Fans of Hugh Jackman are looking forward to Van Helsing for two reasons - either to see their action hero strut his stuff battling the vamps and monsters, or those scenes hinted at in the trailer where he stumbles around in a loincloth and goes swinging around on ropes Tarzan style.
Well it seems fans of the latter who want more may get it. British tabloid The Daily Star was talking about Hugh Jackman being a candidate for 007 recently and mentioned the following excerpt:
"And why hasn't year old Hugh Jackman put his hand up to play deboniar James Bond, a role he seems unashedamly tailor-made for? He has his sights on a slightly more underdressed hero, Tarzan: Lord of the Jungle.
Set to be written and directed by Joel and Ethan Coen, the new Tarzan would be set in the modern day, where the former King of the Jungle moves to the City, where he appoints himelf a new savior to those in despair. A studio source say Jackman has already expressed interest in the film. "Not only is he in the right phyiscal shape for the role, but he's got the acting chops to really pull this off"
It's an interesting possibility, especially since the last person to take on the role was a fellow Aussie, the overflowing lunchbox CK model Travis Fimmel in the short lived WB series "Tarzan".

Jackman Prefers Tarzan above 007
#1
Posted 03 May 2004 - 09:42 PM
#2
Posted 03 May 2004 - 09:46 PM
hugh jackman is james bond. he was born for the role.
oh well we still have owen, as long as we dont get some punk kid
#3
Posted 03 May 2004 - 09:46 PM
I prefer Clive Owen , he has the "bond look" and intensity of the character.
#4
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:04 PM
IF I had the good fortune to be producing the James Bond series, I'd want an actor that was going to become a huge box office draw by establishing himself in big projects that were popular, rather than the sort of movies that Brosnan has been making between Bonds that attracy small audiences.
And note it says he has only "expressed interest."
Edited by Bond Bug, 03 May 2004 - 10:07 PM.
#5
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:05 PM
#6
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:12 PM
This is the message for Hugh Jackman: Please Hugh don't take Tarzan over 007, please, you are the only 1 on the list who will take over as James Bond after Pierce Brosnan and take the 007 movie to the box office.
I'll pray for you Hugh Jackman as James Bond 007.
#7
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:45 PM
#8
Civilian_007 Samurai_*
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:48 PM
#9
Posted 03 May 2004 - 10:50 PM
#10
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:06 PM
#11
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:32 PM
#12
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:36 PM
#13
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:39 PM
#14
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:42 PM
Exactly, and looking at the others, he seems to be one of the top contenders, and being interested in the other project is fine, but I wonder what he would do if he was given the offer today at this moment.No reason why he can't play Tarzan AND James Bond.
And note it says he has only "expressed interest."
#15
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:49 PM
However the odds on favourite is for a plot involving a time machine and warp drive.
#16
Posted 03 May 2004 - 11:54 PM
If that gives Owen the inside track or brings Brosnan closer to the fold, so be it.
#17
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:13 AM
#18
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:23 AM
#19
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:24 AM
#20
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:24 AM
#21
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:43 AM
#22
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:46 AM
LOL! Yes, I remember seeing something on television about that. Get a Calvin Klein underwear model and make him Tarzen...sure hit.He is not going to do a cheesy Tarzan movie at age 35! They did a series on the WB with that exact premise starring a 25-ish guy and it tanked...He will do Bond unless Owen gets the call first.
I believe that show got like 3 episodes or so, if I recall from the paper correctly.
#23
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:50 AM
Now Jackmen people say no phone call, so Pierce can be equally wrong on Owen.
Either way you wouldn't know who was Bond until it is announced.
#24
Posted 04 May 2004 - 12:51 AM

#25
Posted 04 May 2004 - 01:29 AM
#26
Posted 04 May 2004 - 01:35 AM
Clive Owen's fans read this:
OWEN SUCKS OWEN SUCKS OWEN SUCKS
Does Owen want to be 007: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
His face is too old like a 45 to 50 year old and he is a real terrible choice. Owen said he still doesn't want to play 007 ever.
As for Hugh Jackman, please don't play Tarzan ever, please I'm begging you on my knees with all the power of God Mighty that you are James Bond 007, please take the role that's what most Jackman's fans want. I wish Hugh Jackman was the next James Bond 007 right now.
#27
Posted 04 May 2004 - 01:46 AM
but..
He may end up doing both
He may end up doing neither
Also, Van Hanwhatever looks like the sort of thing that may have sequels if it's any good (or even if it isn't).
#28
Posted 04 May 2004 - 01:52 AM
So that's a "no" for Clive Owen then?You Clive Owen's fans face fact, the producers will never hire an unknown actor like Connery in a million years, Connery was the best unknown actor who played 007 ever.
Clive Owen's fans read this:
OWEN SUCKS OWEN SUCKS OWEN SUCKS
Does Owen want to be 007: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
Clive Owen: NO
His face is too old like a 45 to 50 year old and he is a real terrible choice. Owen said he still doesn't want to play 007 ever.
#29
Posted 04 May 2004 - 02:13 AM
I wish somebody else will take Tarzan rather than Hugh Jackman. Please if anyone who is Hugh Jackman's fans please convince him that he will be James Bond.
#30
Posted 04 May 2004 - 10:09 AM
It sounds like he's making some shrewd choices, going for movies that are going to be popular, rather than small artistic movies, and that will take him to the top of the A list.