I wonder if it's supposed to be the same one he won in CR.
Edited by doublenoughtspy, 11 December 2011 - 11:36 AM.
Posting to original source
Posted 10 December 2011 - 03:59 PM
Edited by doublenoughtspy, 11 December 2011 - 11:36 AM.
Posting to original source
Posted 10 December 2011 - 04:03 PM
Posted 10 December 2011 - 04:11 PM
Posted 10 December 2011 - 04:16 PM
Posted 10 December 2011 - 04:25 PM
Bond was in his personal time in the Ocean Club so I assume he was gambling with his own money. I´m willing to bet the DB5 is his. It´d be more true to Fleming.I think in CR he was gambling with Mi6's money, so technically the DB5 should belong to Mi6. I do like the idea of Bond having a personal car though; it reminds me of the book Bond.
Posted 10 December 2011 - 05:54 PM
Posted 10 December 2011 - 07:44 PM
just saw a stunt scene from the new bond film. #London
http://twitpic.com/7r0cf8
Aston martin db5?
Posted 10 December 2011 - 08:51 PM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 04:54 AM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 05:30 AM
Yeah, I think there's a solid chance it's the same one from CR.My guess is that it's the same one from Casino and it's Bonds personal car.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 05:36 AM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:31 AM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:03 AM
It makes sense for the car to be the one from CASINO ROYALE. Otherwise, the film would have to come up with some explanation of why Bond is using a different DB5.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:15 AM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:16 AM
What would you prefer then? What would show some imagination? What would you consider to be something that is not lazy?Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:27 AM
What would you prefer then? What would show some imagination? What would you consider to be something that is not lazy?
Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:38 AM
Really? You think that taking a car that has featured in the past two films is the spirit of "fearless individuality"? Sure, there might be a new model of DBS out, but I doubt there is much to distinguish it from previous models.A new Aston Martin? Another DBS?
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:55 AM
Really? You think that taking a car that has featured in the past two films is the spirit of "fearless individuality"? Sure, there might be a new model of DBS out, but I doubt there is much to distinguish it from previous models.
A new Aston Martin? Another DBS?
Posted 11 December 2011 - 11:14 AM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 11:19 AM
Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
Back in the day when EON had courage to move forward and not look back, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton got nowhere near a DB5.
But I guess that was back in the day when EON were more creative and did not need to rely on the baggage of the past to produce "classic" Bond.
Disappointing.
PS - I also feel anyone expecting any continue with the DB5 in CR is likely to be let down; fanboy continuity will not be a concern of the filmakers.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 11:34 AM
Edited by Dustin, 11 December 2011 - 11:49 AM.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 11:47 AM
Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
Back in the day when EON had courage to move forward and not look back, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton got nowhere near a DB5.
But I guess that was back in the day when EON were more creative and did not need to rely on the baggage of the past to produce "classic" Bond.
Disappointing.
PS - I also feel anyone expecting any continue with the DB5 in CR is likely to be let down; fanboy continuity will not be a concern of the filmakers.
Well, I prefer to look at it this way.
The Bond of the early books kept a classic car as his personal car (the pre-1930 Bentley 4 ½ litre).
Keeping and maintaining a classic car for the love of driving it, shows an important part of his character.
Using the DB5 in a modern day set Bond story, in the same way the old Bentley was used in the 50s, makes perfect sense to me and I’m pleased to see it.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 11:53 AM
Well, I prefer to look at it this way.
The Bond of the early books kept a classic car as his personal car (the pre-1930 Bentley 4 ½ litre).
Keeping and maintaining a classic car for the love of driving it, shows an important part of his character.
Using the DB5 in a modern day set Bond story, in the same way the old Bentley was used in the 50s, makes perfect sense to me and I’m pleased to see it.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 02:51 PM
I totally agree. The DB5 is Bond's own car - won in CR - and it's really great to see it back.
There's a pic in the dreaded Daily Star today - just took a look in the shop 'coz I will not pay for that paper - but it did have a new snap from Friday night's
shoot showing the DB5 on a low loader - used for filming - and there are def two people in the car. A glimpse of white hair strongly suggests M sat in the left
passenger's seat and we can see Bond in the right driver's seat. Obviously Bond has had the drive converted from left to right since bringing it back from the Bahamas.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:08 PM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:19 PM
What would you prefer then? What would show some imagination? What would you consider to be something that is not lazy?
Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
A new Aston Martin? Another DBS? A shift to a Bentely Continental GT convertible?
But that's not my point. Sticking Daniel Craig (and previously Pierce Brosnan) in Sean Connery's car is just cheap. It is a 47 year old vehicle, it has no credibility. It is just for the association of imagery, and substitutes for fearless individuality, the creation of sometiming new but equally classic Bond, rather than rely on the wheeling out of a 47 year old cliche.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:30 PM
A new Aston Martin? Another DBS? A shift to a Bentely Continental GT convertible?
What would you prefer then? What would show some imagination? What would you consider to be something that is not lazy?
Very lazy, unimaginative cinema. Just as it was in GE and CR.
But that's not my point. Sticking Daniel Craig (and previously Pierce Brosnan) in Sean Connery's car is just cheap. It is a 47 year old vehicle, it has no credibility. It is just for the association of imagery, and substitutes for fearless individuality, the creation of sometiming new but equally classic Bond, rather than rely on the wheeling out of a 47 year old cliche.
You might be looking at the wrong series if your expectations are of anything very much else.
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:46 PM
Posted 11 December 2011 - 07:49 PM
Posted 14 December 2011 - 10:56 PM