
What's up with today's composers?
#1
Posted 29 July 2003 - 04:37 PM
I mean, the experienced composers show a rapid decline in quality and there are not much good composers who could follow them.
Elfman's recent scores are beyond good and evil, Williams barely comes up with something fresh (which is not surprising if you consider he's now doing only about one or two scores per year) and Goldsmith isn't as good as he used to be. Same thing with other well-known composers.
And who could follow them? It seems that not many of today's composers are able to do a completely orchestral score, without any synthesized sounds.
And I don't want to start another discussion about this, but David Arnold also isn't exactly the most original composer of the world.
Maybe I'm the only one who thinks so, but I'm really bored by the recent soundtrack releases. And I don't want to stick to my "old" scores forever.
#2
Posted 29 July 2003 - 06:22 PM
while synthesized scores are okay at times, I'm just more accustomed to orchestrated music.
What I'm basically saying is to almost all film composers: Ditch the techno, go back to orchestra. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
#3
Posted 29 July 2003 - 09:26 PM
Recently, composers also begin to remove the natural reverberation of the music. Arnold did it with DAD and as far as I can remember, Williams also did it with Episode II.
What's the point in that? It's ok if it's done for cutting-edge movies like Bond, but films like Star Wars require a powerful orchestral score, IMHO.
Scores like LOTR, Star Wars or Harry Potter (to a certain degree) show us how magnificent this kind of music can be.
#4
Posted 29 July 2003 - 10:46 PM
#5
Posted 29 July 2003 - 11:08 PM
And I think that there are many motifs that are simply perfect for creating a certain mood or atmosphere and that these are "basic tools" for composers.
#6
Posted 30 July 2003 - 01:15 AM
I can tell you all from direct experience that it is very difficult coming up with original themes. While composers like Horner recycle their themes, Im glad theyre not copying other peoples work. Being a huge Media Ventures fan, I obviously love what they churn out no matter how similar it sounds... it ALWAYS makes great driving music! However, I am getting sick of how the MV group lists one composer on the score disc when they all did in fact work on the score, I wish that when we got a film score from Hans Zimmer, it was really all by Zimmer and not done by "Zimmer and friends". I mean, alot of time and hard work goes into a score so I do like theyre amount of team work with projects, but I want to hear a genuine Zimmer score. Also, as much as I love David Arnold's work and will always buy his scores... his latest bond scores have been mainly recycling themes he's come up with in the past, which i do sympathize on, but i want to hear something original. It is true that alot of the "rat pack" composers arent getting as much work as they used to, and their quality has certainly declined. I mean, Alan Silvestri (Back to the Future, Predator) was rejected from Pirates of the Carribean for the MV group. Maestro Jerry Goldsmith was rejected from the upcoming Timeline film based on the crichton book of the same name... I was REALLY looking forward to this score. Apparently it was all recorded so a bootleg release is inevidable. He was replaced by the up and coming young Brian Tyler (Frailty, Darkness Falls). Its very clear that a big film music change is about to occur, but who knows when.
Rich
#7
Posted 30 July 2003 - 11:10 AM
#8
Posted 30 July 2003 - 06:00 PM
Rich
#9
Posted 30 July 2003 - 06:12 PM
#10
Posted 30 July 2003 - 07:45 PM
And...you forgot Don Davis' Jurassic Park 3. Just for the record.
#11
Posted 30 July 2003 - 11:49 PM

#12
Posted 31 July 2003 - 03:34 PM
Rich
#13
Posted 31 July 2003 - 03:57 PM
#14
Posted 31 July 2003 - 05:05 PM
Rich
#15
Posted 01 August 2003 - 08:22 AM
I doubt there will be any brass, as Barry now likes a much more subdued score and so do I!
#16
Posted 01 August 2003 - 09:51 AM
I'm just hoping he has created a bombastic, larger than life score for what looks to be another Pixar smash.
