About the title
#1
Posted 06 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
#2
Posted 06 July 2008 - 09:34 PM
http://www.thefreedi.../devil-may-care
http://idioms.thefre.../devil-may-care
It suits Bond well in a way, IMO, and I like it as a title.
But I stil haven't read DMC for the moment, except some extracts, so I'm not sure how it fits with the story.
#3
Posted 06 July 2008 - 09:35 PM
EDIT: I know that it's an idiom but I don't know how it relates to the novel.
Edited by Righty007, 06 July 2008 - 09:36 PM.
#4
Posted 07 July 2008 - 12:11 AM
#5
Posted 07 July 2008 - 12:24 AM
I'd love to know how the title came about.
As would I. It's a great title, but I didn't come across anything in the novel that really seemed to tie into it in any way.
#6
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:02 AM
#7
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:33 AM
Is the title even mentioned in the novel? I may have missed it, but I doubt it.
I don't believe that it is. I may be mistaken as well, but I certainly don't recall anything related to the title in the novel.
#8
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:34 AM
#9
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:12 PM
#10
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:16 PM
It's not mentioned in the novel. My guess is that it was meant to be a title that said 'Bond is back: larger than life, the old devil-may-care hero of Fleming's original novels.' It's an idiomatic expression, but it is also rather an old-fashioned one, and brings to mind (for me anyway) British thrillers of the 30s-50s. The only way they tried to reference it more directly was on the front flyleaf, where there's something in the blurb about Bond battling a man who would dance with the devil himself.
Wasn't it somehow in the novel? Not the full expression, but some version of it?
I like the title, but I wish they had somehow twisted it like Fleming used to do.
#11
Posted 06 February 2009 - 12:33 AM
#12
Posted 06 February 2009 - 01:34 AM
Wasn't it somehow in the novel? Not the full expression, but some version of it?
I seem to recall it popping up at least once or twice in the narrative, perhaps as a commentary on certain characters, but I'm sure I wouldn't be able to find the references now. If memory serves, they were rather casual, throwaway lines. There's certainly no effort made to expound on the title's significance or its connection to the novel's themes. It has a certain ring to it, but I would have rather seen a more meaningful selection.
#13
Posted 11 April 2009 - 06:35 PM