
Was Steve Mcqueen considered for Bond?
#1
Posted 04 April 2007 - 07:25 PM
#2
Posted 04 April 2007 - 07:51 PM
#3
Posted 04 April 2007 - 07:53 PM
#4
Posted 04 April 2007 - 07:58 PM
#5
Posted 04 April 2007 - 08:17 PM
Anyway, I think Daniel Craig is basically Steve McQueen only British.
#6
Posted 04 April 2007 - 08:21 PM
I can imagine Craig playing McQueen in a biopic.I don't think he was ever considered because he was American.
Anyway, I think Daniel Craig is basically Steve McQueen only British.
#7
Posted 04 April 2007 - 08:50 PM
I can imagine Craig playing McQueen in a biopic.I don't think he was ever considered because he was American.
Anyway, I think Daniel Craig is basically Steve McQueen only British.
I've always thought that to be an excellent idea. I would love to see a McQueen biopic, and I think craig would fit perfectly
Edited by rogermoore007, 04 April 2007 - 08:50 PM.
#8
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:24 PM
I can imagine Craig playing McQueen in a biopic.I don't think he was ever considered because he was American.
Anyway, I think Daniel Craig is basically Steve McQueen only British.
Interesting... I think Layer Cake is as close Craig comes to being like McQueen. In fact, several reviews praised Craig for being a latter day version of him.
#9
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:43 PM
I can imagine Craig playing McQueen in a biopic.I don't think he was ever considered because he was American.
Anyway, I think Daniel Craig is basically Steve McQueen only British.
What a good thought- yes, I can see that.
As for McQueen as Bond; well yeah- he's as magnetic as they come- he'd have been an excellent star for the Bond films. But I think he might have been wasted somehow- for McQueen to have played anyone that wasn't American would have seemed just.. wrong; his coolness almost comes directly from being American.
#10
Posted 05 April 2007 - 09:54 AM
#11
Posted 05 April 2007 - 10:21 AM
#12
Posted 05 April 2007 - 10:24 AM
#13
Posted 05 April 2007 - 11:04 AM
I dunno- you can't have Leiter cooler than Bond, can you?
Yeah, that's probably why Eon's Leiter has usually been a throwaway role played by an unremarkable-looking guy. Take him as close to Bond as he is in the books, and you'd risk having him steal the show.
#14
Posted 05 April 2007 - 01:39 PM
#15
Posted 05 April 2007 - 02:48 PM
#16
Posted 05 April 2007 - 02:55 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
I've heard that too. 5'10 may be a reach...I think Norman Jewison shot him at odd angles(floor up) in certain scenes...in TCA, I didn't notice he looked shortish.Certainly not "tall" but Bogart wasn't tall but he was such a force...a guy with a powerful charisma and presence can overcome the tall issue...granted Sean was charismatic and tall and the press would never let Mcqueen forget it if they hired him.Ultimately, Steve Mcqueen was perhaps too big a star to take over the Bond role at the time. It would have been like Mel Gibson(another diminutive superstar) doing Bond in '87 or '95...maybe too much baggage.
#17
Posted 05 April 2007 - 02:57 PM
The TCA was an MGM/UA film so it seems odd that he wasn't on the list...
Yes, he was in TCA - and was already headlining movies.
Am I the only one that has seen the Life Magazine article from 68 with the candidates for OHMSS?
None of them had "starred" in any films as the lead.
2 had no tv/movie/stage credits at all.
McQueen's salary for films at the time probably would have taken most of OHMSS's budget.
#18
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:06 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
#19
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:22 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
Thanks for the correction. Either way it's just as amusing--a couple of swaggering shorties fighting for an inch or two. Coburn towered over both--and did go on to star in a certain American Bond film.
#20
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:24 PM
#21
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:30 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
Second response to this one: I'll still take your word on who piled up the dirt. But here's an interesting sidebar on McQueen and Brynner. Source: DVD Verdict on The Steve McQueen Collection:
"Brynner felt--absolutely correctly--that McQueen was trying to steal scenes from him. Whenever they are paired, McQueen will do some subtle thing--twist a horse's rein, play with a button, do some such thing--to draw the viewer's eye away from Brynner. Brynner's contempt is thinly veiled...It's all a great insight into McQueen's personality. He clearly wanted to be the center of attention in every scene...even when he wasn't supposed to be. Needless to say, Brynner never worked with him again."
#22
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:31 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
If they're in a western than they had the advantage of cowboy boots! I guess that extra inch or two of hieght makes all the difference.

