

Which Film Best Portayed Ian Fleming's Bond?
#1
Posted 17 January 2005 - 10:34 PM

#2
Posted 17 January 2005 - 10:44 PM
#4
Posted 17 January 2005 - 11:20 PM
#5
Posted 17 January 2005 - 11:24 PM
#6
Posted 17 January 2005 - 11:24 PM
#7
Posted 17 January 2005 - 11:38 PM
#8
Posted 17 January 2005 - 11:39 PM
#9
Posted 18 January 2005 - 12:58 AM
#10
Posted 18 January 2005 - 12:59 AM
#12
Posted 18 January 2005 - 01:56 AM
A fairly faithful adaptation of the novel, a great portrayal that set the tone for Bonds to come and one can't forget to mention the time period as well. Sean showed off Bond as a cool, calculating killer who can love women and use them at the same time.
FRWL is a close second and I am a bit inclined to say TLD, just because I love it so much.
#13
Posted 18 January 2005 - 01:03 PM
#14
Posted 18 January 2005 - 01:06 PM
#15
Posted 18 January 2005 - 01:14 PM
#16
Posted 18 January 2005 - 01:31 PM
I was surprised nobody else mentioned this. The Dr. No Bond certainly seems like the cold, crueler Bond of the early novels, but this captures the later novels mode even more.Might On Her Majesty’s Secret Service deserve an honorable mention?
#17
Posted 18 January 2005 - 03:02 PM
Dr. No was quite there as well. But Connery's portrayal includes a certain animal element that was not in the books that I read. Ironically, it is precisely this element which was largely responsible for his appeal.
TLD was rather there as well. But Dalton's portrayal imparted an internal unrest that far exceeded the literary Bond's.
Edited by Bon-san, 18 January 2005 - 03:04 PM.
#18
Posted 18 January 2005 - 03:06 PM
#19
Posted 18 January 2005 - 03:19 PM
My subjective response is OHMSS. The movie itself was as faithful an adaption as we've seen. And what I find wonderful about Lazenby's performance is that he had an inherent cockiness, which was tempered by a measure of caution and reserve that went along with undertaking this momumental part in his first acting role. The result, to this viewer, was a portrait that captured better than any other, the dimension of Bond as written by Fleming, i.e., A confident man who is unnerved only slightly (but is in fact unnerved) by the extraordinary circumstances of his profession.
I'd never considered that, but you're dead on. Eloquently expressed, too. Yes, that is just why Lazenby works in the part - he's playing himself, an arrogant young model with the weight of the world's biggest role on his shoulders. And it produces the arrogant secret agent with the weight of his wife's death on his shoulders.
#20
Posted 18 January 2005 - 05:42 PM
#21
Posted 18 January 2005 - 08:10 PM
I was surprised nobody else mentioned this. The Dr. No Bond certainly seems like the cold, crueler Bond of the early novels, but this captures the later novels mode even more.Might On Her Majesty’s Secret Service deserve an honorable mention?
Indeed. Along with Dr. No, it closely follows the book, so it's "closer" than any other in that respect.
#22
Posted 18 January 2005 - 08:15 PM
#23
Posted 18 January 2005 - 08:16 PM
wow, considering how much I've been watching OHMSS lately I'm surprised I didn't think of it. It's certainly very Fleming. I think when Lazenby is sitting by the ice rink, burned out and terrified is one of the best parts of the movie. He really nails that scene.
That, with Tracy arriving as well, is the best scene in the series. IMO.
#24
Posted 18 January 2005 - 09:08 PM

#25
Posted 19 January 2005 - 05:06 AM
#26
Posted 19 January 2005 - 06:24 AM
As to the Bond film that best portrays Fleming's Bond, that's a toughie for me. None of them seem to very close, in my opinion. While Dalton may have wanted to be close, he can could only go as far as the scripts went. The dalton films didn't feel very fleming-ish to me. I still tend to lean towards Moore for the most accurate portrayle, though not at all times. Dalton would probably be a close second. Connery and Brosnan are not very close at all...they are movie Bonds (as are the others, really, not that that's a bad thing though). Even Lazenby isn't all that close, in my opinion, because he was trying so hard to be like Connery.
Off the subject again, but starting with FYEO, the series seemed to try to be like all of the other spy movies...drab-ish and supposedly more realistic.
#27
Posted 19 January 2005 - 08:19 PM
#28
Posted 19 January 2005 - 11:47 PM
Bond at his darkest and most Flemingesque, by far.
#29
Posted 20 January 2005 - 12:01 AM
#30
Posted 20 January 2005 - 12:31 AM