ago. Audiences gasped at the ski jump both times and laughed at Roger's quips in the van.I saw the digital print in the Empire last year. The PTS was awesome (the base jump really looks hair-raising on a big screen). The rest was merely ok, and actually brought TSWLM down a couple of notches for me...
I can understand why TSWLM was brought 'down a couple of notches' for you. It's held in very high esteem and for most people it was the top Bond film between the 1960s and 1987, or perhaps even 1995 or 2002 or 2006 (depending on who you are). But in terms of overall quality of acting, 'hand-to-hand action' and some plot 'issues', it suffers in relation to, say, the current Craig era.
Still, a solid 8.25 out of 10 for me in terms of the Eon Bond canon.
I would LOVE to see a cleaned-up digital version of the film and in full surround in a large cinema.
Posted 06 August 2009 - 01:16 AM
Posted 06 August 2009 - 07:44 AM
To quote Roger Moore's James Bond, "What a handsome craft, such lovely lines."While we are talking about TSWLM and Naomi, here is a photo of her 2nd most famous role as the slave girl in The Golden Voyage of Sinbad.
![]()
![]()
![]()
.....