

Bond's Gun in Live and Let Die
#1
Posted 01 March 2005 - 07:16 AM

#2
Posted 01 March 2005 - 09:23 AM
#3
Posted 01 March 2005 - 03:02 PM
I can think of perhaps two reasons why he carried such a gun:
1. They were still trying to get away from the memory of Connery by sticking Bond with a different gun most of the time, save for the sequence where Tee Hee twists the Walther into junk, we just don't see it.
2. Since they were already sort of cashing in on blaxploitation, why not cash in on another popular character of the day - Dirty Harry.
I like the look of the gun, it suits Bond well. But it just seems unwieldy. Notice in a lot of the publicity pictures for LALD, Moore seems to be posing every type of firearm but the Walther. It's in a few, but not the majority that I've seen. I'm surprised he carried it in the gunbarrel.
#4
Posted 01 March 2005 - 03:43 PM
Edited by Trident, 01 March 2005 - 03:44 PM.
#5
Posted 01 March 2005 - 10:30 PM
With that kind of firepower, I never understood why Rog felt he had to put two more into the ceramic Baron Samedi - his first was a head shot.
Of the heavy guns Bond has used my favorite is the Ruger RedHawk kept in the Saab in Icebreaker.
#6
Posted 01 March 2005 - 10:43 PM
It's a .44 S&W model 29 (Dirty Harry) with the 6.5 barrel.
With that kind of firepower, I never understood why Rog felt he had to put two more into the ceramic Baron Samedi - his first was a head shot.
Of the heavy guns Bond has used my favorite is the Ruger RedHawk kept in the Saab in Icebreaker.
I was just thinking about Icebreaker today actually....as I nearly lost control of my car on the snowy streets. I was waiting for snow plows to try and smash me.
And yeah I didn't get why you would need to put in 2 more with ANYTHING if the head of your target just exploded. Maybe 1 to be safe...but 2...come on Roger, think.
#7
Posted 02 March 2005 - 05:08 AM
It's a .44 S&W model 29 (Dirty Harry) with the 6.5 barrel.
With that kind of firepower, I never understood why Rog felt he had to put two more into the ceramic Baron Samedi - his first was a head shot.
Well, the guy is supposed to be the Lord of the Undead or something. Beoing cautious never got anyone killed...outside of action movies when it's the guy who is three days from retirement.

#9
Posted 02 March 2005 - 05:53 AM

LALD is quite possibly the best of the Bond films that are generally considered not up to snuff. If you forget Kananga's comical death and the J.W. Pepper scenes (the latter of which is not as intrusive nor as bad as many make them out to be), it's a pretty cool Bond flick. Roger plays Bond rough yet smooth, there's an excellent score by George Martin and there are some all-time classic one-liners (the one about the short man who lost a fight with a chicken slays me every time

#10
Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:18 AM
Fleming refered to a Colt '45 in a secret compartment beneath the dashboard. I never found out, wheather he meant the '45 ACP or a '45 Colt revolver.
Casino Royale mentions his “long-barrelled Colt Army Special .45”. The actual length of barrel was not mentioned, nor was it mentioned as to whether this was a revolver or an automatic and, although make and “type” were mentioned, I could not find this model documented in my research material, although “long barrelled” usually refers to revolvers.
#11
Posted 03 March 2005 - 02:15 AM
For the longest time, I thought that the 'Colt .45' mentioned in TMWTGG and other novels was a semi-auto. Learning more about firearms and re-reading the text has caused me to conclude that Fleming was referring to a Colt .45 revolver, either a double-action New Service model or the single-action Single Action Army.
It's also kind of funny that on the LALD dvd cover, the revolver that is shown is a stainless steel Ruger Redhawk, not a Smith and Wesson nickel model 29. Funny because the Redhawk didn't debut until 1980 or so.
Agree that Moore looks devastating in all black with the shoulder rig and the 29. Very dangerous, indeed.
#12
Posted 03 March 2005 - 07:07 PM
With Scaramangas Colt I'm pretty sure it was a revolver. Bond takes a quick raid on Scaramangas hotel room while the killer is working out on the trampolin. There he finds the gun and takes the "round in the cylinder that would next come up for firing". That clearly refers to a revolver.
#13
Posted 03 March 2005 - 07:50 PM
I'd also guess that Bond's .45 was a revolver since in Dr No he gets a compact automatic (the PPK) and a revolver (S&W Centennial Airweight) to replace his old load out.
#14
Posted 03 March 2005 - 08:03 PM
A) Fleming was referring to a Colt .45 revolver, either a double-action New Service model or the single-action Single Action Army.
It's also kind of funny that on the LALD dvd cover, the revolver that is shown is a stainless steel Ruger Redhawk, not a Smith and Wesson nickel model 29. Funny because the Redhawk didn't debut until 1980 or so.
A) I don't have access to my books at the moment, but the revolver in "Golden Gun" is depicted on the cover of the Cape version, and I am pretty certain that it a single action type.

