
Whats your opinion on Max Zorin?
#1
Posted 09 November 2007 - 03:54 PM
I thought he was a powerful presence throught the whole film and the final battle with Sir Roger's Bond was great to watch.
What do you think ? do you like the character ?
#2
Posted 09 November 2007 - 04:24 PM
#3
Posted 09 November 2007 - 04:27 PM
#4
Posted 09 November 2007 - 05:59 PM
#5
Posted 09 November 2007 - 06:13 PM
#6
Posted 09 November 2007 - 08:36 PM
I think that he is quite a memorable villain as others have said but he is by no means up there with the best. Christopher Walken is a great actor but he did star in probably the weakest Bond film of the lot.
Nostalgia and that of other people's is a limiting device.
#7
Posted 09 November 2007 - 08:43 PM
#8
Posted 09 November 2007 - 08:47 PM
#9
Posted 09 November 2007 - 08:48 PM

#10
Posted 09 November 2007 - 09:28 PM
You can say the same thing about many villains. The Goldfinger connection is so extremely exaggerated. AVTAK is not a Goldfinger-remake. They are totally different.The fact that his plot is a blatant imitation of Goldfinger's mixed in with Lex Luthor and Mola Ram didn't help matters.
#11
Posted 09 November 2007 - 09:38 PM
#12
Posted 09 November 2007 - 10:09 PM
#13
Posted 09 November 2007 - 10:22 PM
Agreed. Not the greatest villain in the series, but far from the worse. Walken's plan pretty much seemed to be to laugh like a maniac at every opportunity and it works. If Stacy Sutton was babbling hysterically in my ear I'd probably just laugh too. Sure he's been more menacing in other movies since (True Romance, King of New York) but Zorin fits into this Bond adventure well. And the sixty seconds after the horse chase where he and Bond face off by the Rolls-Royce definitely brought the best out of Sir Rog.I think Zorin is the highlight of an otherwise sub-par Bond flick.
#14
Posted 09 November 2007 - 10:39 PM
#15
Posted 10 November 2007 - 04:33 AM
I'll third that. AVTAK really drags whenever Walken isn't on screen, especially that stretch in San Francisco.Agreed. Not the greatest villain in the series, but far from the worse. Walken's plan pretty much seemed to be to laugh like a maniac at every opportunity and it works. If Stacy Sutton was babbling hysterically in my ear I'd probably just laugh too. Sure he's been more menacing in other movies since (True Romance, King of New York) but Zorin fits into this Bond adventure well. And the sixty seconds after the horse chase where he and Bond face off by the Rolls-Royce definitely brought the best out of Sir Rog.I think Zorin is the highlight of an otherwise sub-par Bond flick.
#16
Posted 10 November 2007 - 01:43 PM
I'll third that. AVTAK really drags whenever Walken isn't on screen, especially that stretch in San Francisco.Agreed. Not the greatest villain in the series, but far from the worse. Walken's plan pretty much seemed to be to laugh like a maniac at every opportunity and it works. If Stacy Sutton was babbling hysterically in my ear I'd probably just laugh too. Sure he's been more menacing in other movies since (True Romance, King of New York) but Zorin fits into this Bond adventure well. And the sixty seconds after the horse chase where he and Bond face off by the Rolls-Royce definitely brought the best out of Sir Rog.I think Zorin is the highlight of an otherwise sub-par Bond flick.
And I agree aswell. The best bits of AVTAK were; Duran Duran's title song, Christopher Walken and the bridge stuff in the end.
#17
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:10 PM
#18
Posted 10 November 2007 - 03:08 PM
#19
Posted 10 November 2007 - 03:56 PM
#20
Posted 10 November 2007 - 04:16 PM
The Goldfinger connection is so extremely exaggerated. AVTAK is not a Goldfinger-remake. They are totally different.
Glad someone has finally said it.
#21
Posted 10 November 2007 - 05:15 PM
Moore was entirely wrong, Tim would have given this more dramatic and tense feel a real meeting of 2 great actors.
Although he gets one of the most outright bloodthirsty moments of the series and it's perpetrated by himself, if chucking a KGB agent in to the pipeline isn't bad enough he slaughters loads of innocent workers in coldblooded relish in the mine sequence. Undoubtedly proving his psychotic credentials.
There is an argument Randal of Clerks style, (you know the one about Jedi being darker than Empire due to contract workers etc) for suggesting VTAK contains probably the darkest moment of any Bond film in history.
#22
Posted 10 November 2007 - 05:23 PM
#23
Posted 10 November 2007 - 05:42 PM
#24
Posted 10 November 2007 - 05:53 PM
#25
Posted 10 November 2007 - 05:55 PM
#26
Posted 10 November 2007 - 06:28 PM
He is probably my least favorite villain out the the Bond movies. There's not much about AVTAK that I really like. Some things, yes, many things, no.
aren't you forgetting about Gustave Graves?
#27
Posted 12 November 2007 - 04:53 AM
#28
Posted 12 November 2007 - 07:36 AM

#29
Posted 12 November 2007 - 08:31 AM
And I also believe that Walken made a good Bond villain.
#30
Posted 13 November 2007 - 02:52 PM
The Goldfinger connection is so extremely exaggerated. AVTAK is not a Goldfinger-remake. They are totally different.
Glad someone has finally said it.
You both are joking right? Right?!
Anyway the only interesting thing about AVTAK is the interaction between Roger and Macnee and that's about it, easily the worst movie in the series. Walken's performance and character are just too wacky and off the wall to me, maybe I'd have liked the film slightly more if both were better but there's a lot more going against it than simply the villian.