
How Tall is Daniel Craig?
#1
Posted 13 November 2005 - 02:47 PM
Real good movie, liked it a lot. Craig was very good in the film. But (you knew that was coming), I kept noticing how short Daniel Craig was. He was shorter than almost ever other actor in the film and barely taller than miss Miller the leading lady. In the scene where he is in the night club you can't help but notice that most everyone else is taller than him.
Shooting him from below helped in a lot of scenes, but where he appeared with other actors or in groups, his short stature is very apparent. He must be four or five inches short of six foot. Yes I know they worked around Allen Ladd, Tom Cruise and Sly Stallon height challenge, but why hire a blond ,short guy for a tall ,dark and handsome character? (notice I held back on Craig's attractiveness or lack of)
If they darken his hair, give him lifts, put everyone else in holes; he maybe be able to pull it off. Craig is a pretty good actor. Layer Cake didn't convince me he is Bondian, but he's all we got at this point right?
Love the little guy or hate him, he is the new Bond.
#2
Posted 13 November 2005 - 02:55 PM
Personally, I think he looks both shorter and older, but, hey, no complaints on the Craig front from me.

#3
Posted 13 November 2005 - 03:08 PM
#4
Posted 13 November 2005 - 03:43 PM
#5
Posted 13 November 2005 - 04:10 PM
Then again, Spotlight also lists Timothy Dalton's height as 6'0", and I'm sure he's at least a couple of inches taller than that.
#6
Posted 13 November 2005 - 04:34 PM
#7
Posted 13 November 2005 - 04:36 PM

#8
Posted 13 November 2005 - 04:45 PM

#9
Posted 13 November 2005 - 08:15 PM
#10
Posted 13 November 2005 - 09:25 PM
I wouldn't put too much stock into the Brosnan/Craig GQ pic either since Brosnan looks like he's about to fall over and Craig looks like he's leaning back.
#11
Posted 14 November 2005 - 02:50 AM
Doesn't look that short to me. Maybe an inch - inch and half less than Brosnan. Overall I'd say he's 6ft even.
I wouldn't put too much stock into the Brosnan/Craig GQ pic either since Brosnan looks like he's about to fall over and Craig looks like he's leaning back.
Agreed.
#12
Posted 14 November 2005 - 06:14 AM
#13
Posted 14 November 2005 - 06:18 AM
#14
Posted 14 November 2005 - 08:41 PM
Eon and Sony claiming he is 6-0 or 6-1 even that he is as tall as Connery is ridiculous.
Now as for Pierce I don't know if he really is 6-0 1/2 but this site below says he is, compare that image of him and Craig and Craig looks about 2 inches shorter, putting him around 5-10 1/2
http://www.freewebs....mesbondheights/
Now, maybe Craig is 6-0 if Pierce is 6-2, but he isn't. Eon claimed he was, so did MGM, but when they were asked specifically by the London Times they told them Pierce was 6 feet evevn in truth, they added 2 inches to make him seem bigger.
In other words Craig is around 5-10 most likely.
#15
Posted 15 November 2005 - 01:59 AM
1) Craig's co-star in Sylvia, Gwyneth Paltrow, reckons that at 5'10 she is taller than him.
2) At the BAFTAs this year Craig was noticeably shorter than Brosnan and Clive Owen.
3) A Sunday Telegraph reporter was surprised at his height and estimated it be no more than 5'9".
4) Craig has been a regular on British screens for some time, so there is a wealth of screen evidence to judge from. Take your pick - Craig's fight with Sean Bean in Sharpe looked like man versus mouse; he looked the same height as Paul Newman in Road To Perdition, who is 5'9", and so on.
5) A few weeks back, on his radio show, Jonathan Ross described him as a short, wiry guy. He should know, he's interviewed him enough times.
With all due respect to JameswpBond, Craig is nowhere near as tall as Rhys Ifans. This is very apparent in the film Enduring Love, in which they both starred. Craig looks only a bit shorter in the photo because he is standing significantly closer to the camera.
My best guess at Craig's height is 5'9", certainly no more than 5'10". However, this just isn't important. Craig looked plenty tall enough at the London conference, and I'm sure will appear tall enough in the actual film as well as future Bond interviews. Just don't look too closely at his footwear!
Edited by Bond Bombshell, 15 November 2005 - 02:30 AM.
#16
Posted 15 November 2005 - 03:20 AM


Besides, MI5 does not even hire men over 6'...