#15
Posted 04 March 2005 - 06:51 AM
He also recommended several other guns in bigger calibers for different uses. For close-up combat and concealability the Walther was one of his favourites; another one the mentioned Centennial Airweight revolver in .38 caliber.
For long-range shooting he recommended the S&W .357 magnum which could also fire the weaker .38 rounds if necessary. Fleming mixed this up and ended with giving Bond the Walther as personal handgun and the Airweight (which Boothroyd had also suggested as personal gun) for penetrating heavyer stuff or further distanced targets. Fleming was very thankfull for the help Boothroyd had provided and invented a 'Major Boothroyd' as armourer of the service. As he realised his error it was already too late for a change and Fleming and Boothroyd both took the thing in pretty good humour as they both expected gun toters all over the world to correct their false choice of revolver.
#16
Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:48 PM
#17
Posted 20 March 2005 - 11:21 PM
Edited by right idea, wrong pussy, 20 March 2005 - 11:22 PM.
#18
Posted 21 March 2005 - 12:23 AM
The gun in DAD was a blue S&W K frame with fixed sights, in either .38 Special or .357 Magnum (they are hard to tell apart) with a four inch barrel.
The LALD gun was, as noted above, a 6 or 6 1/2" barrel nickel finish M29, which is an N frame gun (larger) with adjustable sights.
#19
Posted 22 March 2005 - 06:41 AM
Yeah I think he even calls it a revolver in TMWTGG at some point. It's just logical since a revolver would be mroe accurate than an automatic of the time.
I'd also guess that Bond's .45 was a revolver since in Dr No he gets a compact automatic (the PPK) and a revolver (S&W Centennial Airweight) to replace his old load out.
The Golden Gun is a revolver. Bond removes a bullet from the next chamber as a possible "edge" against Scaramanga.
#20
Posted 22 March 2005 - 06:55 AM
Edited by 00Twelve, 22 March 2005 - 06:56 AM.
#21
Posted 22 March 2005 - 07:11 AM
I'm thinking about it.
Never know when I'm going to have to rescue someone from the un-dead.
The great thing about the .44 in Dirty Harry's hands was that it was a one shot-one kill revolver but with enough control that Harry could actually wing someone.
From the original:
Scorpio Killer: (having just been grazed by Harry in the middle of a stadium)
"You tried to kill me!"
Harry: "If I had tried to kill you your brains would be all over the field. Where's the girl?!"

Wouldn't mind seeing Bond with one again though.
#22
Posted 22 March 2005 - 08:28 AM

#24
Posted 22 March 2005 - 10:16 PM
#25
Posted 22 March 2005 - 10:24 PM
...but were you really expecting anything less?
I do have a reputation to maintain....What exactly that is, I'm not sure...
*shrugs*
eh...What're you gonna do?

