Daniel Craig GQ Man of the year
#1
Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:37 AM
http://men.style.com...id=content_6200
#2
Posted 21 November 2007 - 04:50 PM
Named the GQ Man of the Year
#3
Posted 21 November 2007 - 04:57 PM
#4
Posted 21 November 2007 - 04:59 PM
Nice. I'm glad to see it, it seems that he had been overlooked in many US publications where he seems to make the cover of every UK magazine.
Seems that way at times. I'll have to be on the lookout for this issue this week.
#5
Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:02 PM
#6
Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:05 PM
#7
Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:21 PM
#8
Posted 21 November 2007 - 09:05 PM
#9
Posted 21 November 2007 - 09:06 PM
#10
Posted 21 November 2007 - 09:08 PM
Nice. I'm glad to see it, it seems that he had been overlooked in many US publications where he seems to make the cover of every UK magazine.
Seems that way at times. I'll have to be on the lookout for this issue this week.
Keep in mind that there are three different covers, one with Bill Clinton, one with Kanye West, and one with Daniel Craig!
#11
Posted 21 November 2007 - 09:16 PM
There's always next year!
#12
Posted 21 November 2007 - 09:55 PM
but I will.
#13
Posted 22 November 2007 - 12:36 AM
Sorry, ol' chap!So much for my bid for the title.
There's always next year!
Crap - now I have to venture into a mall & deal with insane Christmas shoppers to pick this magazine up.
#14
Posted 22 November 2007 - 01:09 AM
However, I always thought he'd found the whole thing difficult (and that includes after the success of Casino Royale).
#15
Posted 22 November 2007 - 02:53 AM
IS this US GQ or something? I have the UK one December where he's on the cover but the interview's different.
A completely different interview, markt?
#16
Posted 22 November 2007 - 03:28 AM
I think Lazenby and Moore are the only Bond actors who have never graced a GQ cover. Lazenby I can understand, but Moore would seem like a natural. I guess they were trying to stay away from the Bond image in the '70s and early '80s. Then again, the guy is timeless so it may not be too late.
#17
Posted 22 November 2007 - 07:47 AM
He describes playing Bond as difficult and challenging. This is much more like the kind of comment I was expecting from Craig by now, rather than signing up to do 5 more or whatever. I am glad he has signed up to do more, though.
However, I always thought he'd found the whole thing difficult (and that includes after the success of Casino Royale).
Is there a chance, you could scan this interview? ...or write it down?
#18
Posted 25 November 2007 - 04:25 PM
#19
Posted 25 November 2007 - 04:55 PM
IS this US GQ or something? I have the UK one December where he's on the cover but the interview's different.
A completely different interview, markt?
Yes; as far as I can tell from the extract. They're certainly by different writers, so I'd imagine they're altogether different. Odd really, you'd have thought they could franchise these interviews as they're for the same mag, essentially.
#20
Posted 25 November 2007 - 11:08 PM
Odd really, you'd have thought they could franchise these interviews as they're for the same mag, essentially.
That was my original assumption too.
Still trying to locate this new issue. Most of the bookstores I've visited still have the old one out.
#21
Posted 06 December 2007 - 09:38 PM
Figure he'll be on the over next year when Bond 22 hits the theaters. He'll possibly be named "The Sexiest Man Alive" for next year's People Magazine.
#22
Posted 07 December 2007 - 01:41 AM
I did that today and noticed something interesting -- if you look at the Craig cover, it looks like they've done some airbrushing on his face. Either that or he's been doing Botox.
#23
Posted 09 December 2007 - 11:00 PM
I did that today and noticed something interesting -- if you look at the Craig cover, it looks like they've done some airbrushing on his face. Either that or he's been doing Botox.
My God, an actor appearing on the cover of a major magazine was airbrushed????!! What a scandalous controversy that will rip apart the very fabric of existence. Up next in other shocking news - water is still wet.
#24
Posted 13 December 2007 - 01:18 AM
One thing I found interesting is something the interviewer said that part of the reason that CR was so well received was that Bond was played as being an 'every man'. Not an upper class arriostocrat. Therefore making him easier for the audiences to identify with and root for. Something which I completely agree with. With Lazenby, Dalton, Moore and Brosnan they all came across as 'to the manner born'. Connery was a sleazy reptile who came across as something conjured up by Hugh Hefner. Craig's Bond was the only Bond who came across as down to earth real and authenic.
Also I think DC trolls the Bond boards, because he mentioned that the web sites are calling the next film 'Bond 22'.
Hello Daniel!
#26
Posted 22 December 2007 - 01:28 AM
Don't the producers also call each new film Bond 22 or whatever before the come up with the title?One thing I found interesting is something the interviewer said that part of the reason that CR was so well received was that Bond was played as being an 'every man'. Not an upper class arriostocrat. Therefore making him easier for the audiences to identify with and root for. Something which I completely agree with. With Lazenby, Dalton, Moore and Brosnan they all came across as 'to the manner born'. Connery was a sleazy reptile who came across as something conjured up by Hugh Hefner. Craig's Bond was the only Bond who came across as down to earth real and authenic.
Also I think DC trolls the Bond boards, because he mentioned that the web sites are calling the next film 'Bond 22'.
Hello Daniel!
I don't think of Dalton as a "to the manor born" type. He seems more like the book Bond, the alienated type who doesn't quite fit in, kind of like his portrayal of Bond in many ways. Lazenby either. He is the closest to Craig I think in being down to earth and authentic.
#27
Posted 25 December 2007 - 03:53 PM
The other Bond's remind me of rich/upperclass boys, Or as one journalist put it 'Old Etonian's". That being English public (that's private school for those of you outside of the UK)school graduates with an air of entitlement. Who were probably tapped for the service via university sort of like the Cambridge five or the way the CIA tapped many of their spies from the Skull and Bones via Yale.
Connery came across as a bit of less rich snot type. But the other four Brosnan, Moore, Dalton and Lazenby yes.