Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

What should the title of Bond 24 be?


292 replies to this topic

#271 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 11 February 2013 - 05:38 AM

Thing is, there is a reason Ian Fleming wrote those titles for chapters and not full books.



#272 Revelator

Revelator

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 11 February 2013 - 07:47 AM

Given how good Fleming was with titles, even his chapter titles have promise. And why should short story titles be privileged over them, when many  are certainly better than "007 in New York" or "Risico"?



#273 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:40 AM

I suppose the problem is many of Fleming's phrases and chapter titles would make good stand-alone titles, just not for what's expected from a Bond film nowadays. Plus I think Eon want to avoid the scraping-the-barrel impression, otherwise SKYFALL would probably have been called something else (GAMBIT OF SHAME?) already.

Edited by Dustin, 11 February 2013 - 08:43 AM.


#274 Hockey Mask

Hockey Mask

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1027 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:52 PM

A while back I went through all of Fleming's chapter titles to see if any could be usable film titles. I came up with the following list. Obviously not every  title will be to everyone's liking, but it's an interesting enough pool to select from:

 

 

A Whisper of Love, A Whisper of Hate

Cards With a Stranger

The Eye That Never Sleeps

Bitter Champagne

We Don't Like Mistakes

The Job Comes Second

Death is So Permanent

The Slaughterer

The Wizard of Ice

The Beautiful Lure

Black on Pink

The Killing Bottle

Ten Pints of Blood

The Finger on the Trigger

The Long Scream

Reflections in a Double Bourbon

The Pressure Room

Crime de la Crime

The Richest Man in History

Take It Easy Mr. Bond

SPECTRE

How to Eat a Girl

When the Kissing Stopped

The Shadower

The Gambit of Shame

Death For Breakfast

Downhill Only

Fork Left For Hell

Blood-lift

Hell's Delight

The Death Collector

Slay It With Flowers

The Question Room

Blood and Thunder

The Easy Grand

I just don't see that one happening.



#275 seawolfnyy

seawolfnyy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4763 posts
  • Location:La Rioja

Posted 11 February 2013 - 06:36 PM

How about just simply Bond 24?



#276 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 11 February 2013 - 06:44 PM

How about just "BOND"?



#277 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:08 PM

The title should be Bond, James Bond 



#278 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:18 AM

Revelator has something with 'The Wizard of Ice.' I proposed that for the title of Bond 20. That's where it might have fit - instead of the BA inflight magazine referring to Graves as 'the King of Diamonds.'



#279 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:36 PM

Given how good Fleming was with titles, even his chapter titles have promise. And why should short story titles be privileged over them, when many  are certainly better than "007 in New York" or "Risico"?

 

I think you're missing the point. My point, at least, was that they shouldn't be picking around the floor for scraps of whatever's left over of Fleming's chapter titles and such at all. They need to get creative and stop clinging - even moreso I say to stop with the constant homaging, as if a new Bond film would fail without a bunch of nods and wanks to previous films.

At the end of the day they need to write an original story anyway, so just get on with it - get into the *spirit* of Fleming. Write it well and a good title will come *from* it, rather than desperately scrounging chapter titles and then trying to fit in a story that suits it.. you know what I mean?



#280 The Man In A Suit

The Man In A Suit

    Recruit

  • Crew
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:05 AM

Everything Or Nothing



#281 Revelator

Revelator

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:16 PM

Given how good Fleming was with titles, even his chapter titles have promise. And why should short story titles be privileged over them, when many  are certainly better than "007 in New York" or "Risico"?

 

I think you're missing the point. My point, at least, was that they shouldn't be picking around the floor for scraps of whatever's left over of Fleming's chapter titles and such at all. They need to get creative and stop clinging - even moreso I say to stop with the constant homaging, as if a new Bond film would fail without a bunch of nods and wanks to previous films.

At the end of the day they need to write an original story anyway, so just get on with it - get into the *spirit* of Fleming. Write it well and a good title will come *from* it, rather than desperately scrounging chapter titles and then trying to fit in a story that suits it.. you know what I mean?

 

I think you're missing mine in turn. The best way to get into the spirit of Fleming is to actually use him, not ape him. Fleming was a master at titles, and even the titles for his chapters tend to be better than anything the scriptwriters can come up with when being "creative" (Die Another Day or Tomorrow Never Dies anyone?). And in the case of Quantum of Solace the problem was that they didn't fit the story to suit the title, or at the very least didn't provide an adequate explanation for the relevance of the title. Skyfall succeeded as a title only because it referred back to a location of great importance to the film--on its own it sounds like a bad video game. If the screenwriters can come up with a great title on their own (and so far they haven't) then great. If they can't, there's plenty of Fleming left to choose from, and higher quality Fleming than the usual short story titles fans keep throwing around.