#17
Posted 14 August 2003 - 01:43 PM
I'm also puzzled by how much praise David Arnold gets on these boards. I find him absolutely bland, I NEVER notice the music in Brosnan's Bond films (except the title songs, which I like very much, except for DAD). As weak as Kamen is, I even prefer his LTK score to Arnold's. At least I notice it, at least it manages to strike a mood in places, like the nice Spanish guitar riff theme for Sanchez (can't stand the Mexican wedding music tho). Watching Brosnan's films, it's like the music just isn't there, or it sounds exactly like every other action film for the last 10 years. It never sticks out.
Except for a little guitar, I'm no musician and have very little technical knowledge of music. I agree that so much has been done already it's hard to be original. But originality isn't necessarily the issue. For me, it's just hearing something that sounds good to my ears, that I take notice of. It may be derivative, even lazy, it just sounds great to me. I loved Shore's work on both Lord of the Rings films (I liked the second even more than the first), thought the score to Titanic was totally forgettable (and each time I hear Celine Dion's song I want to commit homicide). I am absolutely passionate about the score to Gods & Monsters, and I love the score to Gladiator, so much so that I bought the weaker second CD to it. One of my all-time favorite scores in the last 10 years is The Fugitive from 1993. I play that to death. And I think I may have to buy a new copy of the TLD cd because I'm wearing it out.
I can't bear Williams anymore. I like some of his Star Wars stuff, that's all (I liked his TV work much better). I say that even tho as a teenager and college student I bought and still have the albums to some of his big early films (Star Wars, The Fury, The Empire Strikes Back---I want to find them a good home, btw). I've always loved Goldsmith from his TV days onward but his latest stuff (including all the new Trek series) is DULL, DULL, DULL, DULL!!
I don't know the answer to your question, I just keep wishing I could hear a composer that grabs my heart and makes mush out of it like a Bernard Herrman. But that's ok, I have loads of oldies to listen to.
#18
Posted 14 August 2003 - 02:30 PM
I think Tomorrow Never Dies is still Arnold's best effort for Bond, BUT, and I know there are some people who will hate me for saying this, it is still indistinguishable from his other action/adventure scores. It sounds like he took pieces from ID4, altered them a bit and threw the Bond Theme/Surrender in.
Concerning Titanic: I thought and still do think that the film as well as the score is terribly overrated. It's not bad, it is even pretty good at some points, but definitely not worth the Academy Award.
The synthesized instruments and voices combined with a real orchestra sounds just horrible.
But after all, the one change in the movie score world that really brings me down is what's going on with Danny Elfman. Have you heard his audio commentary for the Edward Scissorhands DVD?
If you consider his statements there, his recent scores are not acceptable at all.
#19
Posted 20 August 2003 - 11:59 AM
Concerning Elfman, he's going downhill, which is a shame really, I greatly admire a lot of his scores. I think scores mixed with synthesized sounds can sound pretty awesome (we
#20
Posted 20 August 2003 - 01:03 PM
Originally posted by Lotman
I disagree with what you say about John Williams; his latest scores prove his maestroship I guess. I am not that fond of his 'Hook' and Harry Potter sound, but take Amistad,
I'll grant you the Amistad example, definitely. I'd forgotten that one. I liked that very much. Again, it's just whatever sounds good to my untrained ears.
#21
Posted 20 August 2003 - 01:23 PM
#22
Posted 20 August 2003 - 01:26 PM
Originally posted by rafterman
it's a hard job, pure and simple...as far as the new djs turned composers thing, well that's a bit like Barry when he got his start, I think that's where a lot of fresh blood will come from, people who come from a unique background...I really like the Badly Drawn Boy score for About A Boy, plenty of songs, but also lots of instrumental tracks and such, perfect different score for the film...
Oh thanks for reminding me about this! I keep meaning to buy it, I loved that soundtrack.
#23
Posted 01 September 2003 - 07:14 PM
I'll tell you who can combine techno and orchestral quite well: CRAIG ARMSTRONG. He's a relative newcomer to the film scoring biz, but he is already making his mark. In fact, Michael Caine told Philip Noyce that he would only star in THE QUIET AMERICAN (for which Caine was nominated a Best Actor Oscar this past show) if Craig Armstrong would score it.
