
Sienna Miller snubs Bond role
#1
Posted 23 December 2005 - 06:13 PM
MILLER SNUBS BOND ROLE
Model/actress SIENNA MILLER has laughed off reports she will become the next JAMES BOND girl, claiming a role alongside 007 would ruin her burgeoning career.
The majority of Bond girls, including BARBARA BACH, IZABELLA SCORUPCO, MARYAM D'ABO and CAREY LOWELL, have failed to capitalise on the international exposure following their high-profile appearances.
After Miller's LAYER CAKE co-star and alleged ex-lover DANIEL CRAIG was chosen to replace PIERCE BROSNAN as Bond in October (05), the British press were quick to tout the blonde beauty as a perfect companion for 007.
However, Miller says, "I don't think it's the right time for me to be a Bond girl. It may undo all the hard work I have been doing this year."
#2
Posted 23 December 2005 - 06:52 PM
#3
Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:05 PM
#4
Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:13 PM
#5
Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:15 PM

#7
Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:55 PM
Not only does she have LAYER CAKE and ALFIE to her name but she's also the female lead in CASANOVA, the trailer for which seems to be playing before every movie I see these days.
She will also be playing the title role in CAMILLE .
#8
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:11 PM
A handful of mediocre movies is a "good career?" Her career isn't good enough to make her think she is too good for a James Bond film.Thats hardly fair....Miller does have quite a good career.
Not only does she have LAYER CAKE and ALFIE to her name but she's also the female lead in CASANOVA, the trailer for which seems to be playing before every movie I see these days.
She will also be playing the title role in CAMILLE .
#9
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:16 PM
Not only does she have LAYER CAKE and ALFIE
#10
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:52 PM
Edited by Lappaman, 23 December 2005 - 08:52 PM.
#11
Posted 23 December 2005 - 10:45 PM
#12
Posted 23 December 2005 - 10:48 PM
Oh well.
#13
Posted 24 December 2005 - 02:55 AM
I understand people being protective of Bond-dom, but I can't imagine Ms. Miller would be deliberately dissing Bond.
#14
Posted 24 December 2005 - 02:57 AM
I find it quite unfair to condemn someone for things they may not even have said. So many, many of these "articles" misquote, take quotes out of context, or just plain make stuff up. As such, it seems quite harsh to judge someone based on reportage of this ilk.
Contact Music is by far the biggest offender of doing this.
#15
Posted 24 December 2005 - 08:49 AM
Must be PR bull.
#16
Posted 24 December 2005 - 12:32 PM
Basically, no one knows anything really and someone in a newspaper office has to sit down, pick on an actress and make up a story from a "person associated with the production" saying that the actress is under consideration.
And, given the Daniel Craig/Sienna Miller "rumours" in the real world, of course she wouldn't consider the role, any more than the producers would choose her!!
Is it just me or doesn't Vesper need to be a little older than early 20s, if Craig is 37?
Cue the Nicole Kidman stories

Edited by Gabriel, 24 December 2005 - 12:33 PM.
#17
Posted 24 December 2005 - 06:23 PM
#18
Posted 24 December 2005 - 09:13 PM
I've never seen a Sienna Miller film so I can't comment on her acting ability. However, this annoying, constantly re-appearing fiasco with Jude Law doesn't exactly make her appeal to me much.
It's not really fair to blame Miss Miller. She's really quite young - early 20s - she'd been engaged to a Hollywood star, with a rotten history including dumping Sadie Frost, the mother of his children.
Later on, Sienna and Mr Law split up, she had a brief fling with Daniel Craig in the interim (allegedly) then got back together with Law who discovers her brief fling and very publicly dumps her.
When I was in my early 20s, I was astonishingly naive and did all sorts of dreadful things . . . things that at the time didn't seem so bad.
It's not fair to condemn Sienna Miller any more than any of the other characters in the unfortunate soap opera the tabloids have created.
#19
Posted 24 December 2005 - 09:30 PM

#20
Posted 24 December 2005 - 09:48 PM

#22
Posted 25 December 2005 - 02:44 AM
Miller=

#23
Posted 25 December 2005 - 03:47 AM
Ruin what career? The eye candy of a drugdealer in a crime indpendent film, a role in the crappy and unnecessary remake of a great film and not much else. I doubt she was offered let alone considered for Vesper, plus she's blonde and I doubt they cast Vesper as a blonde.
Miller=
Which one of those movies you quoted is CASANOVA which is certainly being plugged as a blockbuster.
#24
Posted 25 December 2005 - 04:07 AM
Ruin what career? The eye candy of a drugdealer in a crime indpendent film, a role in the crappy and unnecessary remake of a great film and not much else. I doubt she was offered let alone considered for Vesper, plus she's blonde and I doubt they cast Vesper as a blonde.
Miller=
Which one of those movies you quoted is CASANOVA which is certainly being plugged as a blockbuster.
Casanova hasnt come out yet so I cant judge it on commercial terms or whether or not I thought it was any good, so I didnt comment on it. Still, she's not Streep or anybody to have movies be "beneath her".
#25
Posted 25 December 2005 - 09:52 AM
Ruin what career? The eye candy of a drugdealer in a crime indpendent film, a role in the crappy and unnecessary remake of a great film and not much else. I doubt she was offered let alone considered for Vesper, plus she's blonde and I doubt they cast Vesper as a blonde.
Miller=
Which one of those movies you quoted is CASANOVA which is certainly being plugged as a blockbuster.
Casanova hasnt come out yet so I cant judge it on commercial terms or whether or not I thought it was any good, so I didnt comment on it. Still, she's not Streep or anybody to have movies be "beneath her".
I would agree wholeheartedly with these last comments. I also highly doubt Miller was even offered the Vesper role. I could understand the reasoning behind Jolie getting it, but not Miller or Simpson.
#26
Posted 26 December 2005 - 01:23 AM
I find the fact that the directing gig was first offered to Mathew Vaughn ( Layer Cake) and the Bond role offered to Daniel Craig ( Layer Cake) adds credibility to the fact that the role of Vesper was offered to Sienna ( Layer Cake).
I think she may have turned it down for the wrong reasons and not to have bothered reading the script.
The fact that Eon appears to be going after some top named actresses suggests they think they have a strong well written role in Vesper. The fact that these actresses are saying no is a good sign. Powerful Hollywood actresses demanding changes to flex muscle verses Eon refusing to budge on what they clearly perceive is a good script can only be good for the final film. If, of course Eon wins.
Lets hope Eon do and we get the right actress for the role no matter what her current status.
#27
Posted 26 December 2005 - 02:08 AM
#28
Posted 26 December 2005 - 03:43 AM
Anything's possible
#29
Posted 26 December 2005 - 05:04 AM
Maybe she just doesn't like the script or even dare I say....Daniel Craig?
Anything's possible
Considering she had no problem jumping into bed with him, I don't think that's the problen. No, she has a movie coming out, so her publicist has chosen to link her with the Bond role, that's all there is to this.
#30
Posted 26 December 2005 - 05:23 AM
"The bitch is dead."
Monica is a better choice.
Her loss.