Anyone else long for a true OHMSS sequel?
#1
Posted 03 November 2006 - 07:36 PM
I guess you could say DAF kind of followed on, with Bond hunting Blowfeld down in the pre-title sequence, while others will say it ignored OHMSS altogether, and took place after YOLT (Bond being in Japan).
From what I'm told, OHMSS was ignored for a long time, but somewhere along the line it picked up a cult following, so the films started to acknowledge the evens of the film. Though I think you will all agree, the pre-titles of FYEO was simply not good enough (but what choice did Eon have, they lost the rights to Blowfeld).
Look at this fan art by Gobi, superb stuff, I would give my right testicle to see this film made.
http://img164.images...ngafterb7gp.jpg
I understand McClory now has the rights to Blowfeld, though what about when he passes away?
Anyway, it's all just wishful thinking, and perhaps the series has moved on since then, but the thought of a true follow up to OHMSS is something I often think about.
#2
Posted 03 November 2006 - 09:55 PM
#3
Posted 04 November 2006 - 10:49 AM
#4
Posted 05 November 2006 - 05:36 PM
So...
#5
Posted 05 November 2006 - 05:42 PM
For what it's worth, I think we'll be getting a sort-of Blofeld trilogy with the Craig films. Not quite the same admittedly, but the emotional content and intensity should be there.
#6
Posted 07 November 2006 - 05:39 PM
#7
Posted 07 November 2006 - 05:56 PM
And by the way, EON won the suit laid by McClory, so EON now has all the rights to Bond and Thunderball and Blofeld that McClory had. McClory lost all his rights to everything Bond-related.
#8
Posted 07 November 2006 - 06:06 PM
The Mourning After - Teaser A
http://img87.imagesh...ingafter6iy.jpg
Teaser A was inspired by one of the GoldenEye teaser posters.
The Mourning After - Teaser C
http://img254.images...rteaserc8ci.jpg
Teaser C was inspired by the Die Another Day Teaser B/Final US One Sheet.
#9
Posted 07 November 2006 - 06:41 PM
Unless they remake OHMSS (and if they were to do that, it could not come so close to CR b/c of the similar serious relationship with the girl, so it would not be Craig doing it), there is no way to do a sequel to OHMSS. All we can do is continue to point out that DAF failed on many levels, mostly this one. And that really doesn't make it better, either.
And by the way, EON won the suit laid by McClory, so EON now has all the rights to Bond and Thunderball and Blofeld that McClory had. McClory lost all his rights to everything Bond-related.
Very interested in your comment that EON now has the rights to SPECTRE and Blofeld. Can I ask how you know this? Do you have some kind of insider information about EON/McClory? I don`t ask this to be rude, simply just to know.
Can anyone else back up 00Twelve`s statement?
I would have thought, had EON had access to SPECTRE, they might have used it in CR, (or perhaps for Bond 22 and beyond) especially as they are using a similar type organisation in CR.
I`m sure everybody (and that includes general cinema going Bond fans as well) watching CR would instantly remember the SPECTRE name/organisation and having them in CR would have added to the nod the producers have done, which is return Bond back to its 60`s roots in this film.
Best
Andy
#10
Posted 07 November 2006 - 06:48 PM
#11
Posted 13 November 2006 - 04:39 PM
I know it's too late now, but there was so much to love about OHMSS, especially the cast (George included IMO). I really liked Draco, always wished he could have come back for another Bond movie, for me one of Bonds best alies, only rivaled by Ali Kerim Bey. I also thought that Bunt was a good character, not your typical henchwoman. Though I'm not sure what they would have done with her character had they made a proper sequel, the actress died the same year OHMSS was released.
Draco reappears in a Raymond Benson novel, though you not as you might expect. Bundt reappears in Fleming's YOLT as Blofeld's de facto wife, and does a great deal of hideous verbal cuddling with him.
#12
Posted 13 November 2006 - 04:56 PM
#13
Posted 13 November 2006 - 05:01 PM
However, I don't really long for it...we got what we got. OHMSS is fantstic and DAF is funny in small doses...I'll take a vengeance-style sequel in Bond 22 and be happy with it.
OH and BTW.....4 days! 4 days!! OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!
#14
Posted 13 November 2006 - 05:15 PM
However, like ComplimentsOfSharky said, he may end up doing one like this anyway, but it'd be that much more interesting if it took place just after the events of OHMSS.
