219 replies to this topic

[MattofSteel]

Morning. I just had the weirdest dream, that I woke up at 3am to watch the SPECTRE trailer and it was amazing and they even used a new and they even used Barry's "OHMSS" as the music OH WAIT

[Logie]

I don't want to tempt fate or anything, but I think this might be the best film of all time and everything's going to be totally great forever.

[Turn]

Now I am blown away.

 

I wasn't as taken by the teaser as several others were and now I've got what I wanted out of a Bond trailer -- to be adrenalized, not just intrigued. I was having frightening visions of Skyfall 2.

 

Whereas I previously thought the MI: Rogue Nation Trailer was it, this SPECTRE trailer has basically reduced that one to just the money shot of the plane stunt. Now we have intrigue and action in the perfect blend. 

 

The worst part: I have to wait another 3-plus months to see it.

[Marketto007]

The trailer blew my mind. Simply as that. And now Mr. Waltz, you will keep denying???

 

[antovolk]

Now the question of the day is....will there be a 3rd, final trailer? I know SF didn't have one but now most if not all blockbusters follow the teaser-theatrical-final campaign structure.

[Guy Haines]

The two trailers - teaser in March and now this one - contained three lines I like already, spoken by villains of course;
Mr White - "I always knew death would wear a familiar face..... but not yours." and "You're a kite dancing in a hurricane, Mr. Bond"
And now we have Oberhauser's "It was me, James. I was the author of all your pain."
Hope all three make the final cut.

[antovolk]

For those also wanting to pick this trailer apart - I'm uploading a set of hi-res (without the YouTube compression) screencaps right now....as well as a "super HD 1080p" version of the trailer with 5.1 hi-res surround audio for downloading and playing on your home cinema setups

UPDATE: HI-RES SCREENCAPS - 137 of them, at least one per each shot in the trailer: https://www.flickr.c...157656192638072

Edited by antovolk, 22 July 2015 - 03:20 PM.

[coco1997]

Goodness gracious, this trailer blew my socks right off. So much to digest, but what immediately stands out is the stuff that harkens back to the early films (the Q/Aston Martin scene, Bond in a white dinner jacket, snowy escapades). 

 

Someone posted a page or so back that Newman recorded that "OHMSS" cue just for the trailer, which is disappointing if true, as it would imply the cue won't find its way into the actual film. 

 

Also, that shot of the helicopter rolling in midair = A nod to the barrel roll in TMWTGG? 

[Dustin]

Good call on that helicopter stunt, could well be. What I love is Waltz' Nuru-jacket...

[Alex Zamudio]

Loved it,  I´m very excited about this film, it seems to have the right combination of Spy-Fi Fantasy and spy thriller (as Goldfinger had) that makes up a great Bond Flick in my opinion. I do wish in a way that Bond wasn´t connected personally to Spectre (as it seems to be). But even though, this trailer reveals a stylish thrilling movie, can´t wait!

[Navy007Fan]

After several viewings, Ms. Seydoux saying "It's called SPECTRE" still sends shivers down my spine.  I have been waiting since the early 80s to see SPECTRE on screen again, and I'm finally going to see it!  Bring on November 6th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pushkin]

I do like the trailer a lot. It is stunning and dialogue looks great but I have two concerns:

 

1) I too would like to move on from Bond goes rogue/ this time its personal theme. It's pretty clear to me he has gone completely rogue given the dressing down M gives him. What I would have preferred would have been a situation where M fundamentally trusts Bond and asks him to go rogue - to do something off the books that cannot be officially sanctioned. I believe they have done that before I can't think of the film.

 

2) I do have some concerns of where this personal story is going. Specifically, this line concerns me "It was me, James. I was the author of all your pain." I have stayed almost completely spoiler free and don't know for certain what it means. But it could mean a few things and one of those worries me as a story line:

 

Spoiler

 If it simply means, Christoph Waltz's character was behind the actions of Quantum (CR and QoS) and even the events of SF, I don't have a problem. But I do worry that it could mean that Christoph Waltz's character was somehow responsible for the death of Bond's parents. Were they the one's shot thru the windshield in the car instead of the equivalent of Tracy? That possibility is a little too psychological for me. The Bond in the novels did brood from time to time and I have liked that part of Craig's portrayal. But this would be far too personal: The man responsible also killed your parents Bond. Ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?  

Edited by Pushkin, 22 July 2015 - 05:34 PM.

