sthgilyadgnivileht, on 08 February 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:
Things like this don't worry me. Anyone recounting their life in their eighties is going to have a slight distortion of events, and moreover may prefer to look back on their life with rose tinted spectacles as well, which is their prerogative. Chitty Chitty Bang Bang can be called a decent success, depending on how you look at it. It may have lost money on release, but it has endured in popularity since.
This autobiography is great perspective on Broccoli's thoughts and attitude as a very talented film producer. For this it is well worth a read, even if the odd fact is off.
Didn't Michael Caine say if you want to write a truthful Biography these days you have to call it a novel.
So you are basically saying its ok to be inaccurate?
Listen, I understand Broccoli's memories weren't going to be 100% accurate. Human memory is faulty. I have trouble remembering things from 3 years ago - I can't imagine what it would be like trying to recall events that 30 years+ old.
But conceivably, that is why you hire Donald Zec, an entertainment journalist from the Daily Mail. To investigate, to verfiy, etc.
BTW, my critcism of Chitty being called a success was directed at Junkanoo, who called it that, not Broccoli.
Anyway, my problem with the book doesn't lie with Broccoli, I am sure he was telling things as he remembered them. My fault is with Zec who just assumed everything Broccoli said was accurate and didn't bother to fact check.