Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

EoN-VS-FRWL


1 reply to this topic

#1 Gothamite

Gothamite

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 409 posts
  • Location:Dublin, Ireland

Posted 22 January 2009 - 02:31 PM

Everything or Nothing

Pros:

- Bigger spectacle, more larger than life.
- Better selection of weapons and gadgets.
- Better vehicle levels.
- Excellent, movie-esque music. (A goddamn videogame has a better score than GoldenEye)
- OTT Action ("Death of an Agent: Leap of Faith" is so much fun)
- More interactivity (A level can be stealthy and sleek or an action-packed shoot-out)
- Creative and effective use of OTT gadgets (the Q Spider works well and is fun to use. The invisibility suit is fiddly and troublesome, but is that not the point?)
- An original story means that fans are less likely to be offended.
- John Cleese's best performance as Q. (Makes you wish that he'd been given at least one more opportunity to play him, before they started the Craig films)

Cons:

- The most ridiculous and most outlandishly futuristic plot in which has James Bond has ever found himself. (The energy crisis has been solved. Hook up a generator to Ian Fleming's grave based on this game and we'll have enough power to bring us into the middle of the next millenium.:))
- Brosnan's voiceover is weird and he sounds Italian-American in a lot of scenes.
- The Brosnan skin looks a bit strange from the back; his hair can look like a helmet in poorly lit scenes and when wearing the covert suit, his :( looks huge. :)
- Weird, forced, unnecessary attempts at continuity (Jaws is fine, but Max Zorin?!)
- A disappointingly long ending.
- Shannen Elizabeth
- Judi Dench's worst performance as M.


From Russia with Love


Pros:

- A more functional aiming system.
- Fun customability (could have used some tweaking, though)
- The Connery skin was better than the Brosnan skin.
- Arguably better graphics.
- Obviously a great plot, with a new ending that's a lot of fun.

Cons:

- A terrible choice of film to adapt. FRWL was far too subtle and low-key (which was why it works so well as a film) for a videogame. GF, TB or YOLT would have been much, much better. The train battle and Bond's first encounter with Tatiana are both butchered by the game.
- Awfully repetitive vehicle levels.
- Embarassingly awkward voiceovers (Connery does his best, but it just doesn't seem realistic when a young, healthy-looking James Bond has the gruff, smoky-voice of a man in his late seventies)
- OCTOPUS
- The lack of Blofeld (how come they were able to have him in GoldenEye: Rogue Agent and not in this?!)
- A lack of interactivity, practically no stealth.
- Poor controls.
- OTT gadgets that don't work at all in a game set in 1963 (Q Copters?! Magic serum guns that temporarily turn baddies into goodies?! And of course, the stereotypical laser watch...)

Edited by Gothamite, 22 January 2009 - 02:34 PM.


#2 HH007

HH007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1833 posts
  • Location:U.S.A.

Posted 22 January 2009 - 03:38 PM

Everything or Nothing

Pros:

- Bigger spectacle, more larger than life.
- Better selection of weapons and gadgets.
- Better vehicle levels.
- Excellent, movie-esque music. (A goddamn videogame has a better score than GoldenEye)
- OTT Action ("Death of an Agent: Leap of Faith" is so much fun)
- More interactivity (A level can be stealthy and sleek or an action-packed shoot-out)
- Creative and effective use of OTT gadgets (the Q Spider works well and is fun to use. The invisibility suit is fiddly and troublesome, but is that not the point?)
- An original story means that fans are less likely to be offended.
- John Cleese's best performance as Q. (Makes you wish that he'd been given at least one more opportunity to play him, before they started the Craig films)

Cons:

- The most ridiculous and most outlandishly futuristic plot in which has James Bond has ever found himself. (The energy crisis has been solved. Hook up a generator to Ian Fleming's grave based on this game and we'll have enough power to bring us into the middle of the next millenium.:))
- Brosnan's voiceover is weird and he sounds Italian-American in a lot of scenes.
- The Brosnan skin looks a bit strange from the back; his hair can look like a helmet in poorly lit scenes and when wearing the covert suit, his :( looks huge. :)
- Weird, forced, unnecessary attempts at continuity (Jaws is fine, but Max Zorin?!)
- A disappointingly long ending.
- Shannen Elizabeth
- Judi Dench's worst performance as M.


From Russia with Love


Pros:

- A more functional aiming system.
- Fun customability (could have used some tweaking, though)
- The Connery skin was better than the Brosnan skin.
- Arguably better graphics.
- Obviously a great plot, with a new ending that's a lot of fun.

Cons:

- A terrible choice of film to adapt. FRWL was far too subtle and low-key (which was why it works so well as a film) for a videogame. GF, TB or YOLT would have been much, much better. The train battle and Bond's first encounter with Tatiana are both butchered by the game.
- Awfully repetitive vehicle levels.
- Embarassingly awkward voiceovers (Connery does his best, but it just doesn't seem realistic when a young, healthy-looking James Bond has the gruff, smoky-voice of a man in his late seventies)
- OCTOPUS
- The lack of Blofeld (how come they were able to have him in GoldenEye: Rogue Agent and not in this?!)
- A lack of interactivity, practically no stealth.
- Poor controls.
- OTT gadgets that don't work at all in a game set in 1963 (Q Copters?! Magic serum guns that temporarily turn baddies into goodies?! And of course, the stereotypical laser watch...)


I agree with every point you make. I would also include as a con the pointless addition of Maria Menounos to the cast of FRWL.