Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

John Gardner 30th Anniversary Editions


311 replies to this topic

Poll: Gardner reprints?

Would you like to see John Gardner 30th Anniversary reprints in 2011?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 16 April 2010 - 06:41 PM

Okay, dang-it, enough is enough. I say it's time to reprint the Gardner Bond novels, and what better time to do than next year for the 30th Anniversary of License Renewed. Call them "The 30th Anniversary Editions" -- a reprinting of the entire series with new uniform cover art and, yes, Role of Honour will be a "restored edition" containing the original excised chapter with Bond and the villain dueling via computer game. With nothing happening on the continunation novel front, this would be a great time to bring back Gardner, and a beautiful thing. Now I don't want to hear any guff from you only-Fleming jags-offs. Because in 2011...

John Gardner LIVES!

Posted Image

#2 Trident

Trident

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2658 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 16 April 2010 - 07:02 PM

God, is it 30 years already??? To think that a child born that year could already be a parent, grandparent even, is a little disturbing.

While I could not promise to buy them myself, I understand the collector's reasons for wanting a new edition with uniform cover art. The Gardners on my own shelf are an unlikely assortment of different editions, covers, sizes. A package wrapping up the entire run in a single style would be welcome.

Apart from that I seem to remember ROH containing a computer game battle between Bond and Holy, in a version of a real-time strategy game (Command&Conquer-like?). Am I wrong?

#3 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 16 April 2010 - 07:09 PM

Apart from that I seem to remember ROH containing a computer game battle between Bond and Holy, in a version of a real-time strategy game (Command&Conquer-like?). Am I wrong?

That was role-playing game -- The Battle of Bunker Hill -- and it replaced the original computer game chapter. Gardner wrote an elaborate computer game between Bond and the villain which he felt was his modern equivalent to the Goldfinger golf match and was key to the book. But they asked him to cut and replace it because of the computer game in NSNA, which turned out to be nothing like it.

These would not only be for collectors, but for normal people and fans that just want to read them. Some of them have been out-of-print for over 20 years. It's nuts.

#4 Trident

Trident

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2658 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 16 April 2010 - 07:43 PM

Ah sorry, I always forget that most Gardners are incredibly hard to come by these days. Didn't know about that particular change because of NSNA; seems a shame.

#5 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 16 April 2010 - 07:51 PM

It would also be nice to decide on a single title for COLD -- COLD or Cold Fall. I say go with whatever Gardner intended (probably COLD) and also investigate JG's intent on whether the two sections ("books") should include the years in which they're set. They are dated in the US edition, but not the UK.

In fact, there are MANY bizarre editorial changes between the US and UK editions. It's almost as bad as Fleming. As they did with Fleming, let's get a definitive, international set that reflects the author's true work. Just another reason I feel like we need a new printing.

#6 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 16 April 2010 - 07:56 PM

30 Years! Where do we sign the petition for them to be re-printed? Love the photo of JC at the PC. That would have been a modern contraption back in the day with the ZX Spectrum to follow. (I loved those rubber keys)

Somthing that can be easlily forgotten is so many of you 80s Kids came to John Gardners Bond before Fleming. Fellow CBn Memebers Craig Arthur, Zencat and Jim all read Gardners books first. (appoligies if that's wrong) Countless others must have had the same love affair with Gardners Bond in the 80's.

Come on IFP, now's the time. It's way over due!

#7 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:03 PM

I think I might have read OHMSS first. But I could be wrong about that. License Renewed could very well have been my very first Bond novel. I know I dug it!

BTW, it's very possible IFP could see this thread. Maybe I will even forward the link. Not to be a pest, but I really think this is good idea. It wouldn't hurt if they saw there was a lot of fan support. B)

#8 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:13 PM

Great idea; need these back in the public eye. Woefully underappreciated.

#9 Trident

Trident

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2658 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:18 PM

Oh, would seem I'm the senior here. Or is that 'best ager' now? Anyway, you get it, the old geezer. I've read all Flemings first, so Gardner has had a harder time with me (although I was quite freaked-out about the first three). Oh, and Gardner came before Amis for me, or rather 'Markham', as his book wasn't very widely known and his real identity much less even.

Great idea; need these back in the public eye. Woefully underappreciated.


You really started with Gardner??? Well, I never!

#10 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:33 PM

I think we need a few more on board here first to get the fire started.

