
Thoughts on Octopussy.
#1
Posted 21 April 2004 - 07:31 PM
What are other fans thoughts on the film.
#2
Posted 21 April 2004 - 08:10 PM
I think your lines sum up my feelings about OP.The plot is a nice mixture of fairy tale land, what with the baddie being an evil prince and all, and cold war thriller, in effect a joining together of the more fantastical Moore elements with the return to realism in FYEO. I quite like the film and think it does come close to an all time high for Moore.
It's this balance that makes it my personal favorite Moore film and one of my favorites in the series. It's the one where everything clicks for me. I saw it four times when it came out in '83.
#3
Posted 21 April 2004 - 08:14 PM
Still, at least there was a decent Bond movie in 1983 - NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
#4
Posted 21 April 2004 - 08:19 PM
My third favorite Moore, and borderline in my overall top 5 of the series. Kamal, Gobinda, and Magda make a fantastic trio of villains, (even though Magda moves back and forth). Maud Adams clearly shines in her second performance as a Bond girl, and I think she had some of the very best chemistry with Moore, compared to the other leading ladies.
A superb plot, with a great score by Barry, sharp directing with the action and chase sequences.
Overall, a thoroughly enjoyable Bond film.
#5
Posted 21 April 2004 - 09:16 PM
Rather than enumerating the low points of the movie, I will name the stupidest scene in the movie. As Khan escapes with OP, Bond chases on horseback and grabs on to the plane as it takes off. No parachute. Sorry, but there is no way in hell that anyone in his right mind would do that. It was just plain dumb.
If that wasn't ridiculous enough, Khan then sends Gobinda out to fight with Bond.
#6
Posted 21 April 2004 - 10:44 PM
I enjoy it. It's not good, it's not bad, it's not even ugly. It's Moore Bond!
#7
Posted 22 April 2004 - 12:49 AM
Loomis, I usually share several similar viewpoints as you, but we differ greatly on this one.For me, OCTOPUSSY is one of the very worst James Bond films ever, possibly second only to THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH as the lamest flick of the entire bunch.
Still, at least there was a decent Bond movie in 1983 - NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
I'm curious as to why you dislike OP so much.

#8
Posted 22 April 2004 - 12:55 AM
I don't find this scene any worse than the precredits of GE where Bond drives off a cliff and flies into a plane. That ruined what I thought up to that point was one of the best teasers in the entire series. At least the Moore films were supposed to be a lot less than serious, unlike GE, which is supposed to be a return to a more realistic Bond.Rather than enumerating the low points of the movie, I will name the stupidest scene in the movie. As Khan escapes with OP, Bond chases on horseback and grabs on to the plane as it takes off. No parachute. Sorry, but there is no way in hell that anyone in his right mind would do that. It was just plain dumb.
If that wasn't ridiculous enough, Khan then sends Gobinda out to fight with Bond.
#9
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:09 AM
#10
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:20 AM
Goes for 10 minutes too long and has about four different endings, plus they should have made 009s death the pre-title scene (as much as I like jet one), but apart from that I won't fault it. Willing to let the silly gags slide. They threw everything into this one, probably with the intention of beating Never Say Never Again. I think they succeded.
#11
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:30 AM
I think they took the formula of For Your Eyes Only and just improved upon it by adding just a little bit more humor and not making it a total down to earth film, it's not too over the top at all, nor too down to earth, Octopussy has a fine balance of the elements. The locations and dialogue really are a lot of fun in this film.I like it despite being vastly inferior to the previous outing.
#12
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:38 AM
These are effective scenes.
#13
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:45 AM
All attributed to some wonderful ideas that I believe Glen had a strong hand in creating for the film. Quite nice, the 'never-ending' finale, such like From Russia With Love's is very well done.Remember the part where the teenagers pretended to give Bond a ride? Or when he had to wait for the lady on the phone? Or when the police thinks he's an enemy and chasing after him?
These are effective scenes.
#14
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:50 AM
#15
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:53 AM
#16
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:54 AM
Excellent points.I felt Bond was more realistic in Octopussy. He didn't feel like an invincible secret agent in the film. He seemed like a ordinary person in some scenes. Remember the part where the teenagers pretended to give Bond a ride? Or when he had to wait for the lady on the phone? Or when the police thinks he's an enemy and chasing after him?