[antovolk]

the "super-HD" copy with the highest quality video and surround sound audio for your home theatres:

https://mega.co.nz/#...X9WrRIxKOrX5arE

(if you have issues with dialogue coming from the left hand side, switch to the second Dolby Digital AC3 track. Turns out it's an issue with some older players and VLC player with LPCM lossless audio)

[Silva25]

I do like the trailer a lot. It is stunning and dialogue looks great but I have two concerns:

 

1) I too would like to move on from Bond goes rogue/ this time its personal theme. It's pretty clear to me he has gone completely rogue given the dressing down M gives him. What I would have preferred would have been a situation where M fundamentally trusts Bond and asks him to go rogue - to do something off the books that cannot be officially sanctioned. I believe they have done that before I can't think of the film.

 

2) I do have some concerns of where this personal story is going. Specifically, this line concerns me "It was me, James. I was the author of all your pain." I have stayed almost completely spoiler free and don't know for certain what it means. But it could mean a few things and one of those worries me as a story line:

 

Spoiler

 If it simply means, Christoph Waltz's character was behind the actions of Quantum (CR and QoS) and even the events of SF, I don't have a problem. But I do worry that it could mean that Christoph Waltz's character was somehow responsible for the death of Bond's parents. Were they the one's shot thru the windshield in the car instead of the equivalent of Tracy? That possibility is a little too psychological for me. The Bond in the novels did brood from time to time and I have liked that part of Craig's portrayal. But this would be far too personal: The man responsible also killed your parents Bond. Ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?  

Spoiler

I kind of doubt that they'll go that far.  It'd mean that Oberhauser killed Bond's parents when he was just a kid, and I don't think that that'll end up being the case.  I find it much more likely that it simply means that Oberhauser was involved in (either directly or indirectly) all of the villains plots that happened in all of the Craig films (indirectly in Silva's case I think), which I'm also fine with.

Edited by Silva25, 22 July 2015 - 07:26 PM.

[Blofeld's Cat]

This time it's personaler.

Yes, it certainly seems that way. The if the next movie becomes any more "personaler" it'll be a soap opera!

[tdalton]

This time it's personaler.

Yes, it certainly seems that way. The if the next movie becomes any more "personaler" it'll be a soap opera!

I think we've already reached that point.

[PeteNeon]

There's something about Bond's jackets that just look too prestine when shot digitally! It looks like he's literally just bought it and tried it on. I'm thinking of the shot near the start where he's aiming with the gun.

 

Also, grow your hair out Daniel, it looks so much better longer!

 

Other than that, great trailer!

[PeteNeon]

Also, why are the gadgets in the DB10 marked with Dymo labels, and they look bolted onto the dashboard? I'm not a fan of the retro schtick, like with Bond's pistol in Skyfall, it looked very old-fashioned! Can we have a shiny working new car with built-in gadgets some time?

[stromberg]

Noticed the Dymo labels, too, and was just about to mention them. It was done the same way in the Goldfinger DB5, and it's clearly a reference. And when you look at Q's lab in the DB10 presentation scene with its retro factory atmosphere, the DB9, the DB5 and that Norton bike from that Clapperboard shot lurking in the background, Dymo labels are just the thing you'd expect to come from a shop like that.

[The Shark]

There's something about Bond's jackets that just look too prestine when shot digitally!

It's shot on 35mm film.
 

Also, grow your hair out Daniel, it looks so much better longer!

It's got more length than in Skyfall. Just how long do you want it? 

 

 

[DaveBond21]

Intrigued to see M fighting with Denbigh. M gets some action again.

[DamnCoffee]

Woah. This has to be some kind of record, right?

 

[sharpshooter]

The general public and the fan base are hungry for this movie. Skyfall's box-office record is within reach. 

[DaveBond21]

Everyone loves Bond!

 

Even the non-Bond fans in my office are watching the trailer today.

[sharpshooter]

Everyone loves Bond!

 

Even the non-Bond fans in my office are watching the trailer today.

I've seen a story on the Herald Sun (a Melbourne newspaper for non Australian users) about the new trailer, and all of the comments are enthusiastic. 

[007jamesbond]

Woah. This has to be some kind of record, right?

 

 

551 are secretly SPECTRE but I think it could get to 10 to 20 million mark by end of the month 

[ElFenomeno]

great trailer.

my only desire, as it was with Skyfall, is that we hear the full, proper Bond theme during one major action scene. like proper theme. no Breadcrumbs please. or an interpertation . or the beggining, or a hint of the theme. no Sir, I want it loud. 

[Shrublands]

 

Woah. This has to be some kind of record, right?

 

 

551 are secretly SPECTRE but I think it could get to 10 to 20 million mark by end of the month 

 

 

Agreed. It's over 5 million already. 

[SecretAgentFan]

This being the internet and me being very nerdist in this case, can I state my impatience in regard to a new film poster for SPECTRE?  The new trailer really makes me want to see that, too! 

[Dustin]

Seconded! And please, please make it a better job than Skyfall's!