Rant about The World Is Not Enough,
#1
Posted 31 July 2003 - 08:15 PM
(Dons Rant Cloak and staff)
I just watched The World Is Not Enought again for the millionth time...I like the movie some one, but it has to be my least favrite bond film of the series even though i love them all i consider them my children sickly so but what is it about the movie that appeals to people sure the Q boat was a cool piece of the movie but the rest to me was like bond in a daytime tv like Soaps...It just was bore scene to scene never doing any thing intresting until the SIlo shot out and then bore until madians tower...
It just didn't set well with me, i remember seeing it in the theater and being so excited and i saw it and thought...WHats happened here?
#2
Posted 31 July 2003 - 08:41 PM
But shouldn't this be in the Brosnan forum?
#3
Posted 31 July 2003 - 09:09 PM
At the cinema I was the most excited I've ever been, it was just superb, as a 15 year old.
However, the one major thing I have against the movie, and I thought I was mad for ages until I read the Bond Files by Andy Lane and Paul Simpson, is the action scene on the mountain with the parahawks. I thought it was a great action sequence but a bit pointless in the movie.
#4
Posted 31 July 2003 - 11:15 PM
You hit the nail on the head: TWINE is boring. It's like a James Bond soap opera where everyone is overacting and overemoting. My least favorite Bond film - it will never be purchased on DVD...
#5
Posted 31 July 2003 - 11:27 PM
#6
Posted 01 August 2003 - 12:05 AM
#7
Posted 01 August 2003 - 05:03 AM
#8
Posted 01 August 2003 - 11:07 PM
#9
Posted 02 August 2003 - 12:22 AM
#10
Posted 02 August 2003 - 12:29 AM
#11
Posted 02 August 2003 - 12:42 AM
DAD almost killed the whole series.Originally posted by MrDraco
Die Another Day killed it
#12
Posted 02 August 2003 - 01:36 AM
#13
Posted 02 August 2003 - 01:49 PM
#14
Posted 02 August 2003 - 03:24 PM
#15
Posted 02 August 2003 - 04:31 PM
#16
Posted 02 August 2003 - 05:13 PM
Originally posted by Ed King:
A plot that was ripped from DAF.
Hardy a defense against the film, but TWINE doesn't have much in the way of originality either. It's just an reinterpretation of the villians' plots in Goldfinger and A View to a Kill: destroy the industry competition so only the villian's product is available for only him to profit from. If you look at the recent films, you'll hardly find any original plots - and once you hit the 17th Bond, you'll have trouble trying to think of them. GoldenEye was also a very "Diamonds"-esque plot with the satellite and all, with Xenia Onnatop a 90s reincarnation of Fiona Volpe and Fatima Blush. Tomorrow Never Dies is a 90s reinterpretation of the World War III plots used in You Only Live Twice, The Spy Who Loved Me, and Octopussy. Whichever Brosnan film you like the most, I don't think you'll find the most original plot. I love every Brosnan film for its strengths, and most of them have great stories and modern spins of the old stories, but let's face it: James Bond isn't the most original guy anymore. Everything has been done at least once.
#17
Posted 02 August 2003 - 05:58 PM
#18
Posted 02 August 2003 - 08:57 PM
I never said TWINE is an original movie. No Bond movie has been original since... I don't know, FRWL? However, being not totally original and being a complete ripoff are very different things.Originally posted by Doubleshot
Hardy a defense against the film, but TWINE doesn't have much in the way of originality either. It's just an reinterpretation of the villians' plots in Goldfinger and A View to a Kill: destroy the industry competition so only the villian's product is available for only him to profit from.
#19
Posted 02 August 2003 - 09:23 PM
#20
Posted 03 August 2003 - 01:25 AM
Originally posted by Ed King
I never said TWINE is an original movie. No Bond movie has been original since... I don't know, FRWL? However, being not totally original and being a complete ripoff are very different things.
In my mind, Die Another Day's no more a ripoff than TWINE is. Same plots, just a few changes. Take out Goldfinger, Pussy Galore, and Odd Job, throw in the Elektra King character and Renard's sympathetic villian and you have changed Goldfinger into TWINE. Take out Blofeld, Vegas and the diamond smuggling chain and throw in Miranda Frost and the torture scenes and you've successfully changed Diamonds are Forever into Die Another Day.
