Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

QuantumOfRoyale's Quantum of Solace Review


8 replies to this topic

#1 QuantumOfRoyale

QuantumOfRoyale

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 69 posts

Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:44 AM

((Okay, this review was written by me last year for my school newspaper, so...yeah. That's the audience I was writing for :P Hope you enjoy the review anyway!))

To begin, I don't think I need to bother explaining who James Bond is or why millions of fans love him so much. The smooth-talking, tough as nails, womanizing British secret agent, originally created by Ian Fleming who wrote several novels around the character's exploits before they were translated to film, has become a cultural icon with over twenty movies based on him having been released since 1962; the earliest of which all of defined the spy genre and influenced many later films such as the "Mission: Impossible" series, and has been portrayed by six different actors since his cinematic inception, which each actor putting their own unique spin on the character.

Everyone has their own favorite version of James Bond, and my personal favorite to this day is still the one that started it all: Sean Connery (my least favorite is Pierce Brosnan, but let's not go there). He really set the standards for what Bond should be like: smooth, witty, constantly mixing business with pleasure, and always able to find a way to beat the bad guys, get the girl, and come out on top.

But over time, the series succumbed to a great level of silliness and camp, so much do until, following the invisible cars and mind-controlling North Korean villains of Brosnan's final few Bond films, Agent 007 took a four year cinematic hiatus until 2004 where director Martin Campbell (who had previously directed the first Brosnan bond film "GoldenEye" in 1995 and would later go on to direct the disappointing 2011 blockbuster "Green Lantern") returned to helm the modern day Bond reboot "Casino Royale": starring relative newcomer Daniel Craig as the iconic character, and grounding the series in realism: no Q providing Bond with gadgets for his missions, and no super-villains plotting to take over the world for Bond to stop.

Following its release, "Casino Royale" was a complete critical and commercial success, with interest in the James Bond franchise being revitalized by the general audience. So much so, that a sequel, headed by director Marc Foster (who had previously helmed Johnny Depp's 2004 hit film "Finding Neverland") and soon entitled "Quantum of Solace" was immediately rushed into production, where we would find Daniel Craig back as Bond, this time facing off against QUANTUM, a mass worldwide organization of criminals that revealed itself at the end of "Casino Royale" that are no doubt based off of the SPECTRE organization of the 1960s Bond films.

However, upon its 2008 release, "Quantum of Solace" was immediately panned by critics and fans alike. But today, we're going to try and find out if all of their complaints are truly justified, and if Daniel Craig's second run out as Agent 007 really was as bad as most filmgoers believe.

First, let us look at the characters of "Quantum of Solace" first: starting with Bond himself, then moving onto his one or more romantic interests throughout the movie (also known as "Bond girls"), and then finally the film's primary antagonist (obviously dubbed the "Bond villain" by fans).

In “Casino Royale”, Daniel Craig reintroduced the general audience to James Bond, but as a very different Bond than we were used to. This Bond was arrogant, cold-blooded, and murderous, rarely cracking jokes or showing any mercy to his opponents, a far cry from the personalities of Connery’s Bond or especially Roger Moore’s Bond. But once Bond crosses paths with Vesper Lynd, he falls in love with her and undergoes a major personality change. He quits MI6 and him and Vesper plan on living the rest of their lives together in the City of Lovers. That is, until the rug is pulled out from under him as it is revealed that Vesper is working with a shady organization (QUANTUM) represented by Mr. White (played once again by Jesper Christensen who reprises his role in this film), and Bond is unable to save her from her untimely demise, in doing so learning a painful truth: in his profession, no one can be trusted.

So with all of that said, in “Quantum of Solace”, Bond is in an even worse place than he was at the beginning of “Casino Royale”. He’s back to his unfeeling, murderous self, but to so much more of a degree than in any Bond that we’ve ever seen before, kind of like what Bond should have been like after “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”. Many fans complain that Bond’s extreme bitterness and utter desire for revenge against Vesper’s killers makes the movie not feel like a Bond flick, but I think that this is a mix of the exact mood that the film was trying to create and the general feel of a Daniel Craig movie. This ‘aint Roger Moore anymore people, and thank God for that! Plus, by the end of the movie Bond’s character arc that spanned two movies is completed when Bond comes face to face with Vesper’s former secret lover and a hardened QUANTUM agent who used her to get to Bond…and does not kill him. As Renee Mathis (a particularly fun Bond ally played by Giancarlo Giannini, who also reprises his role from “Casino Royale”) requests of Bond in his dying words, Bond needed to forgive Vesper and more importantly, he needed to forgive himself. And, when he matures enough to do so, evidenced by leaving the man he loathes more than anything alive, we have the movie conclude with the classic Bond gunbarrel sequence, to show that this younger Bond that is more of an inexperienced novice is maturing into the Bond that we have seen in earlier films. And hopefully now in “Skyfall”, the 23rd Bond film that will come out later this year, we’ll get to see Craig portray a Bond that’s a little wiser, a little more hardened, a little less murderous, and is really like the Agent 007 we grew to love back in 1962 with “Dr. No”.