These are effective scenes.

#17
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:57 AM
#18
Posted 22 April 2004 - 03:23 AM
Exactly, I think if one dwells on all the negatives, it just makes the film less enjoyable, and I think the positives heavily outweigh any negatives in Octopussy.I'm willing to overlook the Tarzan yells and clown and gorilla suit sillieness when you consider these scenes are in there as well. It really is a performance that requires a number of different emotions and actions for an actor when you think about it.
#19
Posted 22 April 2004 - 03:28 AM
#20
Posted 22 April 2004 - 03:57 AM
How can you say that? In my experience even the worst Octopussy was pretty damned good!I agree that Octopussy is one of the worst Bond movies...


4A
#21
Posted 22 April 2004 - 11:33 AM
The makers of OCTOPUSSY should have reached a firm decision, very early on in production, as to whether they wanted to make another MOONRAKER or another FOR YOUR EYES ONLY. The car crash that is OCTOPUSSY stands as an awful cautionary tale of what you get when you decide you want to make both MOONRAKER 2 and FOR YOUR EYES ONLY 2 at the same time.Loomis, I usually share several similar viewpoints as you, but we differ greatly on this one.For me, OCTOPUSSY is one of the very worst James Bond films ever, possibly second only to THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH as the lamest flick of the entire bunch.
Still, at least there was a decent Bond movie in 1983 - NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
I'm curious as to why you dislike OP so much.![]()
Even by Bond movie standards, OCTOPUSSY suffers from horrific lapses in logic. For instance, how would Octopussy have known that 007 was the man who caught up with her father, Dexter Smythe, and gave him "an honourable alternative"? We know she wasn't present at the time, and it seems unlikely that her old man would have phoned her up and said: "Look, love, I'm afraid I'm on the way out. You see, there's this chap James Bond, some undercover fellow who goes by the alias 007, and he's rumbled me, and...." Indeed, since she wasn't there, how would Octopussy have known about the unspoken "honourable alternative" deal at all? And, actually, since when has committing suicide rather than facing the music for what one has done been "honourable"? It's a coward's way out, no?
And while we're on the subject, what the heck gave Bond the right to offer Smythe an alternative to capture and trial? Bond's job was to take him into custody so that he could face justice, full stop - no ifs or buts, and certainly no "honourable" ways out. Did Smythe bribe 007? Did he give him some of that stolen gold in return for being given 24 hours to clean up his affairs and the opportunity to be left alone with a revolver? I think we should be told.
Also, OCTOPUSSY may be the most racially offensive of all the Bond flicks, quite an "achievement" when one considers that the series also, uh, committed LIVE AND LET DIE. India gained independence in 1947. Why is this fact seemingly lost on the characters in OCTOPUSSY, Indian and British, who behave as though the British Raj is still in full swing? Why is Vijay so bloody deferential? How does Bond get away with remarks like "That'll keep you in curry for a few weeks"? Did Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, have a hand in the screenplay, I wonder?
Still, the embarrassments of OCTOPUSSY are legion: an elderly, leering Moore tromboning the zoom lens of a video camera into a woman's cleavage (yes, folks, this is supposed to be the sophisticated James Bond 007, one of the coolest men in the world); Bond making his escape as Indian peasants scrabble for the banknotes he has thrown at them; a snake charmer playing the James Bond Theme on his flute; Steven Berkoff giving perhaps the hammiest performance in the history of the series; Bond in a clown suit and gorilla costume; and some full-on Benny Hill antics with Q being molested by Octopussy's girls in a hot air balloon with a Union Jack design.
Even in technical/visual terms, OCTOPUSSY is loathsome. India is totally wasted as a location, and the cinematography is flat throughout, with muddy colours. Barry's score is easily his worst. The stunts and action scenes are.... well, "workmanlike" would probably be the kindest description.
It's not a total dead loss, though. Well, not quite. Suspense and scares are (grudgingly) introduced roughly an hour and a half in, with a race against the ticking clock of an atomic warhead, although John Glen's direction is so pedestrian that it doesn't really add up to very much.