Edited by Revelator, 13 February 2013 - 06:17 PM.


#282 Professor Pi

Professor Pi

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1430 posts

Posted 14 February 2013 - 08:27 AM

The thing I always appreciate about Fleming titles is there's some twist to them or turn of phrase.  You think you know where it's going and then that last word turns it on its head--You Only Live ... Twice or Live and Let ...Die.  Or there's an implied question going against expectation--From Russia with Love? The Spy who Loved Me?  The World Is Not Enough!

 

Then there are the one word titles--how to describe a King Midas villain who has his fingers controlling everything--Goldfinger

Or a lightning rod--Thunderball!

 

His reputation for sexual innuendo forces one to pick up and read Octopussy just to find out what if he means something adulterous, only to find out it's a pet octopus!  Some titles have a dichotomy of professional and personal meanings for Bond--For Your Eyes Only and On Her Majesty's Secret Service.  So For Queen and Country might be good.

 

Doctor No, The Man with the Golden Gun, and Shatterhand are intriguing character names because you wonder why a doctor embodies the negative, or who makes a gun out of gold.  Hands hold so what is Dr. Guntram Shatterhand about, you wonder.

 

At best, the non-Fleming titles reflect mere shadows of these qualities--Skyfall or Die Another Day.  At worst, a typo could improve the title (*cough* TND *cough*)  That's why it's so much fun to try and guess a good Bond title. We appreciate Fleming's genius even more when failing to duplicate it.



#283 Stavro

Stavro

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 27 posts

Posted 14 February 2013 - 03:34 PM

The thing I always appreciate about Fleming titles is there's some twist to them or turn of phrase.  You think you know where it's going and then that last word turns it on its head--You Only Live ... Twice or Live and Let ...Die.  Or there's an implied question going against expectation--From Russia with Love? The Spy who Loved Me?  The World Is Not Enough!

 

Then there are the one word titles--how to describe a King Midas villain who has his fingers controlling everything--Goldfinger

Or a lightning rod--Thunderball!

 

His reputation for sexual innuendo forces one to pick up and read Octopussy just to find out what if he means something adulterous, only to find out it's a pet octopus!  Some titles have a dichotomy of professional and personal meanings for Bond--For Your Eyes Only and On Her Majesty's Secret Service.  So For Queen and Country might be good.

 

Doctor No, The Man with the Golden Gun, and Shatterhand are intriguing character names because you wonder why a doctor embodies the negative, or who makes a gun out of gold.  Hands hold so what is Dr. Guntram Shatterhand about, you wonder.

 

At best, the non-Fleming titles reflect mere shadows of these qualities--Skyfall or Die Another Day.  At worst, a typo could improve the title (*cough* TND *cough*)  That's why it's so much fun to try and guess a good Bond title. We appreciate Fleming's genius even more when failing to duplicate it.

This.

Except I disagree about Skyfall - the title is just as intriguing as Live and Let Die or You Only Live Twice. I mean, how could the sky fall? I know the metaphor has been used before throughout the history of literature, but I don't think it's as bad a title as you think, and it's absolutely better than Die Another Day.


Edited by Stavro, 14 February 2013 - 03:34 PM.


#284 FutureJamesBond

FutureJamesBond

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 126 posts
  • Location:Skyfall Manor

Posted 14 February 2013 - 08:48 PM

From Quantum with Solace?

 

Dr. Thunderball?

 

How about "The Spy Who Loved A View to a Kill?"



#285 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 14 February 2013 - 09:39 PM

 

Given how good Fleming was with titles, even his chapter titles have promise. And why should short story titles be privileged over them, when many  are certainly better than "007 in New York" or "Risico"?

 

I think you're missing the point. My point, at least, was that they shouldn't be picking around the floor for scraps of whatever's left over of Fleming's chapter titles and such at all. They need to get creative and stop clinging - even moreso I say to stop with the constant homaging, as if a new Bond film would fail without a bunch of nods and wanks to previous films.

