
Did Connery rejected OHMSS beause it was personal?
#1
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:40 PM
#2
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:42 PM
Todd
#3
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:45 PM
#4
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:45 PM
#5
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:49 PM
Did Connery rejected OHMMS beause it was personal? I mean did he knew anything about the script of OHMMS. Maybe he found it too personal.
Where's the evidence for that? As I understand it, he was simply fed up with playing Bond, and felt the films were taking too long to make and taking up too much of his time, ruling him out of other roles. There are also stories of conflict between Connery and Eon. Arguably, a "personal" Bond film (with the accompanying acting challenge of going "dark" and "gritty" and "back to Fleming" and "exploring the demons within James Bond", etc. etc. etc. - the standard press conference cobblers) might have persuaded him to stay on a while longer, not helped push him away.
#6
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:58 PM
He hated James Bond.
#8
Posted 25 April 2005 - 06:49 PM
Did Connery rejected OHMMS beause it was personal? I mean did he knew anything about the script of OHMMS. Maybe he found it too personal.
Where's the evidence for that? As I understand it, he was simply fed up with playing Bond, and felt the films were taking too long to make and taking up too much of his time, ruling him out of other roles. There are also stories of conflict between Connery and Eon. Arguably, a "personal" Bond film (with the accompanying acting challenge of going "dark" and "gritty" and "back to Fleming" and "exploring the demons within James Bond", etc. etc. etc. - the standard press conference cobblers) might have persuaded him to stay on a while longer, not helped push him away.
Well at the end of YOLT we can see that OHMSS will be the next 007 film. I think before even filming YOLT they considred filming OHMSS. Things werent like today, the scripts this way or that way were related to Flemings books. Up until 1969 I think Connery should have read all the books.
I think OHMSS had the "actor is not important James Bond and his personal life is more important" feeling. Maybe Connery was afraid of that. This makes it clear that he acted in DAF as in a comdey film. I think Connery wanted a lighter film like DAF but he couldnt agree with EON.
#9
Posted 25 April 2005 - 06:50 PM
#10
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:43 PM
#11
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:50 PM

#12
Posted 25 April 2005 - 08:53 PM
Well at the end of YOLT we can see that OHMSS will be the next 007 film. I think before even filming YOLT they considred filming OHMSS. Things werent like today, the scripts this way or that way were related to Flemings books. Up until 1969 I think Connery should have read all the books.
I think OHMSS had the "actor is not important James Bond and his personal life is more important" feeling. Maybe Connery was afraid of that. This makes it clear that he acted in DAF as in a comdey film. I think Connery wanted a lighter film like DAF but he couldnt agree with EON.
[mra]Maybe. But if that was the case he probably read You Only Live Twice and saw the relationship that book had with the film (very little) and that would have stood to show that On Her Majesty’s Secret Service need not be exactly like the book. And perhaps, had Connery been it, it wouldn
#13
Posted 25 April 2005 - 09:07 PM
Exactly - Connery was irritated with the role; a combination of his experience in Japan for You Only Live Twice and the whole "Connery IS James Bond" typecasting.
Even before You Only Live Twice too, I think he was tired of some of the long shooting days for Thunderball.
#14
Posted 25 April 2005 - 10:26 PM
Everything I have read indicates he was tired of the long shooting schedules that a Bond movie required, and was also looking to break free of the threat of being typecast.
Edited by RJJB, 25 April 2005 - 10:28 PM.
#15
Posted 25 April 2005 - 10:41 PM

Todd
Actually, I am kidding
#16
Posted 26 April 2005 - 12:14 AM
Also, the press did follow him into the men's room while in Japan, and never gave him much personal space. I believe they also remarked about his casual clothes, and lack of toupee, saying Bond shouldn't dress like that. I guess I wouldn't blame him for being fed up and wanting out.
#17
Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:31 AM
I think OHMSS had the "actor is not important James Bond and his personal life is more important" feeling. Maybe Connery was afraid of that.
That sounds absurd to me -- we're talking about a guy who had just done THE HILL a couple years earlier and wound up doing MOLLY MAGUIRES around the time of OHMSS. This was a star looking to develop as an actor, not an actor falling into the star mentality trap.
But based on YOLT (on camera and off), there must have been precious little to make Connery think that another Bond flick would have some weight, a la FRWL. too damn bad, because while OHMSS is pretty good, with Connery it would have been unbelievably awesome.
#18
Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:54 AM
I don't believe that the screen play existed when Sean Connery announced that You Only Live Twice would be his last James Bond film.
Lewis Gilbert, on one of the DVDs, mentions that he persuaded Sean to reconsider his decision which leads me to believe that the announcement came long before On Her Majesty's Secret Service went into pre-production.
In addition to the constant press attention, the fear of typecasting, and boredom for the role that others have mentioned, Sean Connery felt that Cubby Broccoli & Harry Saltzman were taking advantage of him and that he should have a percentage of the profits in addition to his acting fee.
Connery told Playboy magazine in an interview in 1965 that he was "tired of flat slob producers getting rich off the backs of lean actors".
Terence Young said that Sean wanted to be a partner of Broccoli & Saltzman. I believe that when Broccoli & Saltzman refused, Connery was fed up with the James Bond series.
I believe that Sean Connery still holds a grudge against Broccoli & Saltzman, and this is the reason why he worked with Kevin McClory to create a rival James Bond film.
#19
Posted 26 April 2005 - 02:07 AM
Did Connery rejected OHMMS beause it was personal? I mean did he knew anything about the script of OHMMS. Maybe he found it too personal.
At one point OHMSS was going to follow Thunderball. I doubt it was because of the script. I think he was just wanting to get away from Bond and do something else, he wasn't really known for much else.
#20
Posted 26 April 2005 - 02:17 AM
#21
Posted 26 April 2005 - 02:24 AM
Did Connery ever actually see On Her Majesty’s Secret Service? If so, did he ever voice his opinion of Lazenby's performance as Bond and/or the film itself?
Wasn't there an article about him saying he did/didn't see this one a while back? I may be thinking of something else.
#22
Posted 26 April 2005 - 11:31 AM
#23
Posted 26 April 2005 - 12:20 PM
#24
Posted 26 April 2005 - 04:10 PM
???????? :: Raises eyebrow:: What does this have to do with anything?? That's like saying "Oh, Pierce Brosnan is Irish, so he must always come to work with a six pack of Guiness and talk to leprechauns while eating Lucky Charms with a four leaf clover in his hair." Correct me if I am mistaken please.
Todd
"Oh, Brosnan also wears green all the time"
#25
Posted 26 April 2005 - 05:24 PM
#26
Posted 26 April 2005 - 05:29 PM
Hehe. Legend!
Oh, and no I don't think the Hunt approach put Connery off. I don't think he cared what sort of film the 6th would be. He had already made his made up to leave (barring the unlikely ; he being made a partner in the series)
Edited by Scottlee, 26 April 2005 - 05:30 PM.