Moore gives his most charming turn to date, although one would be forgiven for wondering whether Bond should really be charming and nothing but. Mind you, the beautiful and talented Maud Adams makes a welcome return to the series; and at least OCTOPUSSY isn't a pretentious slab of gloom and doom like THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.
However, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN won the Battle of the Bonds running away, with vastly superior performances, action, locations and wit. Good job Connery and McClory were around to show the world how James Bond ought to be done in 1983, the year in which the "official" Eon series hit its All Time Low.
#22
Posted 22 April 2004 - 01:12 PM
#23
Posted 22 April 2004 - 02:45 PM
Well, I did have to ask.The makers of OCTOPUSSY should have reached a firm decision, very early on in production, as to whether they wanted to make another MOONRAKER or another FOR YOUR EYES ONLY. The car crash that is OCTOPUSSY stands as an awful cautionary tale of what you get when you decide you want to make both MOONRAKER 2 and FOR YOUR EYES ONLY 2 at the same time.
Loomis, I usually share several similar viewpoints as you, but we differ greatly on this one.For me, OCTOPUSSY is one of the very worst James Bond films ever, possibly second only to THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH as the lamest flick of the entire bunch.
Still, at least there was a decent Bond movie in 1983 - NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
I'm curious as to why you dislike OP so much.![]()
Even by Bond movie standards, OCTOPUSSY suffers from horrific lapses in logic. For instance, how would Octopussy have known that 007 was the man who caught up with her father, Dexter Smythe, and gave him "an honourable alternative"? We know she wasn't present at the time, and it seems unlikely that her old man would have phoned her up and said: "Look, love, I'm afraid I'm on the way out. You see, there's this chap James Bond, some undercover fellow who goes by the alias 007, and he's rumbled me, and...." Indeed, since she wasn't there, how would Octopussy have known about the unspoken "honourable alternative" deal at all? And, actually, since when has committing suicide rather than facing the music for what one has done been "honourable"? It's a coward's way out, no?
And while we're on the subject, what the heck gave Bond the right to offer Smythe an alternative to capture and trial? Bond's job was to take him into custody so that he could face justice, full stop - no ifs or buts, and certainly no "honourable" ways out. Did Smythe bribe 007? Did he give him some of that stolen gold in return for being given 24 hours to clean up his affairs and the opportunity to be left alone with a revolver? I think we should be told.
Still, the embarrassments of OCTOPUSSY are legion: an elderly, leering Moore tromboning the zoom lens of a video camera into a woman's cleavage (yes, folks, this is supposed to be the sophisticated James Bond 007, one of the coolest men in the world); Bond making his escape as Indian peasants scrabble for the banknotes he has thrown at them; a snake charmer playing the James Bond Theme on his flute; Steven Berkoff giving perhaps the hammiest performance in the history of the series; Bond in a clown suit and gorilla costume; and some full-on Benny Hill antics with Q being molested by Octopussy's girls in a hot air balloon with a Union Jack design.
However, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN won the Battle of the Bonds running away, with vastly superior performances, action, locations and wit. Good job Connery and McClory were around to show the world how James Bond ought to be done in 1983, the year in which the "official" Eon series hit its All Time Low.
You make some fair arguements although I can counter many of them.
I have never read it, but I think the Maj. Dexter Smythe suicide option comes directly from the novel. Blame Fleming for that one. It isn't inconceivable that Bond anonymously sent information to Smythe's family to let them know of this.
As far as racism goes, yeah, it probably won't do much for giving Westerners a better cultural view. But many other Bonds did the same things. TMWTGG has the goofy porter "Surprise" from the hotel room, the elephant kid, the family living above Lazar's workshop among them, the distracted cops, etc. Korea didn't come off a whole lot better with the farmers and their cows in DAD, a criticism leveled by several people.
As far as logic goes, OP does leave it in spades. But it's Bond. I could probably do a thesis picking YOLT apart on this basis. But what would be the point it's Bond. As I've said, the balance between the goofieness and the seriousness works for me.
NSNA vastly superior? It's different and the performances are probably better as is the wit, which is admittedly mostly juvenile in OP. But overall it pales. The locations are nothing big and the action is far from memorable compared with OP. Had they been able to go with their original concept of the film it may have been better, but as it stands, it is okay at best for me.
