
Moviehole previews CASINO ROYALE and likes it!
#1
Posted 17 July 2006 - 09:46 PM
http://www.moviehole...nkey_15706.html
[box]Monkey
#2
Posted 17 July 2006 - 09:51 PM

#3
Posted 17 July 2006 - 09:52 PM
there
#4
Posted 17 July 2006 - 09:53 PM

Goldeneye wasn't all that...
#5
Posted 17 July 2006 - 09:55 PM
The car chase is better than Ronin's? It has to be better than Goldeneye on that merrit alone!
Goldeneye wasn't all that...
indeed.

#6
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:02 PM
[quote name='Harmsway' post='575004' date='17 July 2006 - 22:46']
there
#7
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:09 PM
[quote name='Harmsway' post='575004' date='17 July 2006 - 22:46']
there
#8
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:10 PM
[quote name='Harmsway' post='575004' date='17 July 2006 - 22:46']
there
#9
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:22 PM
[quote name='Loomis' post='575011' date='17 July 2006 - 11:52']
[quote name='Harmsway' post='575004' date='17 July 2006 - 22:46']
there
#10
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:26 PM
I know for a fact that it has, and I know in what way. It's been vastly improved into a really great sequence.
OOOOoooooooo that is music to my ears! Remember the 2nd unit director is the guy that did Bourne Identity, which bodes very well...
#11
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:36 PM

#12
Posted 17 July 2006 - 10:43 PM
#13
Posted 18 July 2006 - 12:31 AM
Of course, he also may need time to settle into the role, as has been pointed out already.
#14
Posted 18 July 2006 - 12:44 AM
It might be interesting to point out that Craig is playing Bond at the start of his game, when he is, as a character, out of his depth in the new world he has entered. ... Craig is playing a kind of "proto-Bond", before he becomes the character "we all know and love." Maybe the footage seen so far shows Craig "acting" like a slightly confused and mildly intimidated agent. By the end, he may be "acting" like a confident secret agent. Just an idea.
Exactly. Nicely observed, Stephenson.

CRITIC: Craig's Bond seems amateurish and lost for much of the film.
BOND FAN: That's the whole flippin' point, dolt!
#15
Posted 18 July 2006 - 12:53 AM
Casino Royale will also knock the ball out of the park.
#16
Posted 18 July 2006 - 02:01 AM
I for one I'm dying to see an old fashion pedal to the metal car chase that covers a lot of ground, very quickly and feature spectacular crashes and jumps.
#17
Posted 18 July 2006 - 02:12 AM
What you've done here is frighteningly forecast how a lot of critics will react to this. Many will also say it's not the James Bond we know and love and how this is a travesty and all that.CRITIC: Craig's Bond seems amateurish and lost for much of the film.
BOND FAN: That's the whole flippin' point, dolt!
And if you had a dime for every time somebody is going to refer to this film as a "remake" of the 1967 Casino Royale you'd rival Goldfinger in the cash department. Not to mention how many headlines will read "Bond Begins."
#18
Posted 18 July 2006 - 02:26 AM
And if you had a dime for every time somebody is going to refer to this film as a "remake" of the 1967 Casino Royale you'd rival Goldfinger in the cash department. Not to mention how many headlines will read "Bond Begins."
I understang what you are saying. And if this happens then ths fault, will lay at the door of EON. For not getting the say out, that this isn't a remake or Bond Begins.
#19
Posted 18 July 2006 - 04:50 AM
Guys..I know so many of you hate Pierce, but Goldeneye knocked it out of the park. Try to remember the state of the Bond franchise in 1995 before the release of Goldeneye and the state of it after.
Let's be honest, any Bond film (presumably without Dalton) released in '95, would have "hit it out of the park." It had been six years since the last film, people were getting eager for another Bond film.
Incidentally, I don't hate Pierce, but I greatly dislike Goldeneye.
#20
Posted 18 July 2006 - 05:50 AM
#21
Posted 18 July 2006 - 07:02 AM
I understang what you are saying. And if this happens then ths fault, will lay at the door of EON. For not getting the say out, that this isn't a remake or Bond Begins.
I disagree, it's just that journalists are low and lazy. Lazy journalism have become the norm. They just print and see and hear what they want to print and see and hear.
I once got interviewed for the prime time news, for about 30mn I talked. They just kept two 12s parts, and got them together, to make me say the total contrary to my beliefs. Welcome to "journalism". They knew already what they were going to air, before they even met me.
#22
Posted 18 July 2006 - 07:10 AM
#23
Posted 18 July 2006 - 07:38 AM
This chap has been conducting an obsessive campaign against Craig and Casino Royale since day one. The fact that he has anything positive to say at all is quit simply miraculous.
He has changed his mind totally based on just seeing
#24
Posted 18 July 2006 - 08:39 AM

#25
Posted 18 July 2006 - 08:59 AM
I understang what you are saying. And if this happens then ths fault, will lay at the door of EON. For not getting the say out, that this isn't a remake or Bond Begins.
Being a reboot of the Bond franchise as "Batman Begins" was a reboot of the Batman franchise wouldn't calling it Bond Begins (despite being stupid) be sort of accurate?
#26
Posted 18 July 2006 - 10:56 AM
#27
Posted 18 July 2006 - 12:59 PM
Good luck to CR...
#28
Posted 18 July 2006 - 03:39 PM
I understang what you are saying. And if this happens then ths fault, will lay at the door of EON. For not getting the say out, that this isn't a remake or Bond Begins.
I disagree, it's just that journalists are low and lazy. Lazy journalism have become the norm. They just print and see and hear what they want to print and see and hear.
I once got interviewed for the prime time news, for about 30mn I talked. They just kept two 12s parts, and got them together, to make me say the total contrary to my beliefs. Welcome to "journalism". They knew already what they were going to air, before they even met me.
I understang what you are saying. And if this happens then ths fault, will lay at the door of EON. For not getting the say out, that this isn't a remake or Bond Begins.
I disagree, it's just that journalists are low and lazy. Lazy journalism have become the norm. They just print and see and hear what they want to print and see and hear.
I once got interviewed for the prime time news, for about 30mn I talked. They just kept two 12s parts, and got them together, to make me say the total contrary to my beliefs. Welcome to "journalism". They knew already what they were going to air, before they even met me.
This is standard procedure for most journalists.
#29
Posted 20 July 2006 - 06:44 AM
I hope they don't go the "realistic route" too heavily and retain a little "zany" fun as well.
Off the subject a bit here, but I've always thought a great Bond film idea would be to feature a rogue Q-Branch agent as the villain (or close aid). More To The Point: Imagine Bond being pursued by thugs driving cars equipped with dangerous offensive gadgets and Bond forced to elude (and out-wit) his enemies in an ordinary car.
#30
Posted 20 July 2006 - 06:26 PM