Below is a short filmography of Armstrong's work. His sounds are chilly, brooding, ominous, evocative, but heartfelt and resonant. I highly recommend him.
PLUNKETT AND MCLEANE
BEST LAID PLANS
THE BONE COLLECTOR
KISS OF THE DRAGON
THE QUIET AMERICAN
MOULIN ROUGE
THE QUIET AMERICAN is particularly good. It reminds me of BEYOND RANGOON, before Hans Zimmer went on a testosterone-overload. Men and their nuts, I swear....
#24
Posted 01 September 2003 - 07:35 PM
He is rather like Barry - but even more 'classy' and his choice of intruments is excellent.
#25
Posted 03 September 2003 - 05:08 PM
Originally posted by Kristian
I'm somewhat of a film score collector, and I have to say that using techno is not necessarily a bad thing. The problem is that there are far too few composers who can use it effectively. Too often, Hans Zimmer's recent scores end up discordant and unsatisfying. Indeed, the only real breath-taking tracks from GLADIATOR are the last three with Lisa Gerrard's electrifying vocals. Other than that, it is a standard Zimmer action score. Which is to say, loud and noisy and no harmony (THE PEACEMAKER and DROP ZONE anyone?) Hannibal was good and haunting, Tears of the Sun was exciting, but again, neither was nowhere near as satisfying as BEYOND RANGOON and BLACK RAIN, two of Zimmer's finest pieces from early on. It's like he said, "**** it, no more of this emotional chick stuff" and started smashing a bunch of garbage cans with a Louisville Slugger.
I'll tell you who can combine techno and orchestral quite well: CRAIG ARMSTRONG. He's a relative newcomer to the film scoring biz, but he is already making his mark. In fact, Michael Caine told Philip Noyce that he would only star in THE QUIET AMERICAN (for which Caine was nominated a Best Actor Oscar this past show) if Craig Armstrong would score it.
Below is a short filmography of Armstrong's work. His sounds are chilly, brooding, ominous, evocative, but heartfelt and resonant. I highly recommend him.
PLUNKETT AND MCLEANE
BEST LAID PLANS
THE BONE COLLECTOR
KISS OF THE DRAGON
THE QUIET AMERICAN
MOULIN ROUGE
THE QUIET AMERICAN is particularly good. It reminds me of BEYOND RANGOON, before Hans Zimmer went on a testosterone-overload. Men and their nuts, I swear....
Kristian, I very much liked this post, thanks so much for the recommendations! I heartily agree with you about BEYOND RANGOON (I hadn't known the name of the composer). I liked it when I saw the film and then later some friends bought the soundtrack and played it often whenever I visited. And I liked the score to THE QUIET AMERICAN very much. (I loved everything about that movie and think Caine was robbed at the Oscars). I hadn't known about Caine's sentiment re Armstrong. I have to say, tho, the score to MOULIN ROUGE didn't do a lot for me.
From Kingdom Come:
Jaelle, I agree with you re. Arnold's scores. If you are looking for very beautiful writing, try Gabriel Yared - composer of The Talented Mr Ripley / City Of Angels / The English Patient...
He is rather like Barry - but even more 'classy' and his choice of intruments is excellent.[/B]
Ah yes, I do have The English Patient soundtrack, liked that very much. You're not the first person to recommend The Talented Mr. Ripley to me (both film and score--I just never got around to seeing the film when it came out). All these recommendations are great.
#26
Posted 04 September 2003 - 06:35 PM
#27
Posted 04 September 2003 - 07:02 PM
Rich
#28
Posted 04 September 2003 - 07:09 PM
Although, going back to Silvestri, it's such a huge shame that he didn't get to do the POTC score like he was supposed to. That really could've been AMAZING.
#29
Posted 04 September 2003 - 07:22 PM

Rich
#30
Posted 04 September 2003 - 07:26 PM
Either way, CRADLE is still a damn enjoyable score.