
Michael York as Bond
#1
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:30 PM
In his autobiography, 'Accidentally On Purpose' York said right after Logan's Run came out, in 1976 or theres about, he was approached to play Bond. He was extremely flattered but said he couldn't picture himself in the role and turned it down.
As much as I love Micheal York, Three and Four Musketeers is high on my list and don't get me started about how much I love Logan's Run or Cabaret, I can't see him as James Bond either. Though he can play a baddie on occasion, now that he's older, he's still got a naive quality about him.
Is it just me? Does anyone think York could have pulled it off?
#2
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:34 PM
in 1976 so, why approach someone then?
#3
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:41 PM

#4
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:41 PM
I can't see York as Bond, and I wonder about the timeline. Roger was filming or was due to film TSWLM
in 1976 so, why approach someone then?
That I'm not sure. York does bounce around a little in his book, so I might be wrong on the exact year. I associated it with York talking about Logan's Run which came out in '76 and he suddenly found himself very sought after. I should see if I can find my copy of Accidentally on Purpose and nail down the passage.
#5
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:47 PM
About the timeline, if he was sought after after Logan's Run, he may have been contacted in '77, with the producers thinking of a Bond film a couple of years later, i.e. in '79 or '80. This would make sense, given Roger's age.
I can't remember when the last quest for the new Bond began, but if memory serves it was about two years before Casino Royale came out, wasn't it?
#6
Posted 28 June 2008 - 11:19 PM
Perhaps they wanted him for XXX's lover; it's certainly a Bondian role...
He definitely said the Bond role, but he'd have been better suited as XXX's lover, you're right.

Well, I can't really see him as Bond either...
About the timeline, if he was sought after after Logan's Run, he may have been contacted in '77, with the producers thinking of a Bond film a couple of years later, i.e. in '79 or '80. This would make sense, given Roger's age.
I can't remember when the last quest for the new Bond began, but if memory serves it was about two years before Casino Royale came out, wasn't it?
Yes I love Michael but Bond he's not, he's too much of a sweetheart like Ioan Gruffudd.

I think the last big Bond search was the two years before Casino Royale as I assumed Brosnan was a lock because they'd wanted him for years. Boy was I wrong that day in my opinion when they chose Craig. I can't mea culpa him enough!
#7
Posted 29 June 2008 - 07:03 PM
Hmmm. It's probably best not to think about it.

#8
Posted 29 June 2008 - 07:05 PM
Michael York as Bond?
Hmmm. It's probably best not to think about it.
Good one!

#9
Posted 04 August 2008 - 10:28 PM

EDIT: Hang on..... why the hell would he be approched in 1976! Moore was contracted as Bond.

#10
Posted 04 August 2008 - 10:49 PM
I wonder how it would've worked, if he would have been in the role of Bond before his 'exposition' in that another spy series from the swinging 90's and early 00's.
edit: Here's me trying to say that I'm not that familiar with his early work.