#17
Posted 15 November 2005 - 08:49 AM
So,brosnan was never taller than bean in GEYE,so ireckon he is around 5"11" or max 6"
#18
Posted 16 November 2005 - 12:54 AM
Edited by Con Laz Rog Tim Bros Dan 007, 16 November 2005 - 12:54 AM.
#19
Posted 16 November 2005 - 06:06 AM
#20
Posted 18 November 2005 - 01:34 AM
#22
Posted 20 November 2005 - 10:20 PM
He isn't REALLY 6-2.
Just because he says he is means jack.
It's well known he's really around 6 feet.
90 percent of actors fudge their heights.
#23
Posted 20 November 2005 - 11:28 PM
The odd photo get's bandied about saying he is shorter....but these few photographs always hide the feet. Even cameras can lie, and even Tom Cruise (5'7") can be made to look dominating onscreen, so none of this matters, Craig is fairly tall for an actor, the majority of actors are pretty short, and if they want to make an actor look taller etc on a film they do it...it's what they do in films.
Edited by Leon, 20 November 2005 - 11:31 PM.
#24
Posted 21 November 2005 - 01:40 AM
Craig is no less than 5'11 but from looking at various pictures and seeing him against people like Colm Meaney in Layer Cake (who is 5'11) he looks a fraction more.
The odd photo get's bandied about saying he is shorter....but these few photographs always hide the feet. Even cameras can lie, and even Tom Cruise (5'7") can be made to look dominating onscreen, so none of this matters, Craig is fairly tall for an actor, the majority of actors are pretty short, and if they want to make an actor look taller etc on a film they do it...it's what they do in films.
To make matters worse, in that picture the Craig is more close to the camera (playing with perspective) and Paltrow is tilting back. Paltrow is 5ft 7-8


Steven Spielberg is 5'7-8, notice the heels on Paltrow only less than an inch of difference
Jude Law EXPLICITLY stated he is 5'9 (Allure Magazine) and he likes to wear 2 inch lifts. Check out this image of Law next to Paltrow. Keep in mind she is wearing heels too and he is balding (so hair doesn't give him much height).

Again, check out 5'10 Damon, notice Paltrow's heels, at least a good inch or two.
Paltrow is in the range of 5'8-9. I say Craig is 5'9 but I am being generous by saying he is 5'10 at most.
Edited by Stratus, 21 November 2005 - 01:43 AM.
#25
Posted 21 November 2005 - 03:03 AM
I was and still am very much against Ewan McGregor being James Bond. But still, if EON are going to say that McGregor is too short for Bond, then how can they be so hypocritical as to hire someone who is barely any taller than McGregor


#26
Posted 21 November 2005 - 03:17 AM
Funny thing is that EON supposedly said that Ewan McGregor was too short for Bond. And yet Daniel Craig is barely any taller than McGregor, if at all.
Oh I must've missed that press report. When did they release it?
His height isn't a big deal. If he looks small camera angles will help him, no big deal.
#27
Posted 21 November 2005 - 03:55 AM
Funny thing is that EON supposedly said that Ewan McGregor was too short for Bond. And yet Daniel Craig is barely any taller than McGregor, if at all.
Oh I must've missed that press report. When did they release it?
His height isn't a big deal. If he looks small camera angles will help him, no big deal.
Well, I said that EON SUPPOSEDLY said that about Ewan McGregor being too short. I did NOT state that it is a fact that they said it. But there have been numerous reports that EON alegedly said that McGregor was too short.
And in this case I was not criticizing Daniel Craig, I was simply pointing out EON's hypocrisy.
#28
Posted 21 November 2005 - 01:19 PM
Paltrow is listed as 5'10 here.

Colm Meaney on the right is 5'11, George Harris (the black guy on the futher right) is 6'3
We could go on like this forever.
Again, also, it doesn't matter! It' a FILM, if he needs to be made to look an inch or two taller that's no problem at all.
Edited by Leon, 21 November 2005 - 01:27 PM.
#29
Posted 21 November 2005 - 04:13 PM
Please, you don't even know if Colm Meaney is actually 5'11. Half the time in Layer Cake there is a lot of different Camera angles in it (stylistic purposes). Are you going to easily discount the pictures I posted because it does not suit your beliefs?http://www.allmoviep...ethpaltrow.html
Paltrow is listed as 5'10 here.
Colm Meaney on the right is 5'11, George Harris (the black guy on the futher right) is 6'3
We could go on like this forever.
Again, also, it doesn't matter! It' a FILM, if he needs to be made to look an inch or two taller that's no problem at all.
Snapping info off a random site that says she is 5'10 means jack squat - how about providing some level of photographic evidence like I did (i.e. head to toe). That very same site says Jude Law is 5'11 despite the fact he explicitly stated publically he is 5'9 - I guess that tells you something doesn't it? Your picture does not include Craig from head to toe in a straight stance without a camera angle (a type of problem you yourself pointed out). THEN you on to say "it's a film it doesn't matter" to quickly change the flow of conversation.
You are right, it could go on forever, only if you provide some substantial evidence to begin with to counter me. Craig is 5'9-5'10. You deal with that and admit it and I will happily move along. I never said there was anything wrong with it either.
#30
Posted 21 November 2005 - 04:19 PM

Besides, even if he met the Bond fans' regulation height, I somehow doubt that his detractors would suddenly change their minds on him.