Craig speaks to Parade on the newest Bond film
No Smoking For Daniel Craig In Casino Royale
#1
Posted 01 October 2006 - 05:37 AM
#2
Posted 01 October 2006 - 10:23 AM
#3
Posted 01 October 2006 - 10:35 AM
#4
Posted 01 October 2006 - 11:06 AM
Those bastards.
#5
Posted 01 October 2006 - 11:33 AM
On the contrary, smoking is bad for your health but killing people & having sex are not.I dont see why Bond shouldn't smoke, the producers say its a bad Example for Childen - yeah whatever, if they were that bothered about setting a good example Bond Wouldn't be Killing people and having Sex
#6
Posted 01 October 2006 - 11:58 AM
Shame really but maybe they'll complain about how Casino Royale encourages kids to purchase a Sony Blu-Ray VAIO AR laptop since Smoking is out of Casino Royale.
#7
Posted 01 October 2006 - 12:30 PM
#8
Posted 01 October 2006 - 02:02 PM
Idiots.
#9
Posted 01 October 2006 - 03:44 PM
The funny thing is, Pierce smoked in the last one so its not like they haven't had Bond smoking since the 70's or something....
#10
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:01 PM
#11
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:18 PM
#12
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:23 PM
There's just something about cigar smoking with isn't Bond, IMO.
#13
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:42 PM
#14
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:49 PM
He's under 6'. He's now blonde. He doesn't smoke. I mean, what's next?
Citical praise? Someone who can actually act? Someone who isn't over 50 and dying his hair?
#15
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:50 PM
Well killing people might not be bad for your own health, but it's certainly bad for someone elses.On the contrary, smoking is bad for your health but killing people & having sex are not.
I dont see why Bond shouldn't smoke, the producers say its a bad Example for Childen - yeah whatever, if they were that bothered about setting a good example Bond Wouldn't be Killing people and having Sex
#16
Posted 01 October 2006 - 04:53 PM
#17
Posted 01 October 2006 - 05:08 PM
They're going for realism here, so does it make much sense that a man who could die at any moment in the line of duty from a bomb or a gunshot, would really give a spit about the dangers of cigarette smoking, especially when the life expectancy of a 00 is rather short?
Yeah, one thing you notice about SAS, ardent skiers, scuba-divers and people chasing around free-running terrorists is how much they smoke.
#18
Posted 01 October 2006 - 05:23 PM
Simulated sex and/or playing dead (can be much the same thing) one can get for free.
As anyone who's ever been married can tell you.
One can't blow the budget on buying loads of packs of cigarettes for reshoots. Also, I suspect that they are a continuity nightmare.
Do people really go to James Bond films waiting for him to light up?
Yes, there may have been a notion that they return to the character what Fleming done writted, but one might as well complain about the absence of casual racism or having him whacked off his man-chebs on Benzedrine.
#19
Posted 01 October 2006 - 08:46 PM
Think about it. The man has no family. He has a relatively low-paying job that doesn't allow him a social life, and that requires him to kill people on a regular basis. Where else is he going to turn for solace? His housekeeper?
I think the movies have made a mistake in downplaying Bond's vices, because those vices tell more about his state of mind than any number of soul-bearing, peeling-back-the-layers soliloquies. They tell us that he's a man who's constantly being put into impossible moral and social situations, and who requires a little artificially-induced relief now and then.
So, as to this piece of news, expected though it was: boo.
#20
Posted 01 October 2006 - 08:49 PM
Smoking, sex, booze, Benzedrine: these are important parts of the Bond character, because they're the things he uses to bring pleasure into his otherwise painful life.
Think about it. The man has no family. He has a relatively low-paying job that doesn't allow him a social life, and that requires him to kill people on a regular basis. Where else is he going to turn for solace? His housekeeper?
I think the movies have made a mistake in downplaying Bond's vices, because those vices tell more about his state of mind than any number of soul-bearing, peeling-back-the-layers soliloquies. They tell us that he's a man who's constantly being put into impossible moral and social situations, and who requires a little artificially-induced relief now and then.
So, as to this piece of news, expected though it was: boo.
They took him into MI-6 despite heavy drinking, smoking and taking Benzedrine???
#21
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:18 PM
#22
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:26 PM
#23
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:29 PM
#24
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:42 PM
Oh yes let's make Bond grittier, edgier, more dangerous, lets have him kill people in nasty ways with real consequences, lets have a scene in which he gets his testicles beaten. But for God's Sake don't let anyone see him smoking. I mean, heavens to betsy, what will the children think???
They would probably think, "This is boring. When is this guy going to quit smoking and popping pills and start chasing bad guys again???"
#25
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:52 PM
#26
Posted 01 October 2006 - 09:59 PM
Let's just have him coke up or do crack!
I mean, in the 50-some years since Fleming wrote about it, they've learned things about Benzedrene -- and since 007 doesn't have narcolepsy, I think the MI-6 doctor would prescribe something else. (Although I doubt he'd go for the crack, either.)
In regard to smoking, it'd just be an affectation. I'd have trouble buying a guy chasing a Free Runner for an hour and a half while smoking three packs a day.
#27
Posted 01 October 2006 - 10:32 PM
People have said the same thing about including Moneypenny, Q, the gadgets, the locales, Bond's looks, his height, his hair color, etc....at what point do all these "little things" finally add up to the point where the character no longer resembles Bond, but instead some bastardization that no one really cares about?
So if you don't care, quit posting, then.
Personally I'm boycotting this film until Bond wears a blue polkadotted bow tie on a short sleeve dress shirt, can't catch his breath after 20 slow pushups, and calls minorites inferior. BRING BACK EVERYTHING OR NOTHING!!!
#28
Posted 02 October 2006 - 01:55 PM
And, personally, I deeply dislike the idea that Lazenby was the only real James Bond.
#29
Posted 02 October 2006 - 02:09 PM
#30
Posted 02 October 2006 - 04:16 PM
So. The cigarette in Casino Royale has been replaced by the leading actor having his gonads fiddled with. Hence, no phallic symbol for him, just a high pitched voice and a box of Kleenex.