Good little gun the 1910. I still prefer the 1935 Hi-Power though.
#26
Posted 01 April 2005 - 08:52 AM
Stuart is correct in that Scaramanga's .45 seems to be (per the book) a .45 revolver. I believe it is a single action army as a .45 double action wasn't produces until later and I assume Bond had had is for some time.
Trident is right--those clips were nicknamed "half-moon" clips. as you used two, not one with which to reload. Also, besides the reference you mentioned, Bond also shoots Scaramanga's gun at the party and pulls back the hammer to inspect the cylinder.
I think we might be confused about this because, although appropriate for a showy pistolero such as Scaramanga, such a gun has limited practical use, (IMHO). perfect for target shooting, but lacking in power. I've never shot one, I'm going on what I've read or heard from others.
Check out the following link and take a look at the Cove cover: http://www.shatterha...OVELTMWTGG.html
The picture above is on the cover of my Signet p/b version. It shows Scaramanga with a .45 auto.
Regarding Bond's .45:
The confusion lies between the name of the cartridge .45 Long Colt (for the revolver) and the .45 ACP (for the semi-auto). Both have relatively long barrels. Flemming, not the gun expert himself, could have thought that a 5" Colt 1911 was long, (I do). The .45 revolver with a 6" barrel is long too. It also fires the "Long Colt" .45 round. I would think that since Flemming called both Scaramanga's gun and Bonds a long Colt and since Scaramanga's is doubtless a .45 revolver commonly used for shows, etc. Bond's would be too.
Here's where I interject with my own opinion:
The .45 Long Colt is nearly defunct now and was becoming so then. It was used and still is for Cowboy action shooting or for "Annie Oakley" type shows--hence Scaramanga's expertise with them.
For Bond, though, who fought in WW2, which was liberated in part by the American GI with his Colt .45 semi-auto, I would think he had a 5" barreled semi-auto pistol, not a revolver. He would have had access to it and may have even used one during the war, hardly the case with the revolver. the .45 auto is still today, one of the most effective sidearms made, hardly the case for the revolver. Combat troops and officers swear and swore then too, by the .45 auto, not the revolver. Flemming, I say, would probably have gained a relatively high opinion of this weapon as opposed to the revolver.
Let Scaramanga have his cowboy gun, but give Bond a .45 auto.
One final note: Trident, the .22 has marginally equal stopping power when compared to the .25. All factory info given about the .22 is measured from a rifle. Most handgun tests I have reviewed for the .22 in a pistol have been fired from a 5.5" barreled handgun, usually a Ruger. The most reputable .22lr test I have reviewed stated emphatically that .22 and .25 inflict the same wound trama. The problem with the .22 in a pocket gun is reliability--very picky about ammo it will function with, must keep it absolutely spotless so fouling doesn't cause misfires. .22 ammo is dirty. The .22 bullet tumbles and often exits wound channels early, causing a small permanent wound cavity. The .22 wasn't made originally to be magazine-fed and is not as reliable in small automatic pistols for that reason. What really surprises me about Boothroyd's usually infallible opinion is that .22 ammo was crappy back in the day when compared to .25. FMJ vs lead would make little difference except that lead would flatten out more readily than FMJ and thus penetrate less, decreasing the effectiveness of the bullet.
#27
Posted 02 April 2005 - 02:35 PM
To tell the truth I only remember the story from the german edition of "For Bond Lovers Only". I've read the book some twenty years ago but unfortunately I've lost it somewhere between here and five or six different cities I've lived in since

Edited by Trident, 02 April 2005 - 02:37 PM.
#28
Posted 02 April 2005 - 03:09 PM
A .22 revolver makes sense-no stoppage problems, no spent casings to pick up. Just ask Bobby Kennedy. The problem with a revolver from Flemming/Bond's standpoint is that it is impossible to satisfactorily silence it. Thus the need for an automatic. The Sauer was a well-made piece. The Tokarev was very popular in eastern block countries but was rather large. The PPK would be a no-brainer when compared to the others he mentioned.
#29
Posted 02 April 2005 - 06:44 PM
In their letters they skipped several topics related to guns such as the weapons of the Resistance and other groups fighting the nazis in WWII. Fleming was very impressed by some of the disguised trick-weapons and I believe Red Grants shooting book was another result of the exchange between Fleming and Boothroyd.
#30
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:41 AM