#23
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:34 PM
Steve McQueen: GORGEOUS, Yul Brynner: DEAD SEXY - until reading that. Seriously, you've just ruined two of my major crushesHeight would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
Second response to this one: I'll still take your word on who piled up the dirt. But here's an interesting sidebar on McQueen and Brynner. Source: DVD Verdict on The Steve McQueen Collection:
"Brynner felt--absolutely correctly--that McQueen was trying to steal scenes from him. Whenever they are paired, McQueen will do some subtle thing--twist a horse's rein, play with a button, do some such thing--to draw the viewer's eye away from Brynner. Brynner's contempt is thinly veiled...It's all a great insight into McQueen's personality. He clearly wanted to be the center of attention in every scene...even when he wasn't supposed to be. Needless to say, Brynner never worked with him again."

#24
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:36 PM
Men can be very amusing creatures, bless them.
To my surprise Tom Cruise is listed as 5'7 on IMDB...I was totally expecting anywhere from 5'10 to 6'! Maybe Scientology has some merrit afterall!

Wow, Mcqueen and Brynner remind me of Zoolander and Hansel...that's pretty funny stuff.Someone should make a comedy about competitive stars-someone not named Will Farrel.
#25
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:44 PM
#26
Posted 05 April 2007 - 04:35 PM
Am I the only one that has seen the Life Magazine article from 68 with the candidates for OHMSS?
Yes.
What information did the article give?
#27
Posted 05 April 2007 - 04:38 PM
Height would have been an issue too. Most reports put his height at 5'9", but I've seen the figure as low as 5'7". Macho stars are sensitive about their heights and not a few of them probably lie. So, bear in mind: during the filming of The Magnificent Seven, McQueen was said to go out to the set early--to add dirt to where he'd be standing. Why? So he look taller than Yul Brynner. How tall was Brynner? 5'8"!
Actually, it was Brynner who added dirt to make himself look taller than McQueen. McQueen then kicked the pile of dirt when he showed up...
Second response to this one: I'll still take your word on who piled up the dirt. But here's an interesting sidebar on McQueen and Brynner. Source: DVD Verdict on The Steve McQueen Collection:
"Brynner felt--absolutely correctly--that McQueen was trying to steal scenes from him. Whenever they are paired, McQueen will do some subtle thing--twist a horse's rein, play with a button, do some such thing--to draw the viewer's eye away from Brynner. Brynner's contempt is thinly veiled...It's all a great insight into McQueen's personality. He clearly wanted to be the center of attention in every scene...even when he wasn't supposed to be. Needless to say, Brynner never worked with him again."
That's so interesting because I thought they worked really well together on screen. I heard McQueen was a lot like that though. He supposedly turned down Butch Cassidy because he wanted his name over Paul Newman's in the credits and his contract for the Towering Inferno called for him to have the same number of lines as Newman's. They even had to alter the opening and closing credits so one name was above the other vertically but not before it horizontally. It's so weird how insecure actors were back then.
#28
Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:45 PM
Am I the only one that has seen the Life Magazine article from 68 with the candidates for OHMSS?
Yes.
What information did the article give?
The candidates were John Richardson, Hans De Vries, Robert Campbell, Anthony Rogers and George Lazenby.
Household names all, eh?
#29
Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:58 PM
Am I the only one that has seen the Life Magazine article from 68 with the candidates for OHMSS?
Yes.
What information did the article give?
The candidates were John Richardson, Hans De Vries, Robert Campbell, Anthony Rogers and George Lazenby.
Household names all, eh?
You've outdone yourself here. Thanks. The only non-Laz name I know--I think--is John Richardson.
#30
Posted 05 April 2007 - 08:28 PM
Some American names did make it into the mix over time, including Burt Reynolds, Adam West, and James Brolin, but never McQueen.
Talk about a nasty game of Russian Roulette.
Burt Reynolds, Adam West, James Brolin = all bullets to the forehead.
Steve McQueen = the only empty chamber.
I have to remember to be thankful that none of those first 3 names ever materialized as Bond.
<Thank you, thank you, thank you...>