
Classic Aston Martin DB5 to return
#1
Posted 23 January 2006 - 05:31 PM
http://www.mi6.co.uk...bond21&s=bond21.
#2
Posted 23 January 2006 - 05:34 PM
MI6 can reveal that two original DB5's are being shipped to the Bahamas where location shooting with Daniel Craig is expected to commence in one month's time.
Hmmm.... one month's time? Does this mean that filming has indeed been delayed? Perhaps this explains the failure to announce Vesper, Le Chiffre, etc. (or is explained by the failure to announce Vesper, Le Chiffre, etc.).
#3
Posted 23 January 2006 - 05:44 PM
Cool. Apart from the car news:
MI6 can reveal that two original DB5's are being shipped to the Bahamas where location shooting with Daniel Craig is expected to commence in one month's time.
Hmmm.... one month's time? Does this mean that filming has indeed been delayed? Perhaps this explains the failure to announce Vesper, Le Chiffre, etc. (or is explained by the failure to announce Vesper, Le Chiffre, etc.).
I wouldn
#4
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:03 PM
I know someone's going to say it's his personal car, and it just happens to be the same one Connery drove in Goldfinger, etc. But if everything's going to be brand spanking new and modern, why pander to the past with something like this?

#5
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:05 PM
#6
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:05 PM
It's a bit odd that this all-new James Bond is driving the old DB5, isn't it? It doesn't really fit in with the 'starting over' concept they keep talking about.
Think of it like Dirk Pitt. He's an old car collector; maybe the new James is somewhat along the similar lines. I think the DB5 is a timeless sort of a car, personally.
#7
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:06 PM
Well, not so fast, tbp82. This morning an anonymous tipster sent an email to CBn (and, I presume, other Bond sites as well) with this "news." The person was very eager for CBn to post it, but he used a noreply@hotmail address, which in the past has meant trouble of the Moomoo troll variety. I don't know if the CBn Team is working to verify this, or if Mi6 has somehow verified it, but know the original source of this news is a little dubious.Can't believe that someone actually beat you to it but Mi6 has revealed that the classic Aston Martid DB5 will return as Bond's personal car in Casino Royale that is big news. Here's a link.
http://www.mi6.co.uk...bond21&s=bond21.
Besides, this just feels wrong to me. I think after DAD, the filmmakers would avoid these self-conscious "winks" to old Bond films. Using the DB5 seems to contradict all that we know about Casino Royale being a fresh start. I don't know, my gut tells me this is bogus. And if it isn't, it's a big mistake, IMO.
#8
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:08 PM
#9
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:15 PM
Well, it's interesting to see that this news might not be valid. I thought it inconsistent with EON's updating of the character to re-establish him as a contemporary figure (no tuxedo, etc.).Besides, this just feels wrong to me. I think after DAD, the filmmakers are going to avoid these "winks" to old Bond films. Using the DB5 seems to contradict all that we know about Casino Royale being a fresh start. I don't know, my gut tells this is wrong. And if it isn't, it's a big mistake, IMO.
I wouldn't be surprised if the DB5 isn't in the film and they just stick with the new DBS.
#10
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:16 PM
I'm with zencat on this. This just smells bogus.
#11
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:16 PM
The reason is that perhaps this is an indication that CR may not be a reboot.
If Bond is going to also be outfitted with the new Aston Martin DBS as well, perhaps there will be scenes both in the present and past, when Bond gets the new car. Q nor Moneypenny need not be in the film for that to happen, and Judi Dench as M need only appear in the scenes set in the present.
Aside from the slight problem with maybe negating the scene where Bond gets Q Branch's Aston for the first time in Goldfinger, which can also be explained away with the Aston Martin in the film really being his personal car and not courtesy of MI6, CR can then be put into regular continuity.
I really really hope that is the case. Then I will be able to get behind this film 100 percent.
Bill
#12
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:19 PM
#13
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:31 PM
Well, not so fast, tbp82. This morning an anonymous tipster sent an email to CBn (and, I presume, other Bond sites as well) with this "news." The person was very eager for CBn to post it, but he used a noreply@hotmail address, which in the past has meant trouble of the Moomoo troll variety. I don't know if the CBn Team is working to verify this, or if Mi6 has somehow verified it, but know the original source of this news is a little dubious.Can't believe that someone actually beat you to it but Mi6 has revealed that the classic Aston Martid DB5 will return as Bond's personal car in Casino Royale that is big news.
Besides, this just feels wrong to me. I think after DAD, the filmmakers would avoid these self-conscious "winks" to old Bond films. Using the DB5 seems to contradict all that we know about Casino Royale being a fresh start. I don't know, my gut tells me this is bogus. And if it isn't, it's a big mistake, IMO.
If there's any truth to this, maybe the DB5 will be driven by Vesper or the villain or will make some cameo appearance of some kind. But I just can't reconcile the idea that Eon will keep Craig out of a tuxedo, yet put him behind the wheel of a DB5. Besides, we know Bond takes a train to the casino in Montenegro so he doesn't appear to have car in this part of the film. This means he'll drive both the DB5 and the DBS in The Bahamas? Seems weird.
#14
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:33 PM
It's not going to be a problem anyway everyone knows the DB5 as Bond's car, the classic. Good that it's making an appearance.
#15
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:39 PM
If there's any truth to this, maybe the DB5 will be driven by Vesper or the villain or will make some cameo appearance of some kind.
And then Bond will say to himself: "Ooh, nice car. I think I'll adopt it as my own personal trademark car."
Well, we were told that CASINO ROYALE would "explain" how Bond came by his famous Aston Martin (forget who told us - must have been Campbell, Haggis, Purvis, Wade or someone).
But I just can't reconcile the idea that Eon will keep Craig out of a tuxedo, yet put him behind the wheel of a DB5.
Hang on, since when has it been confirmed that Craig will be kept out of a tuxedo? Personally, I think Craig was just kidding. Don't really care either way, but I don't see any official or even reliable news that there won't be a tux on Bond in CR.
I'm really beginning to wonder why there have been no casting announcements, though.