#15
Posted 14 November 2006 - 12:53 AM
FYEO was the first time that OHMSS was really recognised, although Bond's wife was referred to in TSWLM too. However, the fact that Blofeld/The wheelchair villain had a neckbrace, suggests that it could follow directly from OHMSS.
I like to see it that way...
#16
Posted 23 November 2006 - 03:23 PM
#17
Posted 23 November 2006 - 05:35 PM
#18
Posted 23 November 2006 - 05:56 PM
#19
Posted 25 November 2006 - 03:16 PM
Detractors of Licence to Kill often ask whether Bond would really leave MI6 and set out on revenge over the mauling of his friend and the murder of his friend's wife.
But I think Bond's so angry because he's really getting revenge for Tracy. It's why the reference to his marriage is brought up early in the film. Della's death stirs up the anger he has over the death of his own wife.
If you were to ask Michael Wilson I reckon he'd admit that this aspect was on his mind when he wrote the script to Licence to Kill.
Cheers.
#20
Posted 25 November 2006 - 06:34 PM
#21
Posted 25 November 2006 - 08:37 PM
FYEO was the first time that OHMSS was really recognised, although Bond's wife was referred to in TSWLM too. However, the fact that Blofeld/The wheelchair villain had a neckbrace, suggests that it could follow directly from OHMSS.
I like to see it that way...
So do I, if I'm in a 'serious' Bond movie mood. I really think they made a right mess of Diamonds Are Forever and it is quite obvious that Connery could care less about what happened to Tracy in the previous film. In spite of that, I wonder if Lazenby had the acting chops to play a vengeful Bond. I'm going to imagine that he did, considering how well he played the dramatic scenes in OHMSS.
#22
Posted 30 November 2006 - 06:39 AM
#23
Posted 30 November 2006 - 08:52 PM
#24
Posted 01 December 2006 - 01:28 AM
Bond thinks he just killed Blofied, they guy who killed his wife, but you'd never know it from Connery's stolid expression. It was like Tracy never existed at all.
I'd agree regarding the rest of the film, but disagree about the precredits sequence. The precredits sequence shows a man who's predetermined to hunt down Blofeld to the ends of the Earth, and doesn't care who he smashes along the way. And the particularly sadistic way Bond dispatches of Blofeld--slamming him on the head with a lamp, tying him to the operating table and pushing it into boiling mud--coupled with Connery's vengeful satisfaction in saying "welcome to hell Blofeld" indicates that for Connery's Bond this is something personal. Connery does say the "welcome" line quietly, but with a great deal of satisfaction and relish, and anyway, Bond is hardly the emo type...
#25
Posted 11 December 2006 - 10:03 PM
#26
Posted 12 December 2006 - 04:43 AM
I assume Blofeld survived his smokestack drop and just finally got slayed when he had his head cut off.
#27
Posted 12 December 2006 - 05:27 AM
Anyway, I just realized one way that DAF, even the version that we ended up with, could have been a more worthy sequel to OHMSS. There was one way that the film could have ended up similarly to YOLT, the novel. What if Blofeld had simply been assuming the identity of Willard Whyte to live as a rich, secluded Vegas tycoon...and that was it?
Fleming wrote the last chapter of Blofeld's life to be Blofeld's disgusting "retirement," secluded in a castle in Japan, not trying once again to actively dominate the world (oh wait, that was never his objective...ever) or to hold the world ransom (That's what he was doing...). I would have enjoyed Diamonds Are Forever as a follow-up to OHMSS if Bond had been sent on this pipeline into a diamond smuggling ring, only to find that it led to a reclusive Vegas tycoon, then only to discover that the tycoon was...Ernst Stavro Blofeld! (And that is the big plot secret, the climax) Still would have been a very implausible film, but it would have been quite satisfying to see Bond seething with anger when he came out of that loo and saw Blofeld, wanting desperately to kill him, and after rescuing the real Whyte, made it his personal mission to get back inside that penthouse, just to kill Blofeld with his bare hands. No diamond satellite, no lame oil rig finale.
Sounds neat to me, at least!
#28
Posted 12 December 2006 - 05:59 AM
#29
Posted 12 December 2006 - 06:46 AM
I stated that I use the book by Fleming as a sequel to the movies to satisfy my need for a proper end to the Tracy arc.
Why? Why mix the films with the novels, they don't go together, nor should they. The cinematic Bond has nothing in common with the Bond of the novels, so it's an odd mix.
#30
Posted 12 December 2006 - 07:09 AM