| [center] Looking Back: Icebreaker [4]John Gardner
#2
|
Because I've been asked many times I should declare that I think the best of my Bonds is The Man from Barbarossa: it was also Glidrose's favourite, but when we handed it to the American publishers they screamed in agony - "This isn't the mixture as before," they shrieked. Which was exactly what I was aiming for. - Gardner's website |
#9
Posted 03 May 2005 - 05:12 PM
#10
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:17 PM
#11
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:47 PM
#12
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:54 PM
...or is she...?
A dire portent of things to come. "Neo Nazis, hotel rooms, inexplicable twists, madness" - a seven word review of the entire thirty-eight (or however many there were) Gardner books. If you want a model Gardner book, though, if you want instant Gardner experience - this is it.
#13
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:59 PM
#16
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:06 PM
I remember the double and triple crosses threw me when I first read Icebreaker in '83. Back then, a double cross seemed a cheap device in James Bond adventure (are you reading this, P&W). But after 13 more Gardner books in which double cross becomes the name of the game, I re-read Icebreaker and actually thought it worked best in this book.
Thats one thing that the Bond series could use less of. It's so cliche now for Bond. GoldenEye, The World Is Not Enough, Die Another Day, and inevitably Casino Royale.
#18
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:26 PM
do people know John Gardner personally?
Yes, they do.
Also, I don't think I'm really breaking some major news here by pointing out that Gardner himself reads and is on CBn.
You had me going for a minute there. Actually, no, you didn't.
I quite like parts of ICEBREAKER, but I hate that thing at the end where he thinks he's in Heaven. We'd never seen that one before, John! I also disliked the laziness of calling her Paula Vacker. That's not a Bond girl name, just trasnlating the word 'beautiful'! And by 1983, the neo-Nazi thing had been done in hundreds of thrillers - usually better than this. See THE QUILLER MEMORANDUM, for instance.
Bash over. Book coming.
#19
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:34 PM
Myself, I like Icebreaker. It's not the best by far as some others say, but it's definitely in his better half.
#20
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:40 PM
do people know John Gardner personally?
Yes, they do.
Also, I don't think I'm really breaking some major news here by pointing out that Gardner himself reads and is on CBn.
You had me going for a minute there. Actually, no, you didn't.![]()
Errr..I wasn't kidding. Gardner has been on CBn since at least the time that Zencat wrote that piece THE SILVER BEAST.
#21
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:52 PM
Bugger. I've offended someone again, haven't I? Sorry Darren/Sean/Ian.
#22
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:53 PM
#23
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:06 PM
The sad part was everything seemed so transparent and I could predict everything that happened before it happened. There was no mystery. The ice torture was original and different, though. But by the ending when I just knew what would happen it just seemed like the perfect lame ending to an underwhelming read.
#25
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:13 PM
I don't forget Charlie Higson says he reads the forums?
I had read that he was keeping up with the reaction to his book in the 007 fan community.
From an interview I saw on the BBC's Newsnight a while back, and something I read subsequently somewhere (in The Daily Telegraph, I think), it seems Higson is very scathing about the 007 fan community. He appears to think people posting on sites like this one are "scary fanatics" who've reacted too harshly to "SilverFin".
Given that Higson once went on Celebrity Mastermind with Bond as his specıalıst subject, he comes across a little like John Cork railing against the pasty-skinned and wifeless.
#26
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:17 PM
I don't forget Charlie Higson says he reads the forums?
I had read that he was keeping up with the reaction to his book in the 007 fan community.
From an interview I saw on the BBC's Newsnight a while back, and something I read subsequently somewhere (in The Daily Telegraph, I think), it seems Higson is very scathing about the 007 fan community. He appears to think people posting on sites like this one are "scary fanatics" who've reacted too harshly to "SilverFin".
I thought Higson was talking about the initial fan reaction to the idea of a Young Bond series, not reaction to SilverFin itself...which has been, overall, pretty positive (at least here on CBn).
#27
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:23 PM
I thought Higson was talking about the initial fan reaction to the idea of a Young Bond series, not reaction to SilverFin itself...which has been, overall, pretty positive (at least here on CBn).
Well, whatever. But you're probably right in bringing up the initial reaction to the idea of Young Bond - the impression I got was that Higson thinks the "scary fanatics" are ultrahardcore Fleming purists who loathe the notion of anything new. He certainly came across as very anti the Bond fansites (yeah, I know he gave you an interview for CBn).
#29
Posted 03 May 2005 - 10:00 PM
the impression I got was that Higson thinks the "scary fanatics" are ultrahardcore Fleming purists who loathe the notion of anything new.
Is he wrong?
Well, he's wrong if he thinks anyone on a fansite expressing reservations about the idea of Young Bond must be a frothing-at-the-mouth, Fleming-thumping old stick-in-the-mud. I don't deny that such people exist (and good luck to them, surely - after all, we all have our own likes and dislikes when it comes to Bond; I'm sure Higson does, too), but it would be wrong to tar all fansite members (or even all members of the anti-Young Bond brigade, or all people who dislike "SilverFin") with the same brush.
#30
Posted 03 May 2005 - 10:20 PM


