How would you like to see Daniel Craig dressed along the movie, and items you would like him to wear too.
my picks:







Posted 13 January 2006 - 12:29 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 12:34 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 12:39 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 02:10 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 02:15 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 02:37 AM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 10:28 PM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 11:22 PM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 11:33 PM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 11:39 PM
Posted 13 January 2006 - 11:48 PM
Posted 14 January 2006 - 12:08 AM
Kilgour is cutting edge: retro is where it's at. That shot of Craig is from October 2004. He wasn't close to being Bond then - he was Daniel Craig, cool and edgy rising British actor. I like Boateng a lot - don't know Ikepod. But what looks like it could pass for classic now might not last. Boateng was edgy in 1999 (which is when Bullion wore him) - that look is already dating.
Why not, for this one film, because of what it is, just go back to the brands that Fleming used and are still around - and use them? Bond's tailor was never mentioned, but it was Savile Row. A Kilgour suit now and a Kilgour suit then aren't the same thing - but they're in the same area. The one from now is cutting edge and classic.
Just Googled Ikepod. Cool watches - but not for James Bond in CASINO ROYALE, for heaven's sake!
Posted 14 January 2006 - 12:22 AM
Posted 14 January 2006 - 01:21 AM
Posted 14 January 2006 - 01:59 AM
Posted 15 January 2006 - 04:18 AM
Posted 15 January 2006 - 07:01 PM
Why not, for this one film, because of what it is, just go back to the brands that Fleming used and are still around - and use them?
Posted 15 January 2006 - 07:32 PM
Posted 15 January 2006 - 09:53 PM
I said the brands, Mark, not the model! He could drive a Bentley now. The firm still exists and is known for classy cars, presumably? I don't drive, though, so I wouldn't know. I suggested a vintage Rolex, but I wasn't suggesting a Savile Row suit made in 1951!
Posted 16 January 2006 - 10:28 PM
You can't buy class
You can't buy style
Bond should always be timelessly elegant with subtle modernity.
Ozwald Boateng and the like are so wrong for Bond. So wrong.
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:12 AM
Well Bond didn't drive a 1987 Bentley in the 1953 novel, you know- totally different model! That is the brand and with the only model they produced in that year. He drove a 1933 (or was it 1930?... Hmm, can't remember) Bentley, which was roughly twenty years old when he went to the Casino Royale in 1953; hence for 2006, to stay close to Fleming's original, he should drive a knackered twenty year old, mid 1980's Bentley as that told us a lot about Bond's devil-may-care attitude and his financial assets (or lack of: Handily that old Bentley mirrors the 50's Bond's old Bentley in that it is only worth around six grand now). And that's a piccy of it, I'm afraid!
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:41 AM
Hmm, slightly pedantic Mark?
Bentley weren't inhabiting the same market during the 80s that they were during the 30s so, although your argument is valid, it's slightly off-balance.
Posted 18 January 2006 - 02:37 PM
Posted 19 January 2006 - 05:06 AM
Posted 23 September 2008 - 10:23 PM
Posted 23 September 2008 - 10:46 PM
How would you like to see him dressed?
Posted 23 September 2008 - 11:10 PM
How would you like to see him dressed?
mmmh... Does he really have to be dressed?