#16
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:43 PM
It's just a film, it's artwork, it's a modern translation of Bond's beginning in the double o section. I am always amazed how many people just don't get that and take it sooo seriousely.
#17
Posted 23 January 2006 - 06:46 PM

#18
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:01 PM
Oh, yeah... I took that to mean the new Aston, but I guess it could mean the DB5. I don't know. This idea throws me worse than Judi Dench. Had we not seen the DB5 in the Brosnan films (and all the video games), maybe this idea would feel fresh, but now it just feels labored. But I guess it's all in how it's handled.Well, we were told that CASINO ROYALE would "explain" how Bond came by his famous Aston Martin (forget who told us - must have been Campbell, Haggis, Purvis, Wade or someone).
I'm not even crazy about the DBS, so maybe I just don't like the idea of there being any Aston Martin in Casino Royale. I wanted them to go all the way and clean the slate completely. Put him in something...I don't know, different. Next we'll hear Casino Royale will have a jetpack.

#19
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:09 PM
Next we'll hear Casino Royale will have a jetpack.
OK...That made me nearly spit out my coffee.

Also, I took Campbell's comment to mean how Bond came to appreciate AM. Clearly they're puting the AM in place of the Bentley. So, the notion of Bond having an old DB5 as opposed to a '33 Bentley, might work.
I still don't buy it and havent heard any mention from any of the AM people I know....and I know quite a few.
Still, my gut tells me this is just a rumor.
#20
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:12 PM
And on the tuxedo change, my gut told me that this is the push in the direction of the bourne identity, where bourne just wears normal clothes as a spy. For some reason, I think they are using bourne as a model in some areas to modernize bond. Anything to this?
#21
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:16 PM
Oh, yeah... I took that to mean the new Aston, but I guess it could mean the DB5. I don't know. This idea throws me worse than Judi Dench. Had we not seen the DB5 in the Brosnan films, maybe this idea would feel fresh, but now it just feels labored. But I guess it's all in how it's handled.Well, we were told that CASINO ROYALE would "explain" how Bond came by his famous Aston Martin (forget who told us - must have been Campbell, Haggis, Purvis, Wade or someone).
I'm not even crazy about the DBS, so maybe I just don't like the idea of there being any Aston Martin in Casino Royale. I wanted them to go all the way and clean the slate completely. Put him in something...I don't know, different. Next we'll hear Casino Royale will have a jetpack.
Here's where i'm puzzled--they have never said they are going to wipe the slate clean. Change things up--yes BUT not wipe everything out and start over. IN FACT they specifically told us they are going to show us how Bond becomes the Bond we all know. Therefore they will of course show us a number of the traditional things and how they got their start. Yes?
#22
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:22 PM
This morning an anonymous tipster sent an email to CBn (and, I presume, other Bond sites as well) with this "news." The person was very eager for CBn to post it, but he used a noreply@hotmail address, which in the past has meant trouble of the Moomoo troll variety. I don't know if the CBn Team is working to verify this, or if Mi6 has somehow verified it, but know the original source of this news is a little dubious.