Then if anyone is on first name terms with Fergus Fleming they could pass this on......anyone?

#11 Bill

Bill

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 257 posts
  • Location:Levittown, New York

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:44 PM

I'm all for it, especially if there previously unpublished material!

I've said it before, but John Gardner's contribution to the Bond canon should not be underestimated. He did more to make Bond viable in both the tense days as the Cold War ended and then even in the post Cold War era. That, along with the fact that his adventures were (aside from the occasional comic book from Eclipse and Dark Horse) the only new Bond material for six whole years, make him a true hero for Bond fans everywhere.

Edited by Bill, 16 April 2010 - 08:45 PM.


#12 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:50 PM

That's an excellent point, Bill. He did sustain us during that dark time.

#13 Single-O-Seven

Single-O-Seven

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1323 posts
  • Location:Toronto, ON, Canada

Posted 16 April 2010 - 08:51 PM

I'm all for this. Like all the new Fleming sets that get released, I'd buy this whole set (in one go if it's made available that way). My complete Gardner collection right now is a jumble of various editions, some new off the shelf, some used (the harder to find ones). In any case, I've read them all, and loved a great number of them. Yes - bring them back!!!

#14 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 17 April 2010 - 05:26 AM

Love, love, love this idea.

He kept the literary Bond going for 15 years... a little celebration is in order.

#15 Righty007

Righty007

    Discharged.

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13051 posts
  • Location:Station CLE - Cleveland

Posted 17 April 2010 - 05:52 AM

Fantastic idea for a thread. B) :tdown:

While the U.S. first editions have a uniform design and look lovely on my shelf, I would certainly buy a new set of Gardner's Bond novels!

Seeing new Gardner editions with cover designs featuring a vintage '80s look would send shivers down my spine.

Anybody notice my For Special Services inspired signature?

#16 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 08:09 AM

Now shall we sign the petition in our screen names or real names? ohh eer!

I have not read all the Gardners, is the Saab a feature through out his Novels?

#17 zerominus

zerominus

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 88 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 08:17 AM

A set of stylish hardbacks with dustjackets would be much more appealing than paperbacks, does anyone else concur? Particularly as some of the hardbacks are near impossible to find.

#18 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 08:22 AM

A set of stylish hardbacks with dustjackets would be much more appealing than paperbacks, does anyone else concur? Particularly as some of the hardbacks are near impossible to find.


If I had to choose I would like Hardbacks, but thats just a collectors thing. I think Paperbacks would reach more readers, which is most important, so would have to say Paperbacks. I never knew John Gardner wrote Bond Novels until I joined the forums here. There must be plenty others like that. Readers are missing out. Look at the way Devil May Care sold! Yes it had a massive marketing campaign behind it, but still lets look at how many people wanted to read a Bond book.

#19 MarkA

MarkA

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 697 posts
  • Location:South East, England

Posted 17 April 2010 - 09:02 AM

Right I am going to be the party pooper, and this is from someone who has a complete collection of UK Gardner first editions. I was really excited by the idea of the books when they first launched in 1981, but after only about three books I realised they were pretty terrible. That’s the reason why sales dropped off alarmingly. Surely Zencat do you really need another set of books cluttering up your shelves, of which you most probably have countless editions of just to satisfy your collectors mania. All they will do is collect dust. Mine do.

#20 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 09:19 AM

Right I am going to be the party pooper, and this is from someone who has a complete collection of UK Gardner first editions. I was really excited by the idea of the books when they first launched in 1981, but after only about three books I realized they were pretty terrible. That’s the reason why sales dropped off alarmingly. Surely Zencat do you really need another set of books cluttering up your shelves, of which you most probably have countless editions of just to satisfy your collectors mania. All they will do is collect dust. Mine do.


For me, per-say, as I don't have the complete collection I would like to see them re-printed and given a chance to read them all and draw my own conclusions. I dont think this is as much about the collectors. For me it's more about reaching the people that have not read them or didn't even know that there were more Bond books written. The one's that I do own have been sourced from book fairs. So I would bite an arm off to be able to get brand new paperbacks. Get the Penguin logo dusted off. B)

#21 MarkA

MarkA

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 697 posts
  • Location:South East, England

Posted 17 April 2010 - 09:29 AM

For me, per-say, as I don't have the complete collection I would like to see them re-printed and given a chance to read them all and draw my own conclusions. I dont think this is as much about the collectors. For me it's more about reaching the people that have not read them or didn't even know that there were more Bond books written. The one's that I do own have been sourced from book fairs. So I would bite an arm off to be able to get brand new paperbacks. Get the Penguin logo dusted off.