#21
Posted 03 August 2003 - 03:20 AM
But the point about GE having the satellite thing is something I've thought before also and wonder why nobody brings this up but automatically brands DAD as a DAF remake because of its deadly satellite. GE just seems to get held to a higher standard by a lot of people it seems.
#22
Posted 03 August 2003 - 04:45 AM
#23
Posted 04 August 2003 - 12:01 AM
Originally posted by Turn
But the point about GE having the satellite thing is something I've thought before also and wonder why nobody brings this up but automatically brands DAD as a DAF remake because of its deadly satellite. GE just seems to get held to a higher standard by a lot of people it seems.
I agree completely. GoldenEye doesn't take its story from merely one Bond film as the others do, we get a series of past Bond sequences and plots. SPECTRE's plot to steal the nuclear warheads in Thunderball by using a pawn identical to a high ranking military officer becomes Janus' plot to steal the Tiger helicopter. Quite a few things - the location of Monte Carlo and the obvious similiarities between Xenia Onnatop and Fatima Blush for example - are derived from Never Say Never Again. GoldenEye has become for the 90s Bond fans what Goldfinger became for the 60s Bond fans, The Spy Who Loved Me became for the 70s, and For Your Eyes Only became for the 80s - an undebateable classic. Period. You're not allowed to find the flaws in it. Some fans feel like they have to fit into the mold that Sean Connery is the best - the only - James Bond and Goldfinger is the best Bond film ever made and GoldenEye is the rebirth. Sorry, GoldenEye is a great film - but it's not that great in my mind.
#24
Posted 04 August 2003 - 04:48 PM
And when he was electrecuting Bond I couldn't help but think of the emperor torturing Luke in Return of the Jedi. What were they thinking?
TWINE did one thing very well and that was send off Desmond and introduce the perfect replacement, John Cleese. Pretitle in Spain was awesome too but the movie went down hill after that.
#25
Posted 04 August 2003 - 04:54 PM
#26
Posted 04 August 2003 - 06:10 PM
Originally posted by Dr.Carl Mortner
Heh-heh; I can't WAIT until DLibrasnow sees this post;P.
You hit the nail on the head: TWINE is boring. It's like a James Bond soap opera where everyone is overacting and overemoting. My least favorite Bond film - it will never be purchased on DVD...
Dr. Mortner, my thoughts on this abomination of a movie are well known, but they were recently reinforced -
I saw the terrible "Casino Royale" (1967) on Turner Classic Movies this past weekend....You know, I managed to sit through it, which is something that I cannot manage to do with TWINE....That tells me that IMO "The World is Not Enough" is worse than the unfunny spoof "Casino Royale"....It is not only the worst Bond movie ever but it probably ranks as one of the worst "action" (I use the term loosely because there's hardly any of it in this travesty) movies of the last 30 years.
I haven't been able to sit through TWINE since I saw it the first night it was out in the movie theater. I almost walked out in disgust then too...I promised a CBNer (who will remain nameless) that I would try and sit through it a couple of months back but I failed...I simply don't like it. Really, after the boat chase it slips into melodrama and never recovers. It is the most boring non-fun movie of the franchise.
- It was boring and they turned James Bond into a Nancy-boy.
- The action setpieces seemed artificial and forced
#27
Posted 04 August 2003 - 06:58 PM
#28
Posted 04 August 2003 - 07:18 PM
Christmas Jones is a idiotic fool who just rants on about scientific info that no one really seems to care about.
Renard is a WEAK villain. Some people say that the key to a great Bond film is how the villains are portrayed, lucky that Elektra King saves TWINE from the dumps.
Of what little action scenes there are, they are just overkill. Take the parahawks scene for instance, a lot of useless shooting for no real reason to the plot. Michael Apted must have just thrown in these action scenes just to make it a Bond movie.
YES, a TV soap opera does describe this film. It is an overplayed drama that just doesn't flow.
Now, I do like the film, but it will never get to my top 5, but it also won't sink into my bottom 5. The World Is Not Enough is just average.
#29
Posted 04 August 2003 - 07:40 PM
#30
Posted 09 August 2003 - 06:40 AM