Can't yet establish whether this is true or not. It might be. Equally might not be. One swallow, etc.
#23
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:42 PM
Here's where i'm puzzled--they have never said they are going to wipe the slate clean. Change things up--yes BUT not wipe everything out and start over. IN FACT they specifically told us they are going to show us how Bond becomes the Bond we all know. Therefore they will of course show us a number of the traditional things and how they got their start. Yes?
But that is starting over, isn't it?

Besides, we already know how and where he got the DB5. Q gave it to him in Goldfinger. It's there on the screen. If this is now supposed to be a new, modern, updated, yet separate version of James Bond, to the one we've seen before, then why even bother trying to make such a blatant link to the past?
Talk about not having the courage of your convictions, if this turns out to be true.
#24
Posted 23 January 2006 - 07:47 PM
#25
Posted 23 January 2006 - 08:07 PM
If it's going to be a new take on James Bond, then it would be much better, IMO, if they just went with it, and did it properly. Rather than go with some half-hearted attempt that trades off past glories, while at the same time pretending that it's something new and different.
Edited by Royal Dalton, 23 January 2006 - 09:57 PM.
#26
Posted 23 January 2006 - 08:34 PM
Anyway, I won't get too bent out of shape about this until we get some real confirmation. And even then, who knows? Remember, the DB5 was also in The World Is Not Enough...until it wasn't.
#27
Posted 23 January 2006 - 08:43 PM
#28
Posted 23 January 2006 - 09:00 PM
#29
Posted 23 January 2006 - 09:20 PM

#30
Posted 23 January 2006 - 09:28 PM
Well, not so fast, tbp82. This morning an anonymous tipster sent an email to CBn (and, I presume, other Bond sites as well) with this "news." The person was very eager for CBn to post it, but he used a noreply@hotmail address, which in the past has meant trouble of the Moomoo troll variety. I don't know if the CBn Team is working to verify this, or if Mi6 has somehow verified it, but know the original source of this news is a little dubious.Can't believe that someone actually beat you to it but Mi6 has revealed that the classic Aston Martid DB5 will return as Bond's personal car in Casino Royale that is big news. Here's a link.
http://www.mi6.co.uk...bond21&s=bond21.
Besides, this just feels wrong to me. I think after DAD, the filmmakers would avoid these self-conscious "winks" to old Bond films. Using the DB5 seems to contradict all that we know about Casino Royale being a fresh start. I don't know, my gut tells me this is bogus. And if it isn't, it's a big mistake, IMO.
It's a reboot, "Bond Begins", or whatever the hell you want to call it, but they still have to keep or add some of the things that makes Bond, Bond. As stated, Bond is forever linked to this car in the same way that Bond is linked to vodka martinis and introducing himself as Bond, James Bond. To take it away, even for a reboot or whatever would just be a sin. IMHO. It also helps usher in a new Bond and don't tell me that whenever you see Bond behind the wheel it doesn't bring a small smile to your face. They don't have to explain why it's there or how he got it. Nobody really knows what the hell this film really is anyway. You called a "fresh start", I've also heard reboot, "Bond Begins", and -to joke- the end of the franchise. So..
Frankly, I don't care. I hate origin stories, especially after the fact, so I welcome it.