Moonraker for Bond 23
#31
Posted 17 February 2007 - 08:33 PM
#32
Posted 24 February 2007 - 06:20 PM
Rereading this thread I'm slowing being converted to adapting the novels. This could be cool.
Gala, how do you think an Arab Drax would go over in the ME? Like a Led Zeppelin I expect.
#33
Posted 24 February 2007 - 06:50 PM
The same would happen in the Middle East. Dubai would jump for joy, publish news articles, and probably create a "Bond weekend package" at both the Ritz and Burj Al Arab alike in an attempt to get more tourists. More Casinos open, and everything. If you browse through the news here and editorials and all, many are under the impression that what Dubai really needs is "One Big Bad Guy" as a mascot or something... it's so true, there are soooo many "cliques of crime" as I like to call them and having a big baddie would probably help out a whole load of "underground" things here. So I think that an Arab Drax would be good for Dubai in general.
But for the Middle East as a whole? Shall bet here and now that in at least five Middle Eastern countries the movie shall be banned. However, shall also bet that three others will WANT to have the next Bond movie in their country after Moonraker was in the UAE. Very controversial this place is!
#34
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:28 PM
#35
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:38 PM
The novel, not the movie. Or at least I very much hope we are!
#36
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:48 PM
There is Moonraker and there is Moonraker... we're talking about the former.
The novel, not the movie. Or at least I very much hope we are!
And I'm all for the former--which was never filmed.
#37
Posted 22 March 2007 - 03:00 PM
There is Moonraker and there is Moonraker... we're talking about the former.
The novel, not the movie. Or at least I very much hope we are!
And I'm all for the former--which was never filmed.
#38
Posted 22 March 2007 - 03:00 PM
I would like to see a faithful adaptation of the novel some day, though I agree with earlier posts that doing it now would be slightly shaky ground because we did get essentially adaptations of Moonraker (quite loose adaptations, though closer to the source than the MR film) in '95 and '02.
#39
Posted 25 March 2007 - 04:34 PM
#40
Posted 25 March 2007 - 05:55 PM
#41
Posted 26 March 2007 - 12:03 AM
Daniel Craig saves England from a mad "Arab" Drax, and forever silencing all the naysayers for good.
#42
Posted 26 March 2007 - 06:09 AM
#43
Posted 26 March 2007 - 06:55 AM
One thing I have never understood about the novel, "MOONRAKER" . . . why was Bond given that particular assignment and not an MI-5 agent?
Doh!
Or maybe it was because a foreign power was involved. I'm really gonna have to read that book.
#44
Posted 26 March 2007 - 01:22 PM
I'm actually reading this right now...the hard thing to think about when considering adapting MR is what to make the enemy's ideology. Nazism was only defeated for 10 years back then; nobody takes a Nazi threat seriously today (right?). The only threat taken seriously today is (predominantly) radical Islamic terrorism (And that not enough by everyone, but that's another issue).
Men with buzzed hair and differently styled moustaches was eerie then...there'd need to be that kind of eerie idiosynchrasy for today's time. I wonder if an interesting story would include brainwashed Europeans & Americans behind the terrorism (just so it's not obvious because of ethnicities, and because this has already happened occasionally). Interesting, eerie stuff to brainstorm about.
#45
Posted 13 May 2007 - 04:11 AM
#46
Posted 13 May 2007 - 04:34 AM
#47
Posted 16 May 2007 - 09:24 AM
It could easily be adapted and there are many great moments in the novel; bridge game with Drax at Blades, car-chase, blowtorch torture and just plainly the characters of Hugo Drax, Willy Krebs and Gala Brand.I think the nuclear rocket angle could still be used. Nowadays there's much military interest in developing missiles with the ability to intercept incoming enemy rockets, obliterating them in flight before they reach their intended targets. Perhaps our Drax character could claim to have built just such an intercepting missile, and a test of it is planned. However, instead of launching it to intercept and destroy another missile during this test, Drax has topped it with a nuclear warhead, and set it on a path for London, or wherever the filmmakers feel would be a suitable target. Thus, much of the original novel could be maintained, though suitably updated.
#48
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:19 AM
Bond wouldn't work in the remake genre - not within the Eon ownership.
#49
Posted 16 May 2007 - 11:22 AM
Hasn't MOONRAKER been filmed already?
Not the way it should have been done, no!
I know that we disagree on this issue, and my posts for Live and Let Die as Bond 22 and Diamonds are Forever as Bond 24. I do agree with you that this is not the way that Eon will go, I just wish they would.
#50
Posted 16 May 2007 - 11:37 AM
Hasn't MOONRAKER been filmed already?
Not the way it should have been done, no!
"Should have been done"...? Isn't that up to the Broccolis - who paid money for the rights to the books and are sort of allowed to do exactly what they want with them. Us fans can debate it by all means, but let's leave the film-makers and their choices to the job in hand.
I'm also not so certain that space and satellites are exactly the way forward for Bond - in light of Brosnan's latter excesses and Eon's decision to leave that 1970's world-view behind.
#51
Posted 16 May 2007 - 11:55 PM
One thing I have never understood about the novel, "MOONRAKER" . . . why was Bond given that particular assignment and not an MI-5 agent?
Doh!
Or maybe it was because a foreign power was involved. I'm really gonna have to read that book.
Foreign power or not, the assignment (or story) occurred on British soil.
I would rather EON Productions release a new story than remake any previous titles - MOONRAKER included. And I rather liked the 1979 movie, despite the space-age atmosphere of its last 30 minutes.
Edited by LadySylvia, 16 May 2007 - 11:57 PM.
#52
Posted 17 May 2007 - 05:26 AM
One thing I have never understood about the novel, "MOONRAKER" . . . why was Bond given that particular assignment and not an MI-5 agent?
Doh!
Or maybe it was because a foreign power was involved. I'm really gonna have to read that book.
Foreign power or not, the assignment (or story) occurred on British soil.
I would rather EON Productions release a new story than remake any previous titles - MOONRAKER included. And I rather liked the 1979 movie, despite the space-age atmosphere of its last 30 minutes.
Um, thought I cleared this one up about a month and a half ago. Well, just in case it slipped in under the radar, so to speak, I'll repeat myself. This is why MI6 took the job instead of MI5:
MI5 had first "pick," so to speak, but since it was MI6 who did the (failed) background checks on all of Drax' Germans before they came over, MI5 told MI6 to take it. Thus, M gave it to Bond. MI5 just didn't want it. Hope that helps, LadySylvia.
I'm actually reading this right now...the hard thing to think about when considering adapting MR is what to make the enemy's ideology. Nazism was only defeated for 10 years back then; nobody takes a Nazi threat seriously today (right?). The only threat taken seriously today is (predominantly) radical Islamic terrorism (And that not enough by everyone, but that's another issue).
Men with buzzed hair and differently styled moustaches was eerie then...there'd need to be that kind of eerie idiosynchrasy for today's time. I wonder if an interesting story would include brainwashed Europeans & Americans behind the terrorism (just so it's not obvious because of ethnicities, and because this has already happened occasionally). Interesting, eerie stuff to brainstorm about.
It may not happen as soon as Bond 23, but it would be a crime to neglect this story, and to leave only the distant adaptations (GE & DAD) as the definitive ones.