The trouble is would they be a viable commercial proposition. They really didn't sell that great towards the end.

#22 Righty007

Righty007

    Discharged.

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13051 posts
  • Location:Station CLE - Cleveland

Posted 17 April 2010 - 09:35 AM

Look what I've found: http://twitter.com/GardnerRenewed

#23 DAN LIGHTER

DAN LIGHTER

    Lt. Commander

  • Enlisting
  • PipPipPip
  • 1248 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

For me, per-say, as I don't have the complete collection I would like to see them re-printed and given a chance to read them all and draw my own conclusions. I dont think this is as much about the collectors. For me it's more about reaching the people that have not read them or didn't even know that there were more Bond books written. The one's that I do own have been sourced from book fairs. So I would bite an arm off to be able to get brand new paperbacks. Get the Penguin logo dusted off.

The trouble is would they be a viable commercial proposition. They really didn't sell that great towards the end.


As there is no market research we can only second guess. This thread will be the nearest we can come to it.

#24 David Schofield

David Schofield

    Commander

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3026 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 02:34 PM

Gardner IS underappreciated. Particularly when one condsiders what came after. I include not just Benson and Faulks in that, but Weinberg and Higson also.

I have the Sunday Times launch article from 1981. Gardner was my first "I was there" lit. Bond (excluding Wood's Moonraker). I was 16 in 1981.

But a "tribute" re-issue? No thanks.

Tributes are for Fleming only. Sorry if that doesn't fit with the theme of this thread.

Non-Flemings are just thrillers using the name James Bond for the lead character.

#25 MarkA

MarkA

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 697 posts
  • Location:South East, England

Posted 17 April 2010 - 02:40 PM

Gardner IS underappreciated. Particularly when one condsiders what came after. I include not just Benson and Faulks in that, but Weinberg and Higson also.

The thing is though I think Benson really was rubbish and a terrible writer unlike Gardner who could write no doubt, I really like Higson and especially Weinberg whose Moneypenny Diaries are grossly under appreciated.

#26 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 17 April 2010 - 02:43 PM

Look what I've found: http://twitter.com/GardnerRenewed

B)

#27 David Schofield

David Schofield

    Commander

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3026 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 02:53 PM

Gardner IS underappreciated. Particularly when one condsiders what came after. I include not just Benson and Faulks in that, but Weinberg and Higson also.

The thing is though I think Benson really was rubbish and a terrible writer unlike Gardner who could write no doubt, I really like Higson and especially Weinberg whose Moneypenny Diaries are grossly under appreciated.


Agreed, Benson was B)e. Garder could indeed write, though he wasn't really fully intune with Fleming-Bond. But who was in the 80s until Mr Dalton came along?

Always been pissed off by Weinberg, though she DOES write well: she dosn't know her Fleming and Moneypenny averting WW3 by stopping the Cuban Missile Crisis? Come on...!!! Higson writes about Super Boy.

#28 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 17 April 2010 - 03:02 PM

Hey guys, let try and stay on topic about Gardner and this 30th anniversary idea. We have many, many other threads about the strength and weaknesses of the other continuation authors and books, and it's always an interesting conversation worth having, but I really want this thread to stay focused on JG and his books. Thanks. B)

#29 David Schofield

David Schofield

    Commander

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3026 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 03:09 PM

Hey guys, let try and stay on topic about Gardner and this 30th anniversary idea. We have many, many other threads about the strength and weaknesses of the other continuation authors and books, and it's always an interesting conversation worth having, but I really want this thread to stay focused on JG and his books. Thanks. B)


Okay, Zen.

I repeat, Gardner was by far the best of the post 1981 continuation novelists.

Does he deserve a uniform tribute reprint (regardless of the economics)? No. The content 'aint gonna change.

#30 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 17 April 2010 - 03:12 PM

Noted.

Hey, maybe we should attach a poll to this thread? But let's make it a simple yes or no (get too cute with too many choices and you never really get a clear result). "Would you like to see John Gardner 30th Anniversary reprints in 2011?" Can one of the mods do this for me? Thanks.