#24
Posted 22 April 2004 - 04:37 PM
I have never read it, but I think the Maj. Dexter Smythe suicide option comes directly from the novel. Blame Fleming for that one. It isn't inconceivable that Bond anonymously sent information to Smythe's family to let them know of this.
#25
Posted 22 April 2004 - 05:41 PM
#26
Posted 22 April 2004 - 09:01 PM
I know what you mean about trying to like certain films but just can't. I feel this way about FYEO and TSWLM, which seem to be huge fan favorites, not just here at CBn.I guess what it boils down to is that I simply don't find OCTOPUSSY an entertaining film in any way, shape or form. Believe me, I've tried to like it (hey, I'm a hardcore Bond geek, after all), but it just defeats my every attempt to do so.
I still don't think NSNA has anything on OP in terms of action or setting. I like the opening setup of Bond in the training session and the Shrublands brawl, but the underwater shark thing, the motorcycle chase and the shootout near the end are all pretty bland when compared to Bond hanging off trains and planes and sliding down stairwells shooting people.
One thing we can agree on -- I think TWINE just may have slipped to the bottom of my list below AVTA as far as favorites go. I still don't think AVTAK is a very good film, but the enthusiasm many have for it here combined with how much I like Walken and Patrick Bauchu really helps. The more I think about TWINE, the more it hurts.
#27
Posted 22 April 2004 - 09:10 PM
I feel this way about FYEO and TSWLM, which seem to be huge fan favorites, not just here at CBn.
Me too. I like TSWLM a lot more than FYEO, though, but I do find myself getting very bored at the halfway mark. Definitely the most overrated Bond flick ever, TSWLM. Give me MOONRAKER instead (widely regarded as an inferior retread of TSWLM).
I still don't think NSNA has anything on OP in terms of action or setting. I like the opening setup of Bond in the training session and the Shrublands brawl, but the underwater shark thing, the motorcycle chase and the shootout near the end are all pretty bland when compared to Bond hanging off trains and planes and sliding down stairwells shooting people.
I guess I prefer the action in NSNA because it's much more realistic than the action in OCTOPUSSY. I mean, I don't demand believable action scenes in Bond films, per se, and I enjoy overblown stunt sequences as much as the next man, as long as they're done well, but the action in OCTOPUSSY is just ludicrous (especially the final assault on the Monsoon Palace - and whose bright idea was it to have Q take part in it?). Also, I'd rather see a 50-something Bond star punching and firing at people in a vaguely credible manner than a 50-something Bond star hanging off trains and planes and sliding down stairwells shooting people.
The more I think about TWINE, the more it hurts.
Tell me about it.

#28
Posted 22 April 2004 - 09:59 PM
#29
Posted 22 April 2004 - 10:03 PM
Well put.The character fought opponents as Red Grant and Oddjob, but can't get an old German Frau out of a phone booth?

Actually, I find it hard to view OCTOPUSSY as part of the same series that includes FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE and GOLDFINGER. My head tells me it's part of the same series, but my heart sure says different!
#30
Posted 29 April 2004 - 12:03 AM
I have to completely disagree with you there. Octopussy is one of the best Moore films. It still has quite a dose of comedy, a staple for his films, the production value of the previous three movies, and it carries on the winning formula from FYEO. The characters are superbly cast and played with great skill. The plot is one of my personal favorites, tying The USSR, an Egg, A circus, a tiny plane, a Prince, and a woman named Octopussy all into one film. This is quite an achievement, and is no way "the lamest Bond film ever... second to TWINE."For me, OCTOPUSSY is one of the very worst James Bond films ever, possibly second only to THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH as the lamest flick of the entire bunch.
Still, at least there was a decent Bond movie in 1983 - NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
Maud Adams and Roger Moore have great chemistry. So does Moore and Louis Jourdan. The smoldering rage he exhibits in the backgammon scene is classic. The supporting cast, including Kristina Wayborn and Kabir Bedi is inspired. The movie also delivers something that has been missing in the series lately... suspense!!! All in all, I give OCTOPUSSY a
9/10
BTW: NSNA sucks. Thunderball was a much better film.