
roger bein blonde
#1
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:08 PM
M_T
#2
Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:16 PM
#3
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:28 PM

#4
Posted 11 September 2004 - 06:54 PM
#5
Posted 11 September 2004 - 07:09 PM
M_T
#6
Posted 11 September 2004 - 08:37 PM
Why should they have to though? It worked fine as it was.but even tho he isnt my fav bond, dont u think eon @ least could have dyed his hair for look purpouses yet alone character purpouses.
M_T
#7
Posted 11 September 2004 - 10:36 PM
Even with green/red/blue hair Roger Moore would have been the better 007!but even tho he isnt my fav bond, dont u think eon @ least could have dyed his hair for look purpouses yet alone character purpouses.
M_T

#8
Posted 11 September 2004 - 10:37 PM
Even with green/red/blue hair Roger Moore would have been the better 007!You could dye his hair purple, and it still would not change the fact he was miscast as James Bond.
Roger, miscasted, c'mon!
#9
Posted 12 September 2004 - 12:33 AM
#10
Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:13 AM
Yay!Even with green/red/blue hair Roger Moore would have been the better 007!but even tho he isnt my fav bond, dont u think eon @ least could have dyed his hair for look purpouses yet alone character purpouses.
M_T![]()

#11
Posted 12 September 2004 - 03:29 AM
Hahahaaha... No.You could dye his hair purple, and it still would not change the fact he was miscast as James Bond.
#12
Posted 12 September 2004 - 03:35 AM
I must agree. Roger was terrific as James Bond.Hahahaaha... No.You could dye his hair purple, and it still would not change the fact he was miscast as James Bond.
#13
Posted 12 September 2004 - 05:43 PM
M_T
#14
Posted 12 September 2004 - 10:00 PM
Why though? Does it really make that big a difference?all im sayin is, everybond EXCEPT moore has black hair, the least they could have done was made it black too, is the make-up department to cheap for black hair dye? like really, sure its a small matter, but come on.
M_T
#15
Posted 13 September 2004 - 02:48 AM
M_T
#16
Posted 13 September 2004 - 02:50 AM

#17
Posted 14 September 2004 - 05:16 PM
Edited by Bond_Bishop, 14 September 2004 - 05:16 PM.
#18
Posted 14 September 2004 - 06:56 PM

#19
Posted 14 September 2004 - 07:02 PM
It might have been the age showing.Roger Moore is a great actor and his haircolor is the only thing I am disturbed about in his Bond movies. It really looked blonde in AVTAK. He should have dyed it black or more darker. But he was fine anyway
#20
Posted 15 September 2004 - 04:09 AM
M_T
#21
Posted 16 September 2004 - 03:04 AM
#22
Posted 16 September 2004 - 03:07 AM
Which cover are you referring to?lmao, on the cover for octopussy, his hair is like red, lmao.
M_T
#23
Posted 17 September 2004 - 03:27 AM
Agreed, Qwerts. He is my favorite.I must agree. Roger was terrific as James Bond.
Hahahaaha... No.You could dye his hair purple, and it still would not change the fact he was miscast as James Bond.

#24
Posted 17 September 2004 - 03:30 AM

#25
Posted 17 September 2004 - 01:19 PM
M_T
#26
Posted 17 September 2004 - 07:27 PM
#27
Posted 17 September 2004 - 09:20 PM
Whoa, there. Green and blue hair? That's blasphemous, that is.Even with green/red/blue hair Roger Moore would have been the better 007!
I think we may have to draw the line somewhere, Missy.
#28
Posted 18 September 2004 - 12:02 AM
#29
Posted 18 September 2004 - 12:29 AM
Interesting point. I don't think it's a total difference from his hair when he was James Bond then, but I see your point.Roger would have looked great with black hair. It would have given him a meaner look. If you've seen the early episodes of The Saint where Roger's hair is fairly dark brown you'll know what I mean.
#30
Posted 18 September 2004 - 12:33 AM
Edited by Lady Templar, 18 September 2004 - 12:35 AM.