Moving onto the Bond girls, there’s really not too much to talk about. The main Bond girl, Bolivian nationalist Camille Montes, played by Olga Kurylenko, is a pretty boring character. She’s not really all that attractive, has very little personality, and her revenge storyline is exceedingly lazy. Like Noomi Rapace’s character in “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows”, Camille only seems to be there at all to get the plot moving, and Bond actually DOES in fact forget about her halfway through the movie. However, the other Bond girl, MI6 Agent Strawberry Fields, on the other hand is much more engaging. Actress Gemma Arterton chose to base Fields off of the Bond girls of the classic 1960s Bond movies such as “Dr. No’s” Honey Ryder and “Goldfinger’s” Pussy Galore, who are still my favorite Bond girls of the entire series. Fields’ scenes with Bond are a lot of quick-witted fun, and remind you of the good old days of James Bond, yet sadly her character is exceedingly wasted and is killed off in a quick, albeit creative way that is also a fun reference to “Goldfinger” that die-hard Bond fans will enjoy. Two disappointing Bond girls this time around, neither of which were able to hold up to Eva Green’s amazing performance as Vesper Lynd in “Casino Royale”. But then again, I never expected them to in the first place, and the Bond girls aren’t really the focus here anyways.

And for this Bond outing, we have philanthropist and leading member of QUANTUM, Dominic Greene, played by Mathieu Amalric, as our Bond villain. But Greene is a very different adversary for 007 than we've ever seen before. Most of the best Bond villains have always had little quirks about them to define themselves as the movie's "bad guy", such as facial scars, or metal teeth, obsessions with certain objects or colors, or even, in the case of Le Chiffre, the terrifyingly awesome villain of "Casino Royale", an inhaler and defective tear duct resulting in severe constant eye-bleeding. But Greene has none of these, in fact at first glance, he seems like a pretty alright guy. He's an environmental philanthropist, goes to operas, and throws charity parties. But looks are clearly deceiving, as Greene is really a murderous, psychotic mastermind, and a nice challenge for Bond. His "evil plan" is a little wonky, but he's an interesting kind of Bond villain in his subtlety, and, while he's no Dr. No, Red Grant, Goldfinger, or Le Chiffre, he's an interesting albeit only adequate villain.

But what this all boils down to is: is "Quantum of Solace" better than "Casino Royale"? Well, no, but wouldn't expecting that be completely unrealistic? "Casino Royale" is the veritable crown jewel of the Bond franchise, putting a new spin on and old character to reintroduce him and make him relatable to a modern audience while still having him satisfy longtime fans of the series. Expecting "Quantum of Solace" to top that, during a Writer's Strike no less, would be completely unreasonable.

But that being said, "Quantum of Solace" can still hold its own as an above average Bond movie, definitely nowhere near the series' worst. Other highlights I haven't even touched on are the always-exotic location shootings from Italy to Bolivia and from Russia to Cuba, the score by David Arnold is more good old-fashioned fast paced spy music that was introduced in "Casino Royale", Judi Dench's turns in another great performance as M, leaving you only wishing to see Moneypenny and Q back in a Bond movie and soon, and a particular metaphorical sequence at the Tosca Opera House is exceedingly well shot and directed, and is one of my favorite moments of the entire series.

So in conclusion, "Quantum of Solace" is flawed, yes, but certainly not the bane of the series that fans make it out to be. Expectations were too high after "Casino Royale's" massive success, so of course there would be complaining. But "Quantum of Solace" really does have a lot going for it, certainly enough to keep a die-hard Bond fan like me, and a huge fan of Daniel Craig's Bond, happy enough, and whetting my thirst for more Bond, which will be quenched later this year with the release of the 23rd Bond film: "Skyfall". But until then, haters can hate, but "Quantum of Solace" only further solidifies in my mind that even an average Daniel Craig Bond movie can still be an exceedingly fun, although flawed, flick.

"Quantum of Solace": 3.75 / 5

P.S. (The truly horrible opening credits song "Another Way to Die" by Jack White and Alicia Keys docked 0.25 / 5 off the score. It really is that bad...)

#2 Harry Fawkes

Harry Fawkes

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2229 posts
  • Location:Malta G.C

Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:43 PM

Simply put, Quantum of Solace is a fantastic Bond film - one of my best along with SKYFALL. Daniel Craig is my best Bond so far and, dare I say it, outshines Sean by a mile, if not more.

I could never understand why the heck it was put down in most reviews I've read but then I understand and agree (and respect) that everyone is entitled to their own opinions which is why I'm posting my own.

For me QOS worked fine and more, much more, and every time I watch it I never seem to get fed up of it (unlike other Bond films I re-watch now and then).

From the breathtaking opening sequence to the absolutely marvelous end credits, the film has me on the edge of my seat every time.

I also think Quantum's objectives of damming Bolivia's supply of fresh water to create a monopoly is very, very intelligent and indeed sinister.

I also love Arnold's score. I think it is fabulous, one of the best in the series, and (forgive me for taking this from SKYFALL's official review) fits like a bloody glove.

So, to conclude and after four years, I may happily say that Quantum of Solace is one of the best, if not the best, Bond movie of all time!

In my book of course :-)

#3 QuantumOfRoyale

QuantumOfRoyale

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 69 posts

Posted 30 October 2012 - 05:10 PM

Yes, Quantum of Solace is quite brilliant. I don't get all the haters. I omnly wish that more of the short story apart from the excellent title had been incorporated into it, though.


I read an interview with Purvis and Wade that in their initial draft of the script, they had Mathis tell Bond the same story that the Governor tells in the original story, during the scene on the airplane, but it was never filmed due to time constraints.

Shame.

#4 QuantumOfRoyale

QuantumOfRoyale

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 69 posts

Posted 30 October 2012 - 10:37 PM



Yes, Quantum of Solace is quite brilliant. I don't get all the haters. I omnly wish that more of the short story apart from the excellent title had been incorporated into it, though.


I read an interview with Purvis and Wade that in their initial draft of the script, they had Mathis tell Bond the same story that the Governor tells in the original story, during the scene on the airplane, but it was never filmed due to time constraints.

Shame.


Yes, this is what I suggested on here back in 2008 - have Mathis deliver the story Bond got told the Governor when Mathis meets Bond at his castle. This scene should have really been included instead of some many action sequences.


I actually like your idea better. Maybe Bond could have gotten drunk and had the whole airplane scene thing with Mathis at the castle, he could've told the story, and then left the movie. Then we would've had less characters to deal with and instead developed the characters we already had more. Plus then Mathis could've stayed alive and returned for the future.

#5 Iceskater101

Iceskater101

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2398 posts
  • Location:Midwest, MN

Posted 04 November 2012 - 03:52 PM

Nice review and it is something I completely agree with, it could never be better than Casino Royale, but that's okay. I mean Casino Royale was just to jumpstart the series. Very detailed and thoughtful review.

#6 occhile007

occhile007

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Location:United States

Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:17 AM

I don't know about any of the so called critics/haters, but if I would have lost the one I loved, I would completed pi@@ed off and in the exact same state of mind as Bond. Craig was excellent, Kurlenko was excellent and of course Dench was great, too. The on set locations were amazing, the Aston Martin chase was a bad a## opening, the opera scene was iconic and the score was Arnold's best. My only complaint was the editing, but thank goodness that will be correcting with the return of Stuart Baird in Skyfall. Overall, I guess you have to be a true Bond fan to respect this movie, or just understand what it would be like to lose someone. That haters are always gonna hate, but too bad for them.


"I don't think the dead care about vengeance."

Edited by occhile007, 05 November 2012 - 12:17 AM.


#7 QuantumOfRoyale

QuantumOfRoyale

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 69 posts

Posted 05 November 2012 - 01:12 AM

I don't know about any of the so called critics/haters, but if I would have lost the one I loved, I would completed pi@@ed off and in the exact same state of mind as Bond. Craig was excellent, Kurlenko was excellent and of course Dench was great, too. The on set locations were amazing, the Aston Martin chase was a bad a## opening, the opera scene was iconic and the score was Arnold's best. My only complaint was the editing, but thank goodness that will be correcting with the return of Stuart Baird in Skyfall. Overall, I guess you have to be a true Bond fan to respect this movie, or just understand what it would be like to lose someone. That haters are always gonna hate, but too bad for them.


"I don't think the dead care about vengeance."


Believe it or not...the editing has actually grown on me. I think it works extremely well especially during both the opening car chase and the Tosca scene. It's just unorthodox and it takes time to get used to.

#8 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:37 AM

Nice review!

I like 'Quantum Of Solace' too - I can watch it easier than some other Bond films, 'Thunderball' springs to mind (ooh, controversial!) and know it has its faults and it's not too rich a story, but it's action packed and easy to follow and not too serious for the brain.

Plus another remarkable performance by Daniel Craig, and one of THE best pre-title sequences in the 50 year series.

#9 occhile007

occhile007

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Location:United States

Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:21 PM

Everytime I watch this movie, a few of the scenes remind of The Spy Who Loved Me...Bond dropping the bodyguard off the building, Bond and Cami walking through the desert in a tuxedo and dress. Just a thought. I think as time goes by, more people will have grown respect for this movie.