At the end of the day they need to write an original story anyway, so just get on with it - get into the *spirit* of Fleming. Write it well and a good title will come *from* it, rather than desperately scrounging chapter titles and then trying to fit in a story that suits it.. you know what I mean?

 

I think you're missing mine in turn. The best way to get into the spirit of Fleming is to actually use him, not ape him. Fleming was a master at titles, and even the titles for his chapters tend to be better than anything the scriptwriters can come up with when being "creative" (Die Another Day or Tomorrow Never Dies anyone?). And in the case of Quantum of Solace the problem was that they didn't fit the story to suit the title, or at the very least didn't provide an adequate explanation for the relevance of the title. Skyfall succeeded as a title only because it referred back to a location of great importance to the film--on its own it sounds like a bad video game. If the screenwriters can come up with a great title on their own (and so far they haven't) then great. If they can't, there's plenty of Fleming left to choose from, and higher quality Fleming than the usual short story titles fans keep throwing around.

 

But that's just it - they *wouldn't* be 'using' Fleming material.. they'd just be scraping a chapter title from the bottom of the barrel and then *having *, like you just said yourself with QoS, to fit a story around that title, just for the sake of using whatever's left of a couple of words Fleming put together. It's incredibly amateur practice for a writer of any kind to do this, because they are instantly limiting their creativity.

If there were actual good stories to use along with a good title or two of course that'd be a good idea to use, but there simply aren't. There are a few rather dull scraps of narrative left amongst what's already been done, and the titles left are mediocre. I think Skyfall is a better title for a 007 movie than The Hildebrand Rarity, The Property of a Lady or 007 in New York. That isn't saying they are bad titles, they are good short story titles for very short, in fact rather poor examples of Fleming's work. Face it, you just want them to use them for the sake of it being Fleming, not because it would actually bring anything to the film. That IS amateur writing practice, and since Purvis & Wadehead are no more (THANK F) I would rather they concentrated on writing a good story first, then seeing what happens. If the story they write independently and fully creatively suits one of those titles and it works well I'd obviously not have a problem with it.



#286 Aquator

Aquator

    Recruit

  • Crew
  • 2 posts

Posted 14 February 2013 - 10:30 PM

The thing I always appreciate about Fleming titles is there's some twist to them or turn of phrase.  You think you know where it's going and then that last word turns it on its head--You Only Live ... Twice or Live and Let ...Die.  Or there's an implied question going against expectation--From Russia with Love? The Spy who Loved Me?  The World Is Not Enough!

 

Then there are the one word titles--how to describe a King Midas villain who has his fingers controlling everything--Goldfinger

Or a lightning rod--Thunderball!

 

His reputation for sexual innuendo forces one to pick up and read Octopussy just to find out what if he means something adulterous, only to find out it's a pet octopus!  

 

It might just be me, but I find Fleming's one word titles (apart from Risico) often have a whisper of sexual suggestiveness about them: Finger, Thunder, Ball, Pussy - OK, Moon and Raker might be pushing it a bit but I still reckon you can get some innuendo out of them.  ;)

 

So, with that in mind I definitely prefer the previously mentioned Silvertongue to titles like Brokenclaw and Shatterhand which seem a little less sensuous or passionate in comparison.

 

I'll admit I've whiled away many an idle hour trying to think of potential Bond titles myself. The only ones that seem half-decent probably would have to tie into very specific plots, but since we're discussing the subject here you go:

  • Foxfire
  • Silvertouch
  • Who Dares Lives
  • Time Kills Everything (yeah, I went with 'Kill' in a title *ducks for cover*  :P ) 


#287 007jamesbond

007jamesbond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1371 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:41 AM

like to "For Queen and Country" as a title since it has this Fleming feel and similar to OHMSS 



#288 Professor Pi

Professor Pi

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1430 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 07:05 AM

Stavro, Skyfall is a good title.  It also brings to mind "sky's the limit."

 

Aquator, it's not just you, Fleming's one word titles are suggestive.  Moonraker too, though I can't explain that one.

 

I hadn't heard Silvertongue before.  That'd be good, though there certainly are more than a couple colored body part titles.  But there was a Clint Eastwood movied called Firefox.

 

I' also liked Pussfeller's suggestion of The Sun Never Sets from another thread.  And I'm glad they opted for Licence to Kill over 'Revoked' or 'Renewed.'



#289 Aquator

Aquator

    Recruit

  • Crew
  • 2 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

Stavro, Skyfall is a good title.  It also brings to mind "sky's the limit."

 

Aquator, it's not just you, Fleming's one word titles are suggestive.  Moonraker too, though I can't explain that one.

 

I hadn't heard Silvertongue before.  That'd be good, though there certainly are more than a couple colored body part titles.  But there was a Clint Eastwood movied called Firefox.

 

I' also liked Pussfeller's suggestion of The Sun Never Sets from another thread.  And I'm glad they opted for Licence to Kill over 'Revoked' or 'Renewed.'

Yeah, I knew about Clint's film. Shame that, though I was hoping the fact the two words were switched around might be enough to distinguish it. For those that don't know Foxfire is actually a term for bio-luminescent fungi and was used as a light source in the earliest submarines.


Edited by Aquator, 15 February 2013 - 09:34 PM.


#290 Revelator

Revelator

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 15 February 2013 - 11:48 PM

But that's just it - they *wouldn't* be 'using' Fleming material.. they'd just be scraping a chapter title from the bottom of the barrel and then *having *, like you just said yourself with QoS, to fit a story around that title, just for the sake of using whatever's left of a couple of words Fleming put together. It's incredibly amateur practice for a writer of any kind to do this, because they are instantly limiting their creativity.

If there were actual good stories to use along with a good title or two of course that'd be a good idea to use, but there simply aren't. There are a few rather dull scraps of narrative left amongst what's already been done, and the titles left are mediocre. I think Skyfall is a better title for a 007 movie than The Hildebrand Rarity, The Property of a Lady or 007 in New York. That isn't saying they are bad titles, they are good short story titles for very short, in fact rather poor examples of Fleming's work. Face it, you just want them to use them for the sake of it being Fleming, not because it would actually bring anything to the film. That IS amateur writing practice, and since Purvis & Wadehead are no more (THANK F) I would rather they concentrated on writing a good story first, then seeing what happens. If the story they write independently and fully creatively suits one of those titles and it works well I'd obviously not have a problem with it.

 


I don't quite see why using one of Fleming's titles would not be using Fleming. With QoS they picked a title that themetaically applied to the film, but needed a slight bit of explanation to make that relevance clear. That--in the form of a few lines of dialogue--would not have been too much to ask from the shortest movie in the series. Skyfall is certainly a better title than 007 in New York, but that's the extent of my agreement (I certainly don't agree that The Hildebrand Rarity is a rather poor example of Fleming's work. On the other hand, its title is so specific that it's of very limited use.)

Until you can figure out the exact nature and extent of Haggis and Logan's contributions, I would suggest cutting back on the Purvis & Wade hate, especially since they gave you your beloved Skyfall title.

It is silly to claim "I would rather they concentrated on writing a good story first"--no one was suggesting otherwise. It's clear that the title is often selected after a draft of the script is completed, often quite late in the game, and sometimes by people other than the screenwriters (which is why I trust Fleming's ability more than the film crew's). I would like the filmmakers to use a Fleming title--preferably a chapter title rather than a short story title--if it fits the script or can be fitted without too much trouble. He was a master at titles, and still has some good ones left.


Edited by Revelator, 15 February 2013 - 11:49 PM.


#291 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 16 February 2013 - 12:47 AM

I'd like to see something that doesn't sound like it was thought up by either Titan Comics or someone haunting an online forum - and that includes myself.



#292 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 16 February 2013 - 02:07 AM

FOR KING & COUNTRY or FOR QUEEN & COUNTRY
 
VALLEY OF SHADOWS : A chapter title from LALD
 
GOLDEN DRAGON : A restaurant outside the Bottoms Up Club in TMWTGG. 
 
PISTOLS AT DAWN : A throwback to TMWTGG
 
S.P.E.C.T.R.E. 
 
NEW YORK OPERATIVE or OPERATION NEW YORK : Inspired by '007 In New York', can't wait for them to use the remaining Fleming titles. 
 
KISS KISS : A club Bond runs into in Thunderball 
 
FIREFIGHT 
 
LIFE OR DEATH
 
 
Added;
 
UNIVERSAL EXPORTS : Pussfuller suggestion 
 
DEATH FOR BREAKFAST : Fleming chapter title
 
SHOWCASE OF DEATH


#293 AMC Hornet

AMC Hornet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts

Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:10 AM

Wot I said.

 

EDIT: However, despite what I said, I suddenly feel inspired by Sebastian Faulks:

 

"Let the Devil Take Tomorrow"

 

Or some shortened version thereof.