Find the Benson page...
#1
Posted 05 February 2002 - 09:50 PM
I've had a flick through them but can't find it anywhere. My memory says it is on a left-hand page (hence my search got cut down by 50%) :-)
But if someone has got a better memory than me and can point me to the right spot? It'd be much appreciated.
Cheers,
J
#2
Posted 06 February 2002 - 11:32 PM
#3
Posted 07 February 2002 - 12:03 AM
Evil Doctor Cheese (06 Feb, 2002 11:32 p.m.):
Oh those 4am morality conversations in the taxi home!
Who said anything about taxi's? :-)
You were right about the 4am thing though mate.
#4
Posted 05 February 2002 - 11:19 PM
On my US edition, it starts at page 99. Just after he meets up with Latif Reggab. It's chapter 10, On The Run. Hope that helps.
#5
Posted 06 February 2002 - 12:41 AM
On the UK first edition paperback it's page 108 - I was right about it being on a left hand page though :-) (wow, 50/50 shot! LOL).
#6
Posted 06 February 2002 - 03:31 AM
Sounds very interesting.
#7
Posted 06 February 2002 - 01:04 PM
...if we could shrink the world's population down to a village of precisely one hundred people, with all the existing human ratios remaining the same, the results are quite extraordinary.
There would be 57 Asians and 21 Europeans. There would be only 14 people from the entire Western Hemisphere, north north and south. There would be 8 Africans. Of these 100 people, 52 would be female, 48 male. 70 would be non-whit, 30 white.70 would be non-Christian, 30 Christian. 89 would be heterosexual, 11 homosexual. 59% of the village's wealth would be in the hands of only 6 people, and all six would be Americans. 80 people would live in sub-standard housing. 70 would be unable to read. 50 would suffer from malnutrition. One would be near death, one would be near birth. Only one person would have a college education and only one would own a computer.
"When one considers our world from such a condensed perspective, the need for both acceptance and understanding becomes glaringly apparent."
#8
Posted 07 February 2002 - 02:19 AM
Condensing a macrocosm to a microcosm certainly highlights the world's eco/social boundaries, while expanding a microcosm to a macrocosm dilutes them, thus making them harder to see, and therefore accept, if one wishes to.
#9
Posted 06 February 2002 - 09:47 PM
#10
Posted 06 February 2002 - 09:51 PM
James Page (06 Feb, 2002 01:04 p.m.):
"When one considers our world from such a condensed perspective, the need for both acceptance and understanding becomes glaringly apparent."
Amen.
#11
Posted 06 February 2002 - 11:26 PM
This one is up in my armoury of arguments against the racist element that still exists in Britain :-( and you run into in the least suspecting places - like people you've known for years who get talking after a few notches